Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
drjs wrote:
Basilisk wrote: |
drjs wrote: |
I am not familiar with this lens. How is the optical quality? Any difference between the adaptall 2 and AF versions? |
My memory is that my AD2 was not at all bad, nice to have the f2.8. Unfortunately I cannot find the photos I took with it. However the ergonomics, especially the loose one touch zoom and the weight (causing it to hang down and slide to max zoom), made it less than fun to use. I need to give it another try to decide if the image quality justifies its irritations. |
I think a lot of the earlier AF tamrons are just adaptall-2 in an autobody. I have a 90mm Tamron AF model 72E which really just is a reskinned 52BB. The only complain I had was AF was loud and slow. Probably similar with this conversion. I will keep an look on ebay. _________________ Follow me on 500px |