View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I forgot to mention this: Something is really wonky about this lens, Peter. I have a bunch of those $4 M42 to K adapters from China that allow infinity focus but also are mis-threaded so the lens over-rotates about 1/3 turn. This lens doesn't. It lines up perfectly. It also lines up perfectly on the M42 to EF adapter on the RT and on the Mamaiya/Sekor's native threads. What gives? I would expect it to under-rotate 1/3 turn on everything else if it lines up perfectly on the K adapters. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kukhuvud
Joined: 01 Sep 2011 Posts: 96 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kukhuvud wrote:
I'm looking forward to receiving the 2nd lens! This is great fun _________________
DSLR: Canon 5D MKIII
SLR: Voigtl�nder Bessaflex (Black), Pentax Spotmatic SP
Rangefinder: FED-2
Meyer: Oreston 50/1.8, Lydith 30/3.5, Orestegon 28/2.8
EOS: 24-70/2.8L, 85/1.2L II, 50/1.2L II, 100/2.8L Macro, 135/2.0L
Russians: Helios-40/1.5 (Silver), Mir 20M/3.5, Industar-26m 50/2.8
Takumar: S-M-C Takumar 50/1.4
Flickr: [url=http://www.envision.la[/url]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
David wrote: |
I forgot to mention this: Something is really wonky about this lens, Peter. I have a bunch of those $4 M42 to K adapters from China that allow infinity focus but also are mis-threaded so the lens over-rotates about 1/3 turn. This lens doesn't. It lines up perfectly. It also lines up perfectly on the M42 to EF adapter on the RT and on the Mamaiya/Sekor's native threads. What gives? I would expect it to under-rotate 1/3 turn on everything else if it lines up perfectly on the K adapters. |
I didn't try the lens or even mount it before I sent it off to kukhuvud. Sounds weird, I'll be looking at that when it eventually arrives here!
C'mon - pics, we want pics! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
more pics to come this weekend! I develop film on Saturdays. In the interim, there's a whole album of pics linked in my post. I just don't want to post tons of pics from each camera and hog the thread. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
We're not looking for art here
The idea is to go and shoot pictures, quick and in one go if possible. Let's see what the lens can do. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I wouldn't be able to ship it till Saturday anyway, so I figured why not make the most of it this week. Better to be out and about than sitting home this week. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
Here are my definitive five photos from the Super Travenar! One note, I haven't gotten the Kodak Gold developed yet, so if a photo from that roll is stunning, I may post one more tomorrow.
Also, I have some great shotrs from the Mamiya Sekor outing, but need to thin the negatives first. Holy cow are they overexposed. Silly stupid overcast skies.
1- Building
2- Portrait
3- Street Scene
4- Close up
5- Landscape
I had the hardest time getting a landscape with this lens. For some reason, none of my landscapes were any good. Also, this lens is very contrast-heavy in monochrome. Here's a link to the album of photos with the Canon RT:
https://picasaweb.google.com/102333270936007447976/RT11712
And here's the Pentax K-7 photos:
https://picasaweb.google.com/102333270936007447976/K711612
And here for the Mamiya/Sekor 1000DTL (almost none turned out.)
https://picasaweb.google.com/102333270936007447976/MS11912
Lastly, for the K1000:
https://picasaweb.google.com/102333270936007447976/K1K11812
*Edit to add K1000 link*
Friday I ended up not taking the lens out for a fifth day because of the rain. I figured no one would be pleased with me if I shipped it with moisture inside and it molded. Anyway, it is on it's way now to Cooltouch. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM
Last edited by David on Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Folks, you some nice shots here with that "crappy" lens. I like David's one on 3- Street Scene best. Man that Super Travenar is really bad!! To my eyes, it is way worst than the Optomax 28/2.8. When stopped, you get really nice clear picture and quiet sharp too. It seems to me that one of the lens elements may be de-centered! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I m in.
just a few questions/clarification:
Can i do whatever mean to bring the best result out of the lenses or is there limitation?
I don't do photoshop, but some adjustment of black level, wb, minor sharpening should be ok right?
Filters, hood, bellow, whatever addon is ok right?
Any limitation of image size?
With this speed, I think i'll have the lenses in autumn.
decentered element you say? _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11028 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Anybody have news from Michael (cooltouch)? I hope all is well... _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
We're trying to reach out to him. He hasn't posted in a while. Last I heard from him was 21 January when I let him know the lens was coming. I sure hope everything is okay, too. He's a pretty frequent user, so to simply disappear is concerning. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I still haven't heard from Michael. My PM is still in my outbox and he hasn't replied to the letter David sent him by post over a week ago. I'm sorry for everyone waiting. I don't know what else to do now, it's very frustrating. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
PLEASE NOTE - THE CHALLENGE IS NOW CANCELLED
I'm grateful to the members who passed the lenses on to the next person quickly, but very sadly not everyone has co-operated and the delays are too long. I wanted all this to be snappy (pun not intended) so it could be completed before I go on extended vacation to Australia, but at this rate it will take over two years before everyone has tried all the lenses.
There are two members currently holding lenses and both have had them for over a month. One of them answered my PM a week ago but still hasn't sent the lens on as requested. The other has disappeared altogether - my PM of 23 Jan is still in my Outbox, he hasn't responded to a letter 2 weeks ago and a phone call was unsuccessful. I'm very disappointed they don't share my wish to avoid keeping people waiting. I didn't expect to have to keep chasing people and I'm not willing to continue.
If, like me, you are still waiting to try the lenses I'm very sorry to disappoint you.
