View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice samples! Welcome on our forum! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I had all Jupiter, Tamron , Tair I think Tair-11 is one of the best 135mm under 200 USD _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Relayer wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
I had all Jupiter, Tamron , Tair I think Tair-11 is one of the best 135mm under 200 USD |
some people tell me that Tair11 "white" M39 is better that "black" M42 version. but I can't compare because haven't "white" version. may be in future. |
Better is always relative, different that for sure I have it also in past.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/russian_lens/tair/
You can see both here. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I'm a bit late coming in here, but I prefer the Jupiter images, even if the bokeh isn't quite as good. Colours & sharpness seem much better. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I consider these two as the best M42 135mm tele lenses I have ever tried. You can't go wrong with any of them
Jupiter is sharper at f/3.5 and f/4, but its color rendition isn't constant amongst all samples: Different Jupiters have different coating colors - classic version has purple coating, version with CCCP quality mark has deep violet coating, MC version is purple and green... So different version can have different colors...
Anyway, Jupiter is highly underrated - if we consider price of TAIR, Sonnar, Trioplan (or other lenses which are in demand), Jupiter is much cheaper, but in many ways, it is at least as good... _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
jupiter is definitely better .. IMO
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|