| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4087
Location: Switzerland
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 9:50 pm Post subject: TEST 24mm f2.8 (FD, AR, MD, AiS, Sigma, Yash, Zeiss) |
 |
|
stevemark wrote:
For an easier later search I have re-posted the 24mm f2.8 test here, including some new crops from the field (about 10 mm image height).
100% crops from 24 MP Sony A7II FF JPGs, as usual.
100% crops from the corners first:
100% crops from about 10mm image height:
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dejan
Joined: 05 Jan 2021
Posts: 152
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
Sigma is fantastic. Too bad it's hard to find a well-centered copy, allegedly. I've only tried two, both decentered, which is a shame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 895
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Excellent test. Yes Sigma very good lens and an ordeal to find a good copy.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 1274
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
thank you Steve, i was going to get a FD black nose 2.8 but i might have to change my mind; anyway, i am curious how these lenses deal on infinity, which is where they were meant to shoot most of the times |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4087
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Dejan wrote: |
| Sigma is fantastic. Too bad it's hard to find a well-centered copy, allegedly. I've only tried two, both decentered, which is a shame. |
| lumens pixel wrote: |
| Excellent test. Yes Sigma very good lens and an ordeal to find a good copy. |
I've not much experience with Sigma lenses - and I wasn't aware of these problems. The two copies I have (a "Minolta MD MF" plus he Af version with Minolta AF mount) both are surprisingly good.
| kiddo wrote: |
| thank you Steve, i was going to get a FD black nose 2.8 but i might have to change my mind; anyway, i am curious how these lenses deal on infinity, which is where they were meant to shoot most of the times |
These quick test shown above were shot at a distance of 5m. I don't think the results at infinity will differe a lot ... but I can compare the FD 2.8/24mm and the Sigma, at infinity, tomorrow. No time for all ...
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
