View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: Rolleiflex 2.8E2, Rokkor 1.2, Nikkor 1.2, Flek', Monoball... |
|
|
bawang wrote:
I am selling some items to finance purchase and slimming down on gear. Please contact if you are interested, and we can work something out. I have bought/traded/sell here before. I have 100% +ve _bay feedbacks under 3tu3ni. Prices are gestimate based on x% discount of some ebay recent prices, so if they are legitimately unreasonable, please contact. We can work something out. Shipping and Paypal extra.
Minolta MC Rokkor PG 58mm f1.2 …………..$450
Jim Buchanans Rokkor/Canon Adapter (non-destructive) (at cost) …………..$75
Leica Summicron Collapsible 5cm LTM …………..$250
Nikkor-S. 55mm F1.2……. $220
Nikkor-H 85mm f1.8 ….. $150
Nikkor U.D. 20mm f3.5 …..$175
Arca Swiss Monoball …… $250
RSS Universal Quick Release Plate for Arca Swiss …. $35
Rolleiflex 2.8E2 s/n 23564xx Schneider Kreuznach Xenotar …… $700
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon Zebra f4 20mm …… $300
(Carl Zeiss) aus Jena Flektogon Zebra f2.8 35mm ……..$150
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon MC f2.4 35mm …..$225
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar f3.5 50mm ……… $75 (light haze seen with intense light))
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar f2.8 50mm ……..$ 40
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar f3.5 135mm ……..$175
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar Zebra f3.5 135mm ……..$150
Asahi Super Multi Coated Takumar f3.5 28mm ……… $65
Square Hood for Asahi Super Multi Coated Takumar f3.5 28mm ….. $25
Yashica Auto Yashinon DX f2.8 35mm ………$100
(Tomioka) Yashica Auto Yashinon DX f.14 50mm …..$75
*Edited: Corrected the Nikkor-S which initially wrongly stated as Nikkor SC.
Last edited by bawang on Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I want to endorse Khidhir as a great and very trustworthy guy.
I'm shocked to see your Rokkor and Nikkor 1.2's both going. I suppose I understand why though.
Any interest in a trade for the 2.8 Flex? I have some nice M glass that you might be interested in _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Man-o-man, I want that Nikkor-UD 20mm. What kind of shape is it in? I already have the hood to fit it.
Now, let me see what I can sell to finance the purchase . . . _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
I want to endorse Khidhir as a great and very trustworthy guy.
I'm shocked to see your Rokkor and Nikkor 1.2's both going. I suppose I understand why though.
Any interest in a trade for the 2.8 Flex? I have some nice M glass that you might be interested in |
Thanks for the endorsement Andy.
I am letting go the other Rokkor 1.2, not the one my daughter and I worked on during the conversion process I told you. That's too precious despite the scratched back elements Zeiss Lens Cloth did to it. The one I am selling is very nice and and I would say, KEH's EX rating. The Nikkor was not used that much since Rokkor. I still have another Nikkor 55/1.2 on loan to a friend back home. So these are technically duplicates.
Which M glass are you talking about? I need the $$$ more than glass now, but what the heck, I will need them eventually, right. Might as well be now than later
@cooltouch. the Nikkor UD 20 has clean/clear glass and dry blades. The body does have some paint rub from use. It's pre-Ai. Are you a Nikon body user or something else? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
bawang wrote: |
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
I want to endorse Khidhir as a great and very trustworthy guy.
I'm shocked to see your Rokkor and Nikkor 1.2's both going. I suppose I understand why though.
Any interest in a trade for the 2.8 Flex? I have some nice M glass that you might be interested in |
Thanks for the endorsement Andy.
I am letting go the other Rokkor 1.2, not the one my daughter and I worked on during the conversion process I told you. That's too precious despite the scratched back elements Zeiss Lens Cloth did to it. The one I am selling is very nice and and I would say, KEH's EX rating. The Nikkor was not used that much since Rokkor. I still have another Nikkor 55/1.2 on loan to a friend back home. So these are technically duplicates.
Which M glass are you talking about? I need the $$$ more than glass now, but what the heck, I will need them eventually, right. Might as well be now than later
|
Tell me what you need. Wide, Portrait, Fast, Classic Leitz/Nikkor/Zeiss??
I have a few that could match value. Of course I leave in two days so we will have to be quick to decide anyway.
Send me PM or email _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
bawang wrote: |
@cooltouch. the Nikkor UD 20 has clean/clear glass and dry blades. The body does have some paint rub from use. It's pre-Ai. Are you a Nikon body user or something else? |
Nope, my Nikon is an old F2 with meterless DE-1 prism finder. So it doesn't matter what the meter coupling is. I'll use it also on my Canon FD or EOS with adapters, but pre-AI or whatever doesn't matter with those systems. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrQQ
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrQQ wrote:
sorry for probably stupid question, but what does H, S.C. mean in Nikkor? which mount are they? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
S.C. = super coating
H indicates the number of elements (here 6): http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/index.htm
Some great prices there! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
S.C. = super coating
|
Well, not actually. S.C. means (Septa, meaning 7 elements) with Coating.
Am I right, that the Nikkor is not AI-converted? _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrQQ
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrQQ wrote:
I wonder if they'd work with Nikon DSLRs.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
The Nikkors are pre-ai. They will work without modification only on D40. The newer Nikon D-SLR requires that they are converted first to Ai. This can be done professionaly or DIY. An easy task if you are handy with a file.
John from http://www.aiconversions.com can do it for a fee. And there are many other outfits that will do it. If I am a Nikon shooter, I would do it myself. It an easy job.
Last edited by bawang on Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
I have quickly taken and uploaded the pictures of items for sale. It's overcast outdoor for me to take the lens out to take pictures from it or of it. Lighting as very bad in the house and I had to use flash which reflected the flash and exaggerated any dust on the lens. These are all handheld at iso400 on Canon 20D using Zuiko 2/28.
Correction : The Nikkor 1.2/55 is actually Nikkor-S 1.2/55. It's is not Nikkor-SC as previously advertised. Does that mean it is single coated?
http://mypage.iu.edu/~kzakaria/for_sale/
Please look at the pictures and email me if you have anymore questions or would request for more pictures. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|