some photos from the farm yard with film expired 1986

[riba]

When I took the camera from father, then he gave me 2 rols of the film which limit the use of long over.
Here is first film



Rollei 2.8F, film Efke R17, developer Efke FR-16, negativ scaned with Canoscan 8800F

[poilu]

wow! great, like new after so many years

[Orio]

#2 has something tragical and comical at the same time
I like it

[shauttra]

Exellent results for old film!!
Did you use owerexposure for film?

[riba]

Thanks you all.
I set time for Exposure and develop on 50 asa.
On the negative is visible damage and I think that because of age.

[hexi]

This is very good, i don't know if its due to age or its the film actual rendition , but the lith touch is great. I like them all, very detailed

[Riccardox]

Well done... also good photos...

[martinsmith99]

#2 is a classic. I agree with Orio's comments.

Caption anyone?

[StanW]

Great pictures, and the ideal place for photography.

[mo]

here goes
"Is that my butt I see before me?"

[riba]

Thank you all.

[marty]

Very careful compositions. Perfect choice for DOF. And yes, BW film is lasting that long unless you keep it for years in the glove compartment of your car or in a humid basement or under the beams in the attic. I once exposed & developed a thirty years old roll of FP4 ( yes regular FP4 and not FP4+) and it worked happily, maybe worthless pics but they come out...

Cheers, Marty.

[StanW]

Hi, Marty,
I've just come by some ancient FP4 and HP4 220 which I'll be using over the next few weeks.
My fingers are crossed.

[Seele]

Slow films inherently keep better; if a roll of Royal or Recording of this age survived, I do not think it would give satisfactory results like these.