View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
?? What is wrong with the photos? And colors??
Why awful? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
?? What is wrong with the photos? And colors??
Why awful? |
He was kidding. Look at his alias, he's a big fan of Fujinon lenses _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Forums and internet still have room for improvement
It's not easy to detect humor like body language, face, tonal... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
That's true. It is so easy to misunderstand someone when you're not talking eye to eye. Especially humour and/or sarcasm can be tricky. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Just one letter left out - an "e"
Awe-Full .... full of awe!
Nice lenses, nice results too.
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fujinonuser
Joined: 06 Jan 2011 Posts: 128 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:18 pm Post subject: AWEful |
|
|
Fujinonuser wrote:
My apologies to hoanpham and other members of this forum. Of course I wanted to express my admiration and gratitude to hoanpham for his great pictures and for sharing them with us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Over the Xmouse break, I was lucky enough to find a Fujinon EBC 55mm f1.8
This is my only Fujinon so I can't compare it with other Fujinons ..... BUT ........... if they are all this good or better, then they are truly top shelf.
Here are some quick and dirty images on K-10D
100% crop:
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MuchoFlavorStudio
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 Posts: 1 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
MuchoFlavorStudio wrote:
Hi, does anybody know if the Fujinon T EBC 135mm 3.5 lens is radioactive? I got it today and I find it pretty sharp. Not amazing bokeh but it seems like a solid portrait lens. Love the size and construction and it came with a metallic hood that makes it look hot. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spiralcity
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 1207 Location: Chicago, U.S.A
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
spiralcity wrote:
MuchoFlavorStudio wrote: |
Hi, does anybody know if the Fujinon T EBC 135mm 3.5 lens is radioactive? I got it today and I find it pretty sharp. Not amazing bokeh but it seems like a solid portrait lens. Love the size and construction and it came with a metallic hood that makes it look hot. Thanks. |
The bokeh on your lens should be creamy smooth, the lens sharp as a razor, and the colors quite vibrant. I have owned that lens for the better part of 10 years and it performs well above average.
_________________ Nikons : F4-EM-FG-FE2-FA-EL-FTN-N2020-N70-F Nikkorex
Fujica: ST605N-ST701-ST705-ST705W-ST801-ST901-AZ1-AX-3
Chinon: CE4s-CM4s-CM5
Pentax: ME-Soptmatic
Ricoh:XR6
Pentax- K10D
Lenses- M42's-Nikon F mount, Pentax PK
FREE PHOTOGRAPHY COURSE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
quidam
Joined: 28 Sep 2012 Posts: 223 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
quidam wrote:
MuchoFlavorStudio wrote: |
Hi, does anybody know if the Fujinon T EBC 135mm 3.5 lens is radioactive? |
My Fujinon EBC 135 / 3.5 is not yellowish compared to the Fujinon EBC 100 / 2.8. The latter is radioactive. But they are both excellent lenses. Beautiful colors and very sharp. _________________ Sony Nex 5 & 6, Sony A7II. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I think the vast majority of radioactive lenses are wides and normals. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spiralcity
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 1207 Location: Chicago, U.S.A
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
spiralcity wrote:
I'm stealing this from flickr, it was posted by our member Arkku, take it for what it's worth.
The following lenses are not radioactive:
• “new style†(rubber focusing ring) non-EBC Fujinon 50mm f/1.4
• “new style†(rubber focusing ring without “stripes†or gaps between knobs) EBC Fujinon 50mm f/1.4
• Fujinon 55mm f/1.6
• any of the four styles of 55mm f/1.8 Fujinon, EBC or non-EBC
Out of the 50 and 55mm Fujinons I have tested, only the “old style†(silver-coloured aperture ring) non-EBC 50mm f/1.4 is radioactive. (edit: there is also a relatively rare EBC version that is radioactive)
I measured.
edit: I've since seen one person claim to have measured an EBC 50mm f/1.4 Fujinon and to have found it radioactive. I have measured two EBCs and one “new style†non-EBC and they were not radioactive. This raises an interesting question: are some rare versions of the EBC 50mm f/1.4 Fujinon radioactive?
