Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Backfocus with split-screen
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:46 pm    Post subject: Backfocus with split-screen Reply with quote

Looks like my recently-installed split-prism focusing screen needs adjustment. Intended focus was half-way along the stems of the letter"m" in Extreme, in line with the bottom of the bar of the letter "e". Actual sharpest focus is midway between "lock" and "SanDisk"

This is the full photo, which shows you nothing at this size::


(100% crop here, to save folks who don't like high resolution images)

Nikon D90, Cosina Voigtländer SL APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 Close Focus plus 49-52mm kood step-up ring plus Nikon 4T close-up lens @ ISO 500, 1/200s f/8

Any suggestions? Thicker/thinner shims (there where two shims when I took out the original screen, which I put back). There are also supposed to be cams somewhere under the mirror which can be adjusted with an allen key. Or maybe just taking it out and putting it back in again?


Last edited by ChrisLilley on Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:35 pm; edited 3 times in total


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the same problem. And I am having a very hard time finding the metal shims.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw Canon has many different shims for finders of EOS camera,
but forgot their model names. Can you ask Canon for shims directory?


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

koji wrote:
I saw Canon has many different shims for finders of EOS camera,
but forgot their model names. Can you ask Canon for shims directory?


I'm not sure to understand, Koji. Shims directory on Canon web site?


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Canon supplies over two dozen shims for each EOS camera, each has 0.01
mm difference. Customer centre mush have those shims. I do not think
they put them on their catalogue (they wont admit camera's true precision
particularly for finders Very Happy ).

But you can ask customer support centre for shims, thou you may have to
bring your own camera to fix font/rear focus problem.

When I cleaned my 5D finder, I found one shim used inside between penta-
prism and finder frame, finder screen is sitting on this frame with spring loaded
another metal frame to hold the screen.

----

When I bought a BrightScreen, My 5D became back-focus. So I complained it,
then sent me a metal shim used for their screen. BUT 5D became front-focus. Crying or Very sad
So I sanded this shim to just focus correctly, but their screen was not my taste.
This shim is installed body's finder frame and screen. (I still have this screen!)

Basically (simple conceptual diagram)

.......Penta-prism........
........Canon shim....... This is the shim I am talking about, Canon has many kinds!!!!
........metal frame......
........(shim)................................ extra I installed (it is not there when you buy a camera)
........finder screen...................... ^^^^ When I installed a BrightScreen
........metal frame to hold finder....
....... mirror box.........
..........mirror.............
..........bottom............

Now I use Ee-S screen only, but I attached Nikon DK-17M magnifier to 5D finder eyepiece.


Last edited by koji on Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:44 pm; edited 4 times in total


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the out of focus is not so big, about 2mm
maybe you will mess everything by trying to shim
just focus on the nose to get the eyes in focus


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poilu wrote:
the out of focus is not so big, about 2mm
maybe you will mess everything by trying to shim
just focus on the nose to get the eyes in focus


Thanks, but the 'just live with it' answer is not really what I was looking for. Here the focus error is about twice as much as the actual depth of field. That's not a workable solution.

If I wanted to shoot blind and hope, I would use film.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had this same problem, although much bigger, with my K20D and KatzEye. After sending the cam to Pentax (stilll under warranty) for adjustment, and getting it back without anything being done on it (grrrr Twisted Evil ), and lightly scratching my $160 replacement screen during the multiple sessions of taking it out and putting it back in, I broke down and sent the whole thing to KatzEye to get them professionally calibrate the MF and install the screen.


Needless to say, my K20D + KatzEye is now BANG on with the MF.


I don't know about Nikon, but with Pentax, I was told I should order the entire range of shims (very cheap) from Pentax service, if I wanted to do the adjustment on my own.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
koji wrote:
I saw Canon has many different shims for finders of EOS camera,
but forgot their model names. Can you ask Canon for shims directory?


I'm not sure to understand, Koji. Shims directory on Canon web site?


Shims...they are also called washers

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/704641.html


PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I put two small stripes of tape at the edges of my screen. That has worked fine.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello. I've just bought a split screen to my D80, and I have a 6mm backfocus. Should I install new shim under the new screen, or remove one? (There are two metal shims under the new screen, originally).

