| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mr_tibbs2004
Joined: 23 Jul 2021
Posts: 141
Location: United States
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:50 pm Post subject: TTartisans 50mm f1.4 ASPH |
 |
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
Does anyone have experience with this lens? I just ordered one and am not finding a lot of reviews on it. Here is the official website for the lens and here and here are a couple of glowing reviews of the lens. From those two reviews it seems to be a little too good for the money so I decided to try yet another 50mm! If anyone has any real world experience I would love to see some results! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017
Posts: 291
Location: наша раша
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
I've had him for three years. A very good 50mm for your money, but a manual focus. My samples:
https://flic.kr/s/aHsmWxpYGE
https://photos.app.goo.gl/S2ppSyij9NHtL6X47
p/s Now I'm selling it because I'm switching to l-mount.
_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3213
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2024 12:33 pm Post subject: Re: TTartisans 50mm f1.4 ASPH |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| mr_tibbs2004 wrote: |
| Does anyone have experience with this lens? I just ordered one and am not finding a lot of reviews on it. Here is the official website for the lens and here and here are a couple of glowing reviews of the lens. From those two reviews it seems to be a little too good for the money so I decided to try yet another 50mm! If anyone has any real world experience I would love to see some results! |
Here's a test I did against the Mamiya EF 50/1.4:
https://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-ef-50mm-f-1-4-vs-tt-artisan-50mm-f-1-4-asph-t84633.html
There's little to complain about, it's a very good lens. Only a fairly long MFD (70cm).
EDIT: shorter mfd of 50cm apparently with Sony mnt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004
Joined: 23 Jul 2021
Posts: 141
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
The lens arrived a couple of days early. Initial thought is this is going to be a fun lens. It's also a very heavy bugger! I'm looking forward to playing with this lens more!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3213
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| mr_tibbs2004 wrote: |
The lens arrived a couple of days early. Initial thought is this is going to be a fun lens. It's also a very heavy bugger! I'm looking forward to playing with this lens more!
|
Very nice !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 1674
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Renders pretty much alike 1.4 Minoltas, does not it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11046
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Why does M-mount cost $90 more than E-mount?
M-mount https://www.amazon.com/TTArtisan-50mm-F1-4-ASPH-M-Mount/dp/B08HJNV9CN/
The two mounts don't even look like the same lens!
https://www.ttartisan.com/?list_9/126.html
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3213
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Just guessing, but maybe because it’s a smaller market? I had the M Mount version by the way, because it could fit my Techart Pro AF adapter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017
Posts: 291
Location: наша раша
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
The M mount is made using a different technology, specifically for a rangefinder camera, which is somewhat more expensive, as the manufacturer himself says.
_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004
Joined: 23 Jul 2021
Posts: 141
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
As I do not yet own an M mount adapter I bought the E mount version. I wonder what the weight difference is because this lens is definitely heavy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 199
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2024 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
The M-mount version requires the rangefinder coupling cam, and that part has to be quite precise. Definitely more expensive to build and calibrate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11046
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
 Thanks for answers!!!
Well if I didn't already have Techart AF adapter I'd consider spending a little more for Sony Planar T* FE 50mm f/1.4 ZA Lens.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