edit 2: Turns out that there is a (relatively) rare EBC 50mm f/1.4 version that is radioactive: it is the one which has gaps between the knobs in its rubber focusing ring, i.e., the focusing ring has a “striped†or “segmented†look rather than uniform knobs all around. This lens is a different optical design than the later (much more common) EBC 50mm f/1.4, since it also differs in size and weight. _________________ Nikons : F4-EM-FG-FE2-FA-EL-FTN-N2020-N70-F Nikkorex
Fujica: ST605N-ST701-ST705-ST705W-ST801-ST901-AZ1-AX-3
Chinon: CE4s-CM4s-CM5
Pentax: ME-Soptmatic
Ricoh:XR6
Pentax- K10D
Lenses- M42's-Nikon F mount, Pentax PK
FREE PHOTOGRAPHY COURSE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I have a Fujinon 1.6/55 in X mount that is very good but sadly has some grease on the back of the front element that gives a patch of the image a soft glowy look, one in good condition would be a great lens I think.
The 19mm Fujinon is supposed to be superb. |
The 55 / 1.6 is a really nice lens, is it the best lens I've got in the 50ish range? I don't know....maybe with some test chart pixel peeping a comparison would find a winner? But the Fujinon X is certainly up there with best.
Shot wide open on Sony A6000. I like the bokeh from this lens, it can do bubbles, but it's not pronounced.
_________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Sadly that grease spot or whatever it was could not be cleaned off my 1.6/55. I do have two copies of the 1.6/50 and really like it. I also had a copy of the 1.6/50 3-4 years ago and it was awful, didn't get remotely sharp until f4 and then was still not very sharp, had very strong CA. Obviously, it was a duffer. I also have 2.8/35 and 3.5/28 X-Fujinons and like those too, particularly the vivid colours. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Yes, I have had the 1.6/55 and the 1.8/55.
I rate the 1.8/55 as the better lens all round and this one I kept - the 1.6/55 wasn't as good in my opinion, even though I have seen beautiful images taken by others with it.
I onsold the 1.6/55
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The 1.8/55 didn't make it into the X-Fujinon era, probably it was too expensive to manufacture. The 1.9/50 and 2.2/55 X-Fujinons are rather underwhelming, it's the 1.6/55 and 1.6/50 X-Fujinons that are the good ones. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The 1.8/55 didn't make it into the X-Fujinon era, probably it was too expensive to manufacture. The 1.9/50 and 2.2/55 X-Fujinons are rather underwhelming, it's the 1.6/55 and 1.6/50 X-Fujinons that are the good ones. |
Yes, that's right Ian - I should have mentioned that the 1.8/55 is of M42 mount
Cheers
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 291 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
Quote: |
The 55 / 1.6 is a really nice lens, is it the best lens I've got in the 50ish range? I don't know.... |
You have a lot of different 50mm ? Me too, both versions of the 50 and 55mm 1.6 but I don't have many 50mm lenses to assess objectively.
Showed like.
50мм 1.6 ebc
55мм 1.6 ebc
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The 1.8/55 didn't make it into the X-Fujinon era, probably it was too expensive to manufacture. The 1.9/50 and 2.2/55 X-Fujinons are rather underwhelming, it's the 1.6/55 and 1.6/50 X-Fujinons that are the good ones. |
Yes, that's right Ian - I should have mentioned that the 1.8/55 is of M42 mount
Cheers
Tom |
It's all good Tom, I certainly wasn't trying to correct you. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
sergun wrote: |
Quote: |
The 55 / 1.6 is a really nice lens, is it the best lens I've got in the 50ish range? I don't know.... |
You have a lot of different 50mm ? Me too, both versions of the 50 and 55mm 1.6 but I don't have many 50mm lenses to assess objectively.
Showed like.
50мм 1.6 ebc
55мм 1.6 ebc
|
Those are both excellent portraits. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 291 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
X-Fujinon 50mm f1.6 DM EBC @f1.6
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Sample of my 55mm/1.8 EBC:
I think the rendering is quite modern. The bokeh looks a bit plasticky especially when the are highlights in it. I think that is a Fuji thing. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|