View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
... _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS
Last edited by Pancolart on Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gabriel
Joined: 01 Sep 2009 Posts: 2 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gabriel wrote:
As I had some doubts that the Porst 55/1.2 PK could be using the same formula as the Tomioka 55/1.2, I opened mine:
This is the rear optics of the lens. On the right the outer rear element, on the left a block which is behind the diaphragm (diaphragm should be on top of it). This is a block of 3 elements, including two cemented ones (the black line is between those two elements).
Verdict: 4 rear elements, including two cemented ones. With the 3 front elements that is a total of 7 elements and not 6, which points to the fact that it could indeed be the same formula as the Tomioka 55/1.2. _________________ Pic-a-day 2008/2009 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Some 1,2/50-55 lenses have 7 elements. But we have to see if the distance between elements, class and curvature of glass, location of the blades, etc, are the same too.
Difficult things. Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Thank you very much. I hope this will end the doubts of this discussion:
http://forum.mflenses.com/so-i-got-this-from-a-2nd-hand-site-porst-55-1-2-t22842,start,75.html _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:25 am Post subject: Auto Mamiya/Sekor 55mm F1.4 (Cosina) |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
I'm currently pretty intrigued with Cosina-made all-black touch-radioactive Mamiya/Sekor 55mm F1.4.
Just as I've guessed from Flickr shots, it is not that good when it comes to carrying bokeh quality into the distance, but relative close ups are ranging from ok to impressive.
Inside, it's a solid build too.
My question is: was there ever a multicoated 55/1.4 by Cosina? (under any branding)
I'm aware of multicoated Tomiokas, and Mamiya-made 55/1.4s are likely all multicoated, but I'm interested in this exact optical block.
I haven't found one so far, but it was produced in so many shells and under so many brands, I might be missing some. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Maybe the Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4.
While mine are not labelled MC, the coatings look multi coated to me.
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
This Porst seems the be Multi-coated and Cosina
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/605-porst-color-reflex-mc-auto-55mm-f-1-4-16-v1
and here a Super Carenar: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/1367-carenar-super-carenar-mc-55mm-f-1-4-16
Here is a post of a Tomioka made Multi coated Chinon and A single coated Cosina. https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/porst-and-cosina-55mm-f-1-4--m42--50205
The Cosina multi-coateds don't seem to have the distinctive green coating layer.
There is a lot of confusion on the Internet over what is Tomioka and what Cosina. The main difference in probably the aperture ring. Lenses with red diamond focus marks are probably always Tomioka. If it has a Lolipop it depends on the aperture ring. I think Cosina and Tomioka problaby coöperated. Their are Tomioka branded Cosinas. Probably Tomioka glass in a Cosina body. _________________ pentaxian
Last edited by D1N0 on Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:12 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Maybe the Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4.
While mine are not labelled MC, the coatings look multi coated to me.
Tom |
Is there a sure way to tell if is something is MC or not?
Among the many 55/1.4 Reuvenons that existed I think just these two were by Cosina:
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/554-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-16-v4a
Is yours one of these?
The Revuenon labelled as MC is definitely Tomioka. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
Is there a sure way to tell if is something is MC or not? |
Looks like on the internet people are counting reflection colors while shining flashlight into the lens.
Using this method, two supposedly SC lenses I have (Mamiya 55/1.4 and Helios 44-2), indeed have only two color reflections.
But my pre-MC Zuiko 100/2.8 has 3-colored reflections. So I'm not sure how accurate this is.
Could be that I'm in possession of a non-MC-labelled Zuiko from an early multicoated batch, or this coating detection method just doesn't work.
Having more SC lenses would have helped, but mine are overwhelmingly multicoated. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Thank you! _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
OK, I have two.
Neither is marked MC, but the coatings look multicoated not single coated.
Both have the flat rear element of the Tomioka design
Tom
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
|
So it is a v4b by m42 database classification: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22
I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
I see some tell-tale DNA of distance scale, markings, fonts and shape of the A/M switch, which implies my Mamiya/Sekor was made by the same company.
