| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Riccardox
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 40
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:20 am Post subject: Gondole... Fuji Neopan 1600... |
 |
|
Riccardox wrote:
Super Angulon R 1:4/21
Any comments are welcome...
By riccardox at 2009-11-26
By riccardox at 2009-11-26
_________________
R6 - R4s - LeicaflexSL2 ... Super Angulon21, 35 Summicron, 50 Summicron, 90 Summicron, 135 Elmarit, 250 Telyt, Extender2X...
M6 - M5 ... Summicron50 Summicron90 TS Summaron35 3.5 Ektor135 Elmar90 "Fat"
Sorry for my bad English... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The points of view are nice, especially the first one... unfortunately in Venice it's not easy to separate the main subject from the background because the "calle" are so narrow.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 5883
Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I like #1 with the prow nicely separated against water.
Neopan 1600  I suppose I'm still in half-frame 70's when it comes to high speed film... the grain and tone are excellent
_________________
-Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 1631
Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
The first one is very intersting, good composition. I don't know if its due to the 1600 iso , but the water looks a bit muddy. I have made the infamous experience of similar iso in day light conditons .... meh.
_________________
Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6943
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
#1 is the better composition for me.
That's pretty impressive grain for 1600iso.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
#1 is the better composition for me.
That's pretty impressive grain for 1600iso. |
+1
impressive grain |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Riccardox
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Riccardox wrote:
Thanks all of you for comments... the Neopan 1600 is wonderfull if is developed in Ilfotec DD-X... the water of Venice is not like Maldive's island 
_________________
R6 - R4s - LeicaflexSL2 ... Super Angulon21, 35 Summicron, 50 Summicron, 90 Summicron, 135 Elmarit, 250 Telyt, Extender2X...
M6 - M5 ... Summicron50 Summicron90 TS Summaron35 3.5 Ektor135 Elmar90 "Fat"
Sorry for my bad English... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 767
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Nice perspectives. Grain size looks indeed small for an high ISO film. I'd have expected more. DD-X / Neopan 1600 looks like a good combo.
Cheers. Marty.
_________________
Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
