View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
diddy
Joined: 28 Mar 2012 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:19 pm Post subject: Tamron SP 28-135mm on Sigma SD1 Merrill |
|
|
diddy wrote:
Hi,
My latest addition to my shrinking manual lens collection: The Tamron SP 28-135mm.
Summary:
- nice color rendition
- reasonably sharp for an old zoom lens
- solid construction
- compact size for such a long zoom
- adaptall-2 mount
- flare handling quite good even without lens hood on
My impression from the first two days of using this lens is that it is quite good for an old zoom. I was mainly interested in the performance at 28mm and here it delivers good performance. There is softness in the corners visible: This effect seems to be more visible with further away objects than close-by ones. I would even say that it fares quite on bar with some of the better 28mm prime lenses I had in the past. The only other zoom lens of similar range I can compare it to is the Sigma AF 28-105mm f2.8-4 non DG version and at 28mm the Sigma lens is worse. The Sigma lens is about 15 years younger, but not of the EX line.
Another good advantage for Sigma SD1 Merrill users is that this lens does not create green corners like many other non recent Sigma lenses (this is because the Foveon sensor works best with telecentric lenses).
Enough said now, here some non creative testing pics:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
drjs
Joined: 25 Feb 2013 Posts: 484 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drjs wrote:
Very nice images! The lens seem to do fairly well under bright sun. Other SP lens tend to have issues with flaring. What are your aperture settings? _________________ Follow me on 500px |
|
Back to top |
|
|
diddy
Joined: 28 Mar 2012 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
diddy wrote:
Some more:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
diddy
Joined: 28 Mar 2012 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
diddy wrote:
Thanks a lot! I think all of them were shot at f8.
Here a pic taken against the sun (note I didn't focus this one properly, I was just interested to test the flare behaviour of this lens):
This is pretty good flare handling for an old lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
That's a lens that slips under the radar I think, it's a great walkabout focal length. I shall be looking for one of these after seeing these excellent pictures. I'm on a bit of a Tamron kick at the moment as well. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
drjs
Joined: 25 Feb 2013 Posts: 484 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
drjs wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
That's a lens that slips under the radar I think, it's a great walkabout focal length. I shall be looking for one of these after seeing these excellent pictures. I'm on a bit of a Tamron kick at the moment as well. |
I am certain that the forum goers here are the single most important reason Tamron lenses are no longer affordable on ebay. _________________ Follow me on 500px |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I sort of know a local photographer that has a huge collection of Tamrons, over 100 lenses I think, and I remember him saying to me a few years ago that if he wanted to sell them it wouldn't be worth the hassle for what he'd get for them. But you're right, they have regained the respect of photographers. At yesterdays camera fair common Tamrons were at the front of the stalls, with high prices on them. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Good results..and I'll always disagree with members who say "old zooms are crap" as I've proved to myself (on a film camera) that I can't see the difference from my favourite zoom bought for £4 to a CZJ Sonnar prime both at 135mm.... ON a computer screen or 8X10 print.
......and have compared a zoom at 28mm with decent consumer 28mm primes and also can't see the difference either (on a computer screen).
...... and even took a test shot of a brick wall comparing a consumer 28mm with a Pentax 24mm-35mm (at 28mm) and if there was distortion I couldn't see the difference.
.......and even taken test shots of my prime 200mm lenses and my favourite zoom at 200mm and the primes do win when the crop is equivalent of a 6ft wide poster.....well would accept the zoom would be beaten long before then
So if anyone is just going to take shots and just post them here at 1000px, they are going to have to use Orio's expensive lenses to beat a very good old zoom at its "sweet spot" to show the difference and it would probably be for more 3d effect (pop). _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
Good results..and I'll always disagree with members who say "old zooms are crap" as I've proved to myself (on a film camera) that I can't see the difference from my favourite zoom bought for £4 to a CZJ Sonnar prime both at 135mm.... ON a computer screen or 8X10 print.
......and have compared a zoom at 28mm with decent consumer 28mm primes and also can't see the difference either (on a computer screen).
...... and even took a test shot of a brick wall comparing a consumer 28mm with a Pentax 24mm-35mm (at 28mm) and if there was distortion I couldn't see the difference.
.......and even taken test shots of my prime 200mm lenses and my favourite zoom at 200mm and the primes do win when the crop is equivalent of a 6ft wide poster.....well would accept the zoom would be beaten long before then
So if anyone is just going to take shots and just post them here at 1000px, they are going to have to use Orio's expensive lenses to beat a very good old zoom at its "sweet spot" to show the difference and it would probably be for more 3d effect (pop). |
Agreed.
Aren't we spoiled for choice these days.
I did buy one of these zooms a couple of weeks ago on spec, and it is on a slow boat from the US at the moment.
After seeing these, I can't wait for it to arrive.
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Excalibur wrote: |
Good results..and I'll always disagree with members who say "old zooms are crap" as I've proved to myself (on a film camera) that I can't see the difference from my favourite zoom bought for £4 to a CZJ Sonnar prime both at 135mm.... ON a computer screen or 8X10 print.
......and have compared a zoom at 28mm with decent consumer 28mm primes and also can't see the difference either (on a computer screen).
...... and even took a test shot of a brick wall comparing a consumer 28mm with a Pentax 24mm-35mm (at 28mm) and if there was distortion I couldn't see the difference.
.......and even taken test shots of my prime 200mm lenses and my favourite zoom at 200mm and the primes do win when the crop is equivalent of a 6ft wide poster.....well would accept the zoom would be beaten long before then
So if anyone is just going to take shots and just post them here at 1000px, they are going to have to use Orio's expensive lenses to beat a very good old zoom at its "sweet spot" to show the difference and it would probably be for more 3d effect (pop). |
Agreed.
Aren't we spoiled for choice these days.
I did buy one of these zooms a couple of weeks ago on spec, and it is on a slow boat from the US at the moment.
After seeing these, I can't wait for it to arrive.
Cheers
OH |
...and it could be argued that the limitations of a digital printer could be an equalizer as well, between a prime and zoom. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ljherrero
Joined: 25 Jun 2014 Posts: 30 Location: Madrid (España)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:08 am Post subject: Tamron SP 28-135 an Sigma SD1 |
|
|
ljherrero wrote:
Hi,
Wear time researching and looking for ways to correct the problem of "green corners" presented at the Sigma SD1 camera to use with old lenses; I posted a listing on https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B84jes-9EdQyeDRFS1k1VnZSYTg/edit?usp=sharing several Adaptall mount lenses and M42 with differing severity-in my experience-mentioned problem of .
Specifically, the Tamron SP 28-135 is one that presents the problem in an atypical way: instead of "green corners" has to "magenta corners" (with green in the middle), and only in the large-angle (28-35) of its focal stroke. I have resorted to limiting the exit pupil 25mm (30mm. Having) and the problem seems to have alleviated almost nothing.
I would like to contrast my experience with someone to try it.
Sorry my bad English (Google translator is to blame )
regards,
Luis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
apologize for being a tad negative here, but am i the only one who finds the sky color distinctively purple-hued and not natural looking? _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|