Luispictor: Did you use casette tape strip? If I have to install more, how much thickness dou you think?


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just ordered one of the Chinese screens yesterday although I have a replacement screen to a N90s that I'm about to cut down. The Chinese screen is a split microprism & the N90s screen is an "E" type Matt Fresnel/grid screen...I'll be using them on a Nikon D70s which I'm told has a stock brass shim. The camera however also has a set screw to adjust the focus (using an Allen wrench). From what I've read, the Chinese screen may need focus adjustments, but the Nikon screen I'm going to cut down should not...At least I hope so. I don't want to have to be adjusting the focus screw everytime I decide to swap out screens...


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having shot some test charts today, the AF (well, the green dot - I only have one AF lens and its a slow one) is fairly close, maybe a bit front focused, but its hard to tell because there is a range of focus where the dot is lit. So, lets say its ok.

The MF appears to be severely off, significant back focus.

To check I just did the same test with my D40 (which also has a split-prism screen); both the green dot and focusing by eye/prisms give similar results, with no significant back/front focus. In other words I can trust what my eyes tell me, to give a correct result.

My D40 had no shims under the the stock screen. My D90 had two different shims. I'm wondering about putting in the new screen with just one shim and seeing if that makes it better or worse. Or fiddling with the adjustment cams.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChrisLilley wrote:
Having shot some test charts today, the AF (well, the green dot - I only have one AF lens and its a slow one) is fairly close, maybe a bit front focused, but its hard to tell because there is a range of focus where the dot is lit. So, lets say its ok.

The MF appears to be severely off, significant back focus.

To check I just did the same test with my D40 (which also has a split-prism screen); both the green dot and focusing by eye/prisms give similar results, with no significant back/front focus. In other words I can trust what my eyes tell me, to give a correct result.

My D40 had no shims under the the stock screen. My D90 had two different shims. I'm wondering about putting in the new screen with just one shim and seeing if that makes it better or worse. Or fiddling with the adjustment cams.




Just remember, AF BF/FF issue and MF BF/FF issue are compeltely separate; one won't affect the other. Sounds like you have a MF BF issue, so the only way to fix it is to get a shim with the proper thickness. It's not the fault of the screen, but rather the camera itself.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just remember, AF BF/FF issue and MF BF/FF issue are compeltely separate; one won't affect the other. Sounds like you have a MF BF issue, so the only way to fix it is to get a shim with the proper thickness. It's not the fault of the screen, but rather the camera itself.[/quote]

OK, but how much thickness do you think to disappear the 6mm backfocus?


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used Scotch tape to shim my screen - it's about 0.05mm thick. I managed to get it as close as my eyesight can discern in my particular camera.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rick_oleson wrote:
I used Scotch tape to shim my screen - it's about 0.05mm thick. I managed to get it as close as my eyesight can discern in my particular camera.


Thanks Rick.
So you think it's safe to stick it on screens?
I am worried about the glue.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

horvlas wrote:
Just remember, AF BF/FF issue and MF BF/FF issue are compeltely separate; one won't affect the other. Sounds like you have a MF BF issue, so the only way to fix it is to get a shim with the proper thickness. It's not the fault of the screen, but rather the camera itself.


OK, but how much thickness do you think to disappear the 6mm backfocus?[/quote]


Well, those 6mm will depend on the focal length you used and from what distance Smile


FYI, I used a Super Takumar 50mm f1.4, shooting at a test chart from arouind 35 cm away, and the front focus was somewhere around 8-10mm. KatzEye did the calibration for me, and they had to change a 0.30mm shim to a 0.15mm shim.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rawhead wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote:
Having shot some test charts today, the AF (well, the green dot - I only have one AF lens and its a slow one) is fairly close, maybe a bit front focused, but its hard to tell because there is a range of focus where the dot is lit. So, lets say its ok.

The MF appears to be severely off, significant back focus.

To check I just did the same test with my D40 (which also has a split-prism screen); both the green dot and focusing by eye/prisms give similar results, with no significant back/front focus. In other words I can trust what my eyes tell me, to give a correct result.