Special thanks to David for the help and support he gave me trying to get in touch with Michael, and to anyone else who has helped. I will send PMs to each of the current lensholders giving instructions where to return them to their owners but I can't guarantee you'll ever see them again.
_________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Okay, first off, I guess I should start off by apologizing that I dropped the ball here. I got caught up in a project over a month ago that basically monopolized all my time, but still that isn't a good excuse. I should have made the time to get out and take a few pics and then pass the Travenar along. Instead, it sat on my desk, forgotten, as I ran myself ragged on this project. I haven't even had the time to check my email until a few days ago. Unfortunately, the project still isn't complete, but at least I made a crucial deadline a few days ago, and now at least some of the time pressure is off my shoulders.
My apologies especially to Peter and also to the rest of you for stalling out on this Challenge. I am perfectly willing to pass the Travenar along to the next person in line if you folks would like to see the challenge continue. I have contacted Peter via PM, informing him of my situation, and his last reply to me was that he was giving some thoughts to the matter.
I don't mind admitting that I'm an outdoor photographer. Always have been and likely always will be. To compound matters, the weather around these parts has been miserable for the past month or so -- cold, overcast, and rainy. Finally, we're starting to get some sun. This being Houston, it means that by late February winter is over and most of the trees are leafing out and flowering shrubs are already in full bloom. I took advantage of this situation yesterday, and managed to capture shots of some of our flowering shrubs with the Travenar and my Focal 28mm f/2.8, which I have also offered to distribute as another cheapo challenge lens (I bought it for $3). Me, I think the differences between the two lenses are quite interesting. Both are a tad soft wide upon, but quite sharp when stopped down to f/8. Wide open, though, their behaviors are quite different. The Focal exhibits nice discrete, round OOF highlights for its bokeh, whereas the Travenar is a lens that tends to produce swirly bokeh with its OOF highlights.
In my next post here, I'd like to show images taken with the Travenar at f/2.8 and f/8, and I'd also like to add the images I took with the Focal 28mm for comparison. But perhaps I should start a separate thread for the Focal? Does anyone still care to see the Challenge continue? _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I'm really looking forward to your shots and all the others yet to come. I might counsel to place the Focal shots in that challenge thread and link each post to the other. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I am just glad you are ok and it was only work that kept you away. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
My apologies especially to Peter and also to the rest of you for stalling out on this Challenge. |
Thank you Michael, apology accepted.
Quote: |
In my next post here, I'd like to show images taken with the Travenar at f/2.8 and f/8, and I'd also like to add the images I took with the Focal 28mm for comparison. But perhaps I should start a separate thread for the Focal? Does anyone still care to see the Challenge continue? |
Please go ahead and post the Travenar pictures here.
I have already started a thread for the Focal lens - Challenge No 3. You're welcome to post your pictures there by all means, but it should have started with Carsten and you will have another chance to take pictures with it when your turn comes later. I think the best thing to do is to send it off to Carsten straight away.
I have been busy myself the last few days but I will try to post a poll-type message later today to get people's views on continuing the Challenges. If the majority want me to carry on I think there needs to be one or two conditions. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11028 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Fearing the worst and hoping for the best, the best pops up once in a while! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
PLEASE NOTE - THE CHALLENGE IS NOW ACTIVE AGAIN _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Are people taking this seriously ? I certainly hope not !
My initial idea was to send the lens around and for people to just get out there and use it in one session, no filters, no PP, and pick the best results of a few basic types of techniques. I think it's interesting to see how different people use an unknown lens, and see the results from the lens AND the photographer, not from the processing.
It's interesting. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Okay, I'm finally getting to check back in. Following are some shots I took with the Travenar. Just a few grab shots -- they're pretty short on photographic aesthetics. As Peter recommended, I will go ahead and send the Focal off to Carsten, and will hold off uploading my images. Both the Focal and the Travenar will be going out in tomorrow's post.
Subject: A variety of azalea flowers taken with the Travenar. They are in pairs, the first shot at f/2.8, and the second at f/8. I think you'll see what I mean about the swirly bokeh and the slight softness at f/2.8, both of which are gone by f/8. The Camera is a 10.1 mp Canon XS (1000D). I used Live View to insure reasonably accurate focusing. All images, except for the rose, were taken at ISO 100; the rose was shot at ISO 400. Other than reducing image size for display here, no PP was done.
Oh, and a solitary yellow rose.
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Just a quick update. The Travenar went out in yesterday's mail to David. It went via USPS Priority Mail, so David, look for it tomorrow or Monday. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Just a quick update. The Travenar went out in yesterday's mail to David. It went via USPS Priority Mail, so David, look for it tomorrow or Monday. |
Thanks Michael, I asked you to send it to visualopsins, not David. Is that a typo?
Did you send the Focal to Carsten? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Sorry for the confusion -- and my balky memory. Yes, the Travenar went out to Eugene in California. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pst
Joined: 25 Aug 2010 Posts: 108 Location: Austria
Expire: 2013-08-17
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pst wrote:
Hi!
Unfortunatly I have been off MFlenses for some months, due to work. But, now I'm back.
When I left, the challenge seemed quite dead. It's alive now, albeit somewhat chaotic
After reading this thread, I take it, there are two lenses going round, the Travenar and the Focal. Peter PMd me, that I'll be up for the Travenar soon! How cool, looking forward to that!
To get back into the swing of things, can someone post links, to the running threads, I don't know what to look for anymore - "cheap lens" "crap lens"...???
EDIT: Stupid me, I just found the threads in the Café.
Many thanks! _________________ Regards, Patrick. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|