View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
angelo
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:53 pm Post subject: inherited lenses - any of those stand out ? |
|
|
angelo wrote:
Good day.
I have inherited canon T70 and a ZENIT E SLR's with some lenses.
I do intend to eventually use them, since i discovered the
nice world of manual lenses and film photography.
Following lenses were included, does any of those lenses
stand out in one way or another ? (quality/badness/anecdotal)
I dont really care about the price, these lenses will never be sold.
None of these lenses are really fast, but they do seem sturdy and
one good quality.
(but in no way as sharp through the viewfinder as my nikon D40
kit lenses - am i missing something ?)
CANON FD/FL
CANON FD 28mm f2.8
CANON FD 135mm f3.5 SSC
CANON FL 135mm f3.5
CANON FD 300mm f5.6 SSC
SIGMA 200mm XQ f3.5 multi-coated - quick and macro focus
KENKO 2X CFE TELEPLUS MC7 TELECONVERTER
PANAGOR AUTO TELE CONVERTER 2X CA
M42
PENTACON AUTO 29mm f2.8 (scar on lens coating)
HELIOS 44-2 58mm f2
TESSAR CARL ZEISS JENA DDR 50mm f2.8
PRAKTICAR PM MC PENTACON 70-210mm f4-5.6
VIVITAR T4 75-260mm f4,5 (tokina built - not sure if T4 or TX)
PRAKTICAR AUTO TELECONVERTER 2X
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Welcome! Thank you for joining us!
Please share photos taken with FD lenses , my knowledge is almost nothing about them. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 750 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 11:29 pm Post subject: Re: inherited lenses - any of those stand out ? |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
angelo wrote: |
CANON FD/FL
CANON FD 28mm f2.8
CANON FD 135mm f3.5 SSC
CANON FL 135mm f3.5
CANON FD 300mm f5.6 SSC
VIVITAR T4 75-260mm f4,5 (tokina built - not sure if T4 or TX)
|
Angelo,
The Canons can be habit forming. Best to pack them carefully and send them to me before you become infected.
If the Vivitar 75-260 has metal zoom and focus grips it is a T4. If rubber, it is TX.
Bill _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
The Pentacon, Helios, and Tessar are pure junk, let me dispose of them for you as well _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Of those I have -
Sigma XQ 200/3.5 - I have the slightly later version of this. Personally I think its not a good lens, it flares like crazy, but it does focus very close for a 200mm.
The Vivitar 75-260/4.5 isn't half bad, stop it down to f/8 or so.
The Helios has a great reputation as an "art" lens, and from what I have seen this rep is deserved. Use it wide-open to exploit the bokeh. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
I don't have any of your lens.
Try shooting them and you will know if they are any good. Better still You can send them to me and I will tell you if they are any good. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Canon FD lenses are said to be very good. We don't talk about them a lot, because it's very difficult to adapt them to a mdoern DSLR.
That's also the reason why you won't get the money for them that they are worth.
So, better keep them and use them!
And perhaps a Micro-4/3 cam will enable you to shoot with them digitally one day... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
As mentioned before
You can use the FD´s only with an adapter Fd>Eos but you will lose infinity. You have only 50 cm or something like this.
Or you use an adapter with an add. lens, then you have infinity but you lose a lot of quality. Best you use these lenses analog with your t70.
Here is a picture with Canon 5DMkII and FD 2.8/135 S.C.
Rolf _________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
angelo
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
angelo wrote:
Thanks for the great advise.
I will assume those lenses are alrightish.
Also thank you for clearing up the T4/TX thingy, it is a T4 (and damn
heavy). I was also very impressed by the focus distance of
SIGMA 200mm XQ f3.5, it can focus from quite close.
I will let you all know some feedback from the lenses once my
M42-nikonF adaptor comes and when i develop shooted films
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|