View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:15 am Post subject: Super-Takumar 35mm f2 |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Apertures @f 2 or f2.8
Cheers _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011 Posts: 308 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
Very nice ! Is this the first version with the big front element ?
Eric _________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
erkie wrote: |
Very nice ! Is this the first version with the big front element ?
Eric |
No this is the 2nd version , with the 49mm filter ring but not the SMC. _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Nice, any shots with a bit more distance to the subject? 5-10 feet/2-4Meters
Do you have the 3.5 version too? which do you prefer? Or anyone else have both? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RTI
Joined: 15 Jul 2011 Posts: 282 Location: Moldova, Chisinau
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
RTI wrote:
Very nice, I like your examples, with any lenses, you've got a great taste _________________ Cameras: Canon 5DIII, Zorki-4, Canon AE-1
MF:Rokkor 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 58/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.7, M39 Jupiter-9 (silver 1955), Zuiko 35-70/3.6
AF: Sigma Art 35/1.4, Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dfujevec
Joined: 27 Nov 2009 Posts: 43 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
dfujevec wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Nice, any shots with a bit more distance to the subject? 5-10 feet/2-4Meters
Do you have the 3.5 version too? which do you prefer? Or anyone else have both? |
I have both versions (35/2 and 35/3.5) and on FF camera little f3,5 is great lens. It works a lot better than Tak 35/2. Takumar 35/2 (I have Super Tak 35/2 with 49mm filter) has a lot more CA and softer borders at any settings. I could be that my copy is not great, but I am not satisfied with that lens. On crop camera (pentax K20d) the difference is not that big and two lenses are equal with speed advantage of 35/2.
Photo with S-M-C Takumar 35 f3,5 wide open on Eos5dmkII
_________________ Pentax K20D + eos 5DmkII + 15kg of Takumar lenses
http://dfujevec.deviantart.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
[quote="dfujevec"]
Lightshow wrote: |
Nice, any shots with a bit more distance to the subject? 5-10 feet/2-4Meters
Photo with S-M-C Takumar 35 f3,5 wide open on Eos5dmkII
|
Holy mother of beautiful pictures, 3D, bokeh and awesomeness...
That's one of the best photographs I've ever seen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Hmm, that picture is great, an S-M-C might do the trick.
My 35/3.5 would turn that image into a flat lifeless snapshot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I like the picture with the key-locks, but I do not like the bokeh in the first examples, I'm afraid. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
***Photo with S-M-C Takumar 35 f3,5 wide open on Eos5dmkII***
HUH! that is too good to be true...my monitor must be tuned to Tak shots _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dfujevec
Joined: 27 Nov 2009 Posts: 43 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dfujevec wrote:
Thanks for comments!
I use S-M-C Tak 35/3,5 for street photos and usualy wide open. Wide open is already sharp enough for street shots. At f5,6 is very sharp from corner to corner (FF corners). If I need more speed I use Tokina 35/2 which is very good at f2-2,8. So my Takumar 35/2 is waiting for better times. _________________ Pentax K20D + eos 5DmkII + 15kg of Takumar lenses
http://dfujevec.deviantart.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Excellent samples guys! Lockers are especially good! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
Thanks RTI
LucisPictor wrote: |
I like the picture with the key-locks, but I do not like the bokeh in the first examples, I'm afraid. |
The locks are superlative. I can understand you not liking the bokeh- its a personal taste thing -its not my favorite bokeh either.
Attila wrote: |
Excellent samples guys! Lockers are especially good! |
The locks are amazing "dfujevec" , crisp ,lovely colors- whats the story on the locks?
Lightshow wrote: |
Nice, any shots with a bit more distance to the subject? 5-10 feet/2-4Meters
Do you have the 3.5 version too? which do you prefer? Or anyone else have both? |
Heres some in that range -taken wide open -fresh from the factory .
Yes I have the SMC 3.5 version-which is excellent as you can tell from "dfujevec"'s example
Here are some from my SMC Takumar 3.5/35 taken last year; I find the lens very sharp even wide open and very nice for landscapes.
Cheers _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I have the S-M-C version, but I'm not sure if I like it yet! Coupled with my K100D the images were, well, soft and not very inspiring. Perhaps it was the small viewfinder and I was having an off day...must try it on the 5D
Actually, I quite like the gloves picture _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
I have the S-M-C version, but I'm not sure if I like it yet! Coupled with my K100D the images were, well, soft and not very inspiring. Perhaps it was the small viewfinder and I was having an off day...must try it on the 5D
Actually, I quite like the gloves picture |
I think #2 and #3 are quite nice. _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dfujevec
Joined: 27 Nov 2009 Posts: 43 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dfujevec wrote:
Kathmandu wrote: |
The locks are amazing "dfujevec" , crisp ,lovely colors- whats the story on the locks?
|
The story is that couples want to lock their love forever.
I must admit that Super Takumar 35/2 was one of disappointments when I put him on FF camera. On other hand Takumar 35/3,5 was a suprise. On Pentax K20d that difference was not so evident. _________________ Pentax K20D + eos 5DmkII + 15kg of Takumar lenses
http://dfujevec.deviantart.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Super Tak 35mm f3.5 is a very good lens as well
_________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
dfujevec wrote: |
I have both versions (35/2 and 35/3.5) and on FF camera little f3,5 is great lens. It works a lot better than Tak 35/2...
|
great picture!
I use on Pentax APS-C and the 2/35 ( S-M-C ) doesn't impress me, tough it's ok. It has the obvious speed and shallow dof advantage, but it hasn't the wow factor of the little f3.5 ( Super Tak )
have not used them much both, not use 35mm lenses much, and an Auto Tak f3.5 has stolen the attention, sharp as hell as well and with these weird, stunning colors _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
Last edited by kuuan on Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I really must start using my Super Tak 3.5/35. I think it's been in my collection for over a year now and has never been put to a camera. Sacrilege, I know.
There is a post on the Pentax Forums discussing the difference between the single/early transitional multi-coatings and the true S-M-C lenses: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/48870-super-takumar-vs-super-multi-coated-takumar-coatings.html
To summarize very quickly, the Takumar 3.5/35mm is one of the best in term of flare resistance. And the S-M-C makes only a minor, 0.11% difference, in this regard (from 0.73% to 0.62%).
Looks to be a very solid performer! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
dfujevec wrote: |
Kathmandu wrote: |
The locks are amazing "dfujevec" , crisp ,lovely colors- whats the story on the locks?
|
The story is that couples want to lock their love forever.
I must admit that Super Takumar 35/2 was one of disappointments when I put him on FF camera. On other hand Takumar 35/3,5 was a suprise. On Pentax K20d that difference was not so evident. |
Wow quite a nice story -a pilgrimage every lover ought to take. _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Excuse me, could you guys start saying some nice things about the S-M-C 2/35? I will be selling mine soon, and my SuperTak 3.5/35, and you're ruining my pitch!
Love the locks picture and the story. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Excuse me, could you guys start saying some nice things about the S-M-C 2/35? I will be selling mine soon, and my SuperTak 3.5/35, and you're ruining my pitch!
Love the locks picture and the story. |
the S-M-C f2/35mm is a good lens
and I mean it! _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I have the pentax K35/2, newer, one of the best.
35mm in crop sensor at f2 can produce full figure portraits with blurred background.
28 too, but i have to stay closer to subject.
Nice pics you have. _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
the S-M-C f2/35mm is a good lens
|
on APS-C sensor Pentax *istDs
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
won't compete with a good 50 on FF, it's a 35mm, and can't do anything about faulty focusing and high ISO noise _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
I like #2- very much. Looks like an excellent lens the SMC. _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|