This does not guarantee the optics to be the same, but the shell for both was made by the same people. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
|
So it is a v4b by m42 database classification: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/266-revuenon-auto-revuenon-55mm-f-1-4-22
I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
I see some tell-tale DNA of distance scale, markings, fonts and shape of the A/M switch, which implies my Mamiya/Sekor was made by the same company.
This does not guarantee the optics to be the same, but the shell for both was made by the same people. |
I think both Tomioka but different body design. The Cosinas have an aperture ring that protrudes over the focus scale with a cut out of about a third of the ring for viewing the focus marks. I Also have a Yashinon-DS 50mm 1.7 with an identical rubber grip to the left lens (Yashica owned Tomioka). The right lens seems to be a Revuenon or maybe Chinon. What is the branding on the left one? _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alex TG
Joined: 13 Oct 2019 Posts: 221 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex TG wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
|
That lens literally screams "I'm Cosina!". It's like 268% Cosina. At least.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1662
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Alex TG wrote: |
aidaho wrote: |
I'd say the left shell was made by Cosina.
|
That lens literally screams "I'm Cosina!". It's like 268% Cosina. At least.
|
I think so.
The DOF marks are in the Mamiya (cosina) way.
The right one has tomioka's marks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
I've found a good SX 55mm 1.4 mamiya for good price , but already have sime other 1.4 , so I am wondering if this one would really be any different to Nikon, mamiya ef, FD SSC etc, not in sharpness but in character? The 135 SX is a very nice one and could pair it with the 55mm, of course is only an excuse ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
A note of 55mm f1.2 lenses. There are at least three that I know of. There is the famous M42 Tomioka, sold under the names (at least) Tominon, Yashinon, Cosinon. Then there is the Porst, also sold under several names. Then there is another Cosina lens, sold as Revuenon MC or Cosina MC, that was made in PK mount. The supposition was that this is also a Tomioka design. It can be identified by having a 58mm front filter ring, instead of the 55mm thread of the Porst. For me personally, this last one is the best of the lot. Here are some shots with that one
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#1
#2
#3
#4
_________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Wow, you're really applied a lot of processing to those images. That makes it impossible to tell much about the character of the lens you used. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Wow, you're really applied a lot of processing to those images. That makes it impossible to tell much about the character of the lens you used. |
Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost. I'm definitely not a SOOC guy, not with modern lenses and not with vintage lenses. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Microcontrast has a lot of influence on bokeh as you can see in these images. I am not a fan of using it in images with a lot of OOF areas. When a lens is very sharp and contrasty by itself you can use it to smoothen busier bokeh a bit without loosing too much subject contrast. Enhanced definition in OOF areas just makes it grainy and busier. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
Depends on one's taste, I'd say. My particular taste runs to really busy, nisen bokeh YMMV _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
kymarto wrote: |
Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost.. |
Please don't take us for fools by blatant lying.
Those images have been very heavily processed, anyone can see that.
So heavily that it makes no difference what lens was used. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
kymarto wrote: |
Not much processing. Slight sharpening and microcontrast boost.. |
Please don't take us for fools by blatant lying.
Those images have been very heavily processed, anyone can see that.
So heavily that it makes no difference what lens was used. |
Nope. It makes an absolute difference which lens was used. Processing does nothing but enhance what is already there. It cannot create anything. I have a few f1.2 lenses, and they all respond differently to what processing I do. I'll give you an example, since I don't have the Cosina with me. Here is a shot SOOC and then with my typical processing, shot with the Aires Coral-S 4.5cm f1.5 lens. If you think you could get a similar result with the majority of lenses of this focal length, you are dead wrong.
#2
#1
_________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.2
#1
#2
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
kymarto wrote: |
Nope. It makes an absolute difference which lens was used. Processing does nothing but enhance what is already there. It cannot create anything. I have a few f1.2 lenses, and they all respond differently to what processing I do. I'll give you an example, since I don't have the Cosina with me. Here is a shot SOOC and then with my typical processing, shot with the Aires Coral-S 4.5cm f1.5 lens. If you think you could get a similar result with the majority of lenses of this focal length, you are dead wrong. |
So you lied about the original images you posted and are now compounding that lie by refusing to admit you lied.
You processed the hell out of those images and it was really obvious.
No way are you going to get away with lying like that here, we are far too experienced to not spot such obvious heavy processing. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|