My D40 had no shims under the the stock screen. My D90 had two different shims. I'm wondering about putting in the new screen with just one shim and seeing if that makes it better or worse. Or fiddling with the adjustment cams.




Just remember, AF BF/FF issue and MF BF/FF issue are compeltely separate; one won't affect the other.


Yes, that's why I reported the results separately for MF and AF, for each camera.

rawhead wrote:
Sounds like you have a MF BF issue, so the only way to fix it is to get a shim with the proper thickness. It's not the fault of the screen, but rather the camera itself.


That or adjusting the MF cam for the mirror stop.


PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
rick_oleson wrote:
I used Scotch tape to shim my screen - it's about 0.05mm thick. I managed to get it as close as my eyesight can discern in my particular camera.


Thanks Rick.
So you think it's safe to stick it on screens?
I am worried about the glue.


I didn't apply it to the screen, I applied it to the existing brass shim that had been in the camera with the stock screen. Of course, this only works if you need to increase thickness from the existing shim, which happen to be the case for me. There was a good deal of trial and test involved before I could call it finished.


PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rawhead wrote:
horvlas wrote:
Just remember, AF BF/FF issue and MF BF/FF issue are compeltely separate; one won't affect the other. Sounds like you have a MF BF issue, so the only way to fix it is to get a shim with the proper thickness. It's not the fault of the screen, but rather the camera itself.


FYI, I used a Super Takumar 50mm f1.4, shooting at a test chart from arouind 35 cm away, and the front focus was somewhere around 8-10mm. KatzEye did the calibration for me, and they had to change a 0.30mm shim to a 0.15mm shim.


I Used a Nikkor 1.4/50 at minimum focus distance ~0.5mm, it was 6mm backfocus, then Nikkor 2.5/105 around ~1m, again 6mm backfocus.
I calculated that around 0.1mm need for me by right of your calibration.


Which is the best test? Standard focal length ~50mm, or wide or tele? Minimal focal length or not?


PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

horvlas wrote:

Which is the best test? Standard focal length ~50mm, or wide or tele? Minimal focal length or not?



You don't want to go short, because they give you deeper apparent DoF, so it becomes hard to tell. Problem with going tele is that they tend to have large minimum focus distances, and they tend to be darker.

So, basically you want something that has super shallow DoF with relatively short minimum focus distance, which naturally makes 50mm lenses with f1.2/1.4/1.8 etc. apertures the optimum test lens.


PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Recently I noticed that, when I use a manual focus lens, each lens has different result with the split screen. Volna-9 and Industar-61 at minimum distance(0.2m) f2.8 almost perfect, Helios-44-7 2/58, f2 0.5m: 2mm backfocus. Nikkor 1.4/50 0.6m distance: 4-6mm backfocus. Why??? I also noticed, when I stop down manual mode the blades, the screen darks and the picture in the spit circle moves a bit, when I open the picture in the split circle moves back and displays good. Maybe a split screen fault? (I also noticed this fact with my split screened ZENIT)


PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's pretty weird, focusing screens are pretty simple things. All a focusing screen is, is a piece of frosted material located the same distance (through the mirror) as the film plane or image sensor from the lens mount. It doesn't know what lens you have mounted, and it doesn't move up or down when you change lenses. It seems it would either be located correctly (exactly matching the position of the sensor) or not, regardless of what lens you are using. Maybe I'm missing something.

As for the prism darkening when you stop down, of course that's what prisms do. When the lens is open (usually f/5.6 or larger, the cutoff point depends on the design of the specific screen), both sides of the prism are viewing through the lens - one sees light coming through the right hand portion of the lens, the other sees light coming through the left. When the diaphragm closes off the light paths that the prism is using, you begin to view the back side of the aperture blades through the prism. The split image is still doing what it's made to do, but what you are now looking at is black. The rest of the screen gradually darkens too, just because there is less light coming through the lens as you stop it down.


PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes I know it should darken, but the picture in the split circle is moving a bit to the left, so it displays splitted a bit, when I open to wide, the picture in the circle isn't splitted.