Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Contax RX
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:09 pm    Post subject: Contax RX Reply with quote

Today I got a big package full with films and I found a Contax RX inside too. Many thanks Andy for your help to relay these items to me. Unfortunately camera is not mine I have to ship out on Monday to new owner I make a relay help too. Camera is a man camera truly, not small toy like many others , beautiful one.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, I think you are talking about me Very Happy
One more time, thanks for all.
Regards


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vagsousa wrote:
Hey, I think you are talking about me Very Happy
One more time, thanks for all.
Regards


Yes yours ! Lucky man! Laughing Laughing


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Carl Zeiss T * are waiting for this body, they like the EOS 30D, but were made for the Contax Razz


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vagsousa wrote:
My Carl Zeiss T * are waiting for this body, they like the EOS 30D, but were made for the Contax Razz


You have nice Contax lens set already so they need a king , not an Eos .. right.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I concur : this a a great camera ! handling is incredible and its not heavy, its well built Cool


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hexi wrote:
I concur : this a a great camera ! handling is incredible and its not heavy, its well built Cool


.........and heavy Laughing
I strapped two around for a couple years Wink


PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

F16SUNSHINE wrote:
hexi wrote:
I concur : this a a great camera ! handling is incredible and its not heavy, its well built Cool


.........and heavy Laughing
I strapped two around for a couple years Wink


Contax RX+Planar 85mm=1.41Kg
Canon 30D+Planar 85mm=1.38Kg

I can't see any difference Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a 50mm so i can't compare Wink

but my camera is hidden in the bag, and taken on the shoulder just to take pictures. it might be eye catching, despite the digital era, so no risks taken.

by the way is the handling wit ha 135mm good ? cause my worst enemy is hand held heavy lenses , i thin that a hea.... better built body may improve handling. thanx for any infos


PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have five Contaxes (spot a pattern?), but the RX is my favourite by a long way. It is solid without being over-weighty, it sits beautifully in the hands, and it has capabilities I haven't even used yet. I like it best with my 50/1.4 Planar mounted (it's a preference thing, it's equally at home with the 85 or 100 or 135 Sonnars) and few, very few, are in the same league.


PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RX is a great camera, I love mine.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congratulations Vagsousa!
I can not decide between RX, AX and RTS III and because of this, the Contax III is my only Contax Camera. Wink

Orio, don't you have both cameras, the AX and the RX? What is your opinion?
Now with the unexpected apperance of my darkroom equipment, I need to make a decision. Wink


PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carlsson wrote:
Congratulations Vagsousa!
I can not decide between RX, AX and RTS III and because of this, the Contax III is my only Contax Camera. Wink

Orio, don't you have both cameras, the AX and the RX? What is your opinion?
Now with the unexpected apperance of my darkroom equipment, I need to make a decision. Wink


Both are excellent
RX is less bulky
AX has the possibility of autofocus for those who may need it
I love both, if I had to choose one I would keep the AX, but I have large hands Smile


PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Orio!
AX for large hands, roger that! Wink


PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought none of Contaxes had autofocus Confused even the AX. Damn !
anyway i don't care i have an RX ^.^


PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hexi wrote:
I thought none of Contaxes had autofocus Confused even the AX.

Autofocus on the AX is ingenious ; it does it, not by moving the lens, but by moving the film plane. So any manual CY bayonet lens can be mounted yet be focussed automatically.


PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have RTS III and i can recomendit it, best mf camera. RTS III employs Real Time Vacuum system.
But RX and ST are all good cameras


PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AX is like having 10 mm extension tube inside, one click of the switch
you get close focus ability without using AF. This is very convenient too,
for certain lenses whose MFD is not too short for your liking.

OT: The designer of this ingenious AF made AF SLR at Yashica era, but
he or his company could not obtain the patent due to 6 months late
against Minolta alpha 7000 (world first AF SLR). Anyway later year,
just before his retirement from Kyocera (changed from Yashica at that
time), Kyocera CEO (Mr. Morita) said to him to go ahead for the designer's
pet project of this AF system. So he succeeded to complete Contax AF.
He was retired happily at least he made a world first kind of AF system.

I like my AX, and do not mind to get another one for a backup. (At KEH
there is one for a sale with price of ~US$500.)


PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Upping this one.

I'd like to know if the MM programs are kinda interesting ? I use The RX in av mode and i'm happy so far. Besides MM lenses are rare. thanx for the infos.


PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not Really. MM stands for "multi mode" in Contax's term, which means
the lens with MM can be used, Av, Tv, M, and most importantly Program
mode.

The most of us who come to this MFlenses may not use Tv and P mode,
or at least use only occasionally. This is my uncorrected prejudice. Very Happy

HOWEVER, MM lenses mostly made in japan have some improvements
such as less internal light reflection, better shape of iris and more consistent
quality. (It does not mean always better than AE lenses, some of AEs are
really superb.)


PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the AE 1.7/50 Planar, and the MM 1.7/50 Planar. Optically, I can't tell the difference between them. The only way I can tell for sure is to look up my photo notebook.

Like most people, my auto usage mode is almost invariably Av, so I wouldn't hesitate to choose an AE lens if it had a price advantage.


PostPosted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok thanx for the infos. Its what i though , cos as i said "av" mode is already comfy for me Wink