View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Brian
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 83 Location: Virginia, US
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:06 am Post subject: Test of three fast Nikkors: 55/1.2, 50/1.4 SC, and 50/1.4 AF |
|
|
Brian wrote:
Another test, using a Monochrome Digital camera. Center Crop: 2.5x.
Pixel Resolution is 9microns, image size is 1536x1024, sensor is a KAF-1600. Lenses tested with a Hot Mirror filter to cut Infrared.
Focus point is the side-trim of the super-27 viewfinder, to the right as seen in the image.
Nikkor 55mm F1.2 AI series lens,
At F1.2
At F1.4
At F2
At F4:
Last edited by Brian on Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:52 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 83 Location: Virginia, US
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian wrote:
Nikkor-SC 50mm F1.4 Factory AI Converted,
At F1.4
At F2
At F4:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 83 Location: Virginia, US
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian wrote:
The AF Nikkor did much better on this camera, a N8008s with a DCS200 Digital Back. I'm not sure what happened on the other test. I used manual focus with used focus confirm for this test, and did not let the camera perform AF. Maybe a mechanical backlash?
Another test, using a Monochrome Digital camera. Center Crop: 2.5x.
Pixel Resolution is 9microns, sensor is a KAF-1600. Lenses tested with a Hot Mirror filter to cut Infrared.
At F1.4
At F2
Last edited by Brian on Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 83 Location: Virginia, US
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian wrote:
The images are read from the camera's SCSI Hard Drive in Raw format, and converted to lossless BMP files using my FORTRAN/Assembler program. Photoshop is used to convert to JPEG using Lossless compression. No contrast enhancements used, this is basically the grey-scale coming off of the sensor. This is a 1992 DSLR, and does not use an AA filter, Bayer Filter, or IR cutoff filter. I used the same Hot Mirror filter over the lenses for the test. Crop factor is 2.5x, and the camera was at ~3.5ft. Nikkor primes have always been good wide-open and close-up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spiralcity
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 1207 Location: Chicago, U.S.A
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spiralcity wrote:
The 55 wide open looks very soft in this series of test. Actually it seemed quite soft until f/4. Maybe a bit more crisp that the 50mm-S at f/4. Not much, but maybe it has a slight edge. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian
Joined: 10 May 2008 Posts: 83 Location: Virginia, US
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brian wrote:
Bear in mind that this is a 2.5x crop factor with a sensor that is about 14mm across, and >50LP/mm resolution. My monitor is set to 1600x1200 resolution. Looking at it on a monitor, It's about the equivalent of the center section of a 20"x30" enlargement of a 35mm negative.
I'm surprised that the light-chrome print "Made in USA" on the chrome finish on the Instamatic 150 can be read at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FK
Joined: 07 Jan 2009 Posts: 1 Location: Litchfield, CT
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FK wrote:
This is an interesting series of photos however, it also demonstrates depth of field more than lens sharpness.
Regards,
FK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice to see you here ! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|