View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:20 am Post subject: Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8 still life |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
I'm experimenting with still life photography. Still struggling with the lighting a bit, there's a lot to be learned. Lens is Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8, camera Sony A7R2.
TopcorRE10028Teapot by devoscasper, on Flickr _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 580 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8 still life |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
I'm experimenting with still life photography. Still struggling with the lighting a bit, there's a lot to be learned. Lens is Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8, camera Sony A7R2.
|
The technical part seems perfect to me, and the lens is beyond doubt. For the more properly artistic part, the result is already very pleasing, but if the idea is to recall pictorial still lifes, I would say that more extensive areas of shadow, particularly in the background, could help |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 895
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:22 pm Post subject: Re: Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8 still life |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Ultrapix wrote: |
caspert79 wrote: |
I'm experimenting with still life photography. Still struggling with the lighting a bit, there's a lot to be learned. Lens is Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8, camera Sony A7R2.
|
The technical part seems perfect to me, and the lens is beyond doubt. For the more properly artistic part, the result is already very pleasing, but if the idea is to recall pictorial still lifes, I would say that more extensive areas of shadow, particularly in the background, could help |
Looks great. One path for additional progress might be focus stacking which I never practised. _________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 2:40 pm Post subject: Re: Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8 still life |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
lumens pixel wrote: |
Ultrapix wrote: |
caspert79 wrote: |
I'm experimenting with still life photography. Still struggling with the lighting a bit, there's a lot to be learned. Lens is Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8, camera Sony A7R2.
|
The technical part seems perfect to me, and the lens is beyond doubt. For the more properly artistic part, the result is already very pleasing, but if the idea is to recall pictorial still lifes, I would say that more extensive areas of shadow, particularly in the background, could help |
Looks great. One path for additional progress might be focus stacking which I never practised. |
True, definitely worth considering! _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 2:56 pm Post subject: Re: Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8 still life |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Ultrapix wrote: |
caspert79 wrote: |
I'm experimenting with still life photography. Still struggling with the lighting a bit, there's a lot to be learned. Lens is Topcor RE 100mm f/2.8, camera Sony A7R2.
|
The technical part seems perfect to me, and the lens is beyond doubt. For the more properly artistic part, the result is already very pleasing, but if the idea is to recall pictorial still lifes, I would say that more extensive areas of shadow, particularly in the background, could help |
Thanks, yes you're right. This background turned out to be too light. But a darker one is on its way. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 523 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Should the lace be out of focus?
I think I'd prefer it if everything was equally sharp … except maybe the background.
Just my tuppence worth … |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
Should the lace be out of focus?
I think I'd prefer it if everything was equally sharp … except maybe the background.
Just my tuppence worth … |
Yes, you're absolutely right. Hence the suggestion about the stacking software. F/11 is not enough to obtain enough DOF, and I like to avoid smaller apertures. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Shriver
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2022 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
I like the compression of depth due to the 100mm lens.
That was always one of my favorite Topcors! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Found out how to do focus stacking in Photoshop without the use of dedicated stacking software. Used 4 pictures taken at f/5.6 to do the stacking. For whoever is interested:
- File > Scripts > load file into stack
- Use: select 'files' --> select your images you want to stack > OK
- Each image will be assigned to a separate layer
- Select all layers in the layers panel
- Edit > auto align layers > auto align > OK
- Edit > auto blend layers > select 'stack images', check 'Seamless Tones and Colors' and 'Content Aware Fill Transparent Areas' --> OK
This is the result (btw, lens in this case is Canon EF 100mm f/2):
CanonEF10028stilllifeflowersStackedsmall by devoscasper, on Flickr _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Great results, congrats! For me both images look very good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2539
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Better. Background doesn't distract anymore. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 580 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
Better. Background doesn't distract anymore. |
I used a different background here which is much further behind the subject. It makes it easier to control background shadow and light independently from the subject. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11069 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
I think better results could be had by moving back to increase DOF and cropping to same frame.
