Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Using CZJ 135/3.5 for macro - next steps?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:59 am    Post subject: Using CZJ 135/3.5 for macro - next steps? Reply with quote

Winter in Prague means a lot of cloudy skies, so I've decided to try some new stuff in terms of photos, specifically macro.

Right now, I have a set of M42 extension tubes (these: http://camera-shop.co.nz/images/m42-tubes.jpg) which I am using with my CZJ 135/3.5, my shortest M42 lens. While it's cumbersome to set up and focus, I'm pretty pleased with the image quality so far, this is probably my best result so far:



I'm happy with the quality, but I'd like to get even closer. This was using all 3 extension tubes. I'm wondering what the best way to get closer would be, more extension tubes, reverse ring? Any other options?

Thanks for the help...


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can mount a lens reversed on the camera body or connect two lenses together as described here http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=168 which can give enormous magnifications.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another little advice I can give, when using extension tubes, or bellows, to use a normal focusing lens for macro, it's best to avoid the tele lenses. This because, unless they are "apo" lenses, they all will show an amount of chromatic aberrations, that are possible to see, for instance, also in this image you have posted. Use a normal lens instead, a 50mm, and do not use a very fast one, because it also is likely to have chromatic aberrations. A slower lens, like a f/2 or f/2.8 50mm, are your best bet. For instance, a very cheap Tessar 2.8/50 is a great candidate for macro use with tubes.

-


Last edited by Orio on Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:54 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shorter focal length lens, more tubes/bellows will get more magnification.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, so I should look into a 50mm, slower lens and maybe get another set of tubes? Since I won't be doing insects (at least not planning to at the moment) moving up really close isn't a huge issue, so I guess that 50mm will be a decent range to work with. Any specific lens recommendations?

Sorry, I just noticed the Tessar 50/2.8 recommendation, any others by chance?

Thanks again!


Last edited by dave_t on Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:12 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dave_t wrote:
Ok, so I should look into a 50mm, slower lens and maybe get another set of tubes? Since I won't be doing insects (at least not planning to at the moment) moving up really close isn't a huge issue, so I guess that 50mm will be a decent range to work with. Any specific lens recommendations?

Thanks again!


50mm lenses normally focus around 50 cm.
So if you add a tube, they will become macro for insects already.
I don't understand what you are after. Perhaps you should explain better.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
dave_t wrote:
Ok, so I should look into a 50mm, slower lens and maybe get another set of tubes? Since I won't be doing insects (at least not planning to at the moment) moving up really close isn't a huge issue, so I guess that 50mm will be a decent range to work with. Any specific lens recommendations?

Thanks again!


50mm lenses normally focus around 50 cm.
So if you add a tube, they will become macro for insects already.
I don't understand what you are after. Perhaps you should explain better.


Sorry. When researching macro I noticed that a lot of people were discussing insects, and therefore wanted 100mm+ macro lenses so they wouldn't have to get too close and frighten the bugs away. Since I'm not interested in insects, it looks like 50mm might be the way to go, rather than trying to force my 135mm to get up close?


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like I'm in luck, found a INDUSTAR 61L/Z for sale for about EUR37. Not a 'steal' of a price, but looks like the lens is just what I'm looking for and has been very well received.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a great lens. I'm not sure how big you want to magnify but that combined with your tubes should be plenty. I've a couple of sets of M42 tubes as they're so cheap.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I was quite lucky that it showed up the day that I was looking for a 50mm. Smile I only have 1 set of M42 tubes right now, but they are dirt cheap everywhere so if I don't get what I'm looking for, I can pick up some more. Unfortunately the more I look into macro photography, the more I find things that would make my life easier, like a focusing rail for instance...


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Focusing rail is by far the best system in my opinion.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:41 pm    Post subject: macro adaptors and macro TC's Reply with quote

There are two options I use with my 135's.

One is the Raynox clip on macro adaptors. They work well with 135mm length. You are limited to approx 6" of focal length but the results are good.

Vivitar 135 2.8 with Raynox 250 (the 150 would have a little less magnification but more DOF and working distance)






The other option I use is the Macro TC. I have a Vivitar 2x macro TC. Here is a shot with the Tair 11a 135mm and the vivi TC.
this is a tiny bug on a flower



PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I picked up the industar yesterday and went out immediately this morning to try it out. The image quality is outstanding, but to say that focusing without a focusing rail is 'a pain in the a**' is an absolute understatement. So ... I went and got a focusing rail. I hate being the type of person that thinks I can't do 'x' without 'y', but I spent more time micro-adjusting the legs on my tripod than I did getting shots, most of the time losing what I was going for. I'll be out again tomorrow morning, hopefully with a clear conscience. I'll have to quit smoking to keep up with this purchasing habit!


PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the one that I like the most so far from the Industar. Shot at about f/8 and 30mm (... i think) of extension tubes. I'm still learning how to manoevre in such close quarters.