The top flower looks fuzzy.
Both images are most excellent imho, but I think you can and will eventually do better. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
I think better results could be had by moving back to increase DOF and cropping to same frame.
The top flower looks fuzzy.
Both images are most excellent imho, but I think you can and will eventually do better. |
I just looked at the original size file, but I don't see fuzziness. But some red tones are difficult to render and therefore seem to show less texture. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11069 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
I think better results could be had by moving back to increase DOF and cropping to same frame.
The top flower looks fuzzy.
Both images are most excellent imho, but I think you can and will eventually do better. |
I just looked at the original size file, but I don't see fuzziness. But some red tones are difficult to render and therefore seem to show less texture. |
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Fine work and an excellent lens, always liked it!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
xaprb
Joined: 28 Jan 2021 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2022 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xaprb wrote:
Both images “pop†off my screen and are quite compelling IMO. Very nice. Can you discuss the lighting and any other technical aspects of getting these results? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2022 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
xaprb wrote: |
Both images “pop†off my screen and are quite compelling IMO. Very nice. Can you discuss the lighting and any other technical aspects of getting these results? |
Thank you.
I don't quite remember the setup of the first image, but the second I do remember.
Big softbox on the left side, pointing to the right. Background board on the table behind the subject. A black board is blocking the light on the left half of the background. Focus stacking used in Photoshop to get adequate DOF.
Here are two more recent still lives with improved setup (lens Canon EF 100/2):
CanonEF100f2StillLifeSmall by devoscasper, on Flickr
CanonEF1002StillLifeFruitsSmall by devoscasper, on Flickr
Here, a background drop is used instead of a board. There is space between the table and background drop to create separation and to better control background lighting (to create contrast with shadow side of subject). Softbox on the left. Background lighted with seperate flash. In the last image, the flash is covered with thin paper to make the effect softer. Focus stacking in Photoshop. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
excellent composition, colors & sharpness. Great lens, too! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1275
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
Found out how to do focus stacking in Photoshop without the use of dedicated stacking software. Used 4 pictures taken at f/5.6 to do the stacking. For whoever is interested:
- File > Scripts > load file into stack
- Use: select 'files' --> select your images you want to stack > OK
- Each image will be assigned to a separate layer
- Select all layers in the layers panel
- Edit > auto align layers > auto align > OK
- Edit > auto blend layers > select 'stack images', check 'Seamless Tones and Colors' and 'Content Aware Fill Transparent Areas' --> OK
This is the result (btw, lens in this case is Canon EF 100mm f/2):
CanonEF10028stilllifeflowersStackedsmall by devoscasper, on Flickr |
Impressive results , and in this case , it's not because the lens that much ,but more the settings of the light, colours , miss en place, etc ,and edition of course. I've been trying same thing on macro shots (8-16 images with not good results, byt the images with only 4 shots would be easily to get better results. Is there any recommendation relating how many shots to put together to get less failures? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3232 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
Impressive results , and in this case , it's not because the lens that much ,but more the settings of the light, colours , miss en place, etc ,and edition of course. I've been trying same thing on macro shots (8-16 images with not good results, byt the images with only 4 shots would be easily to get better results. Is there any recommendation relating how many shots to put together to get less failures? |
I guess it depends quite a bit on the amount of focus breathing a lens has. I was not able to eliminate artefacts when using the Yashica ML 55/2.8 for example. The same problem with the Tokina 100/2.8 (internal focus version). With the Canon EF 100/2 no problems whatsoever. Today I received a simple 240mm macro slide that will hopefully make my other lenses work as well for this purpose. I don’t know if there ‘s an optimum amount of images to put in a focus stack, but in my last image I used 15 pictures at f/8 with no problems whatsoever:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/55691955@N05/2f81w043c6
But again, this was the Canon lens that I mentioned. _________________ For Sale:
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1275
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Interesting I've been using micro 55mm 2.8 on FF, but same lens on APSC only 4 shots worked better |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|