Some pictures from my Carl Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 C/Y

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

Memberlist

Profile

Some pictures from my Carl Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 C/Y

Home Manual Focus Lenses

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

kenji

Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Russia

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:28 am Post subject: Some pictures from my Carl Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 C/Y

kenji wrote: Hi guys! I want to share some photos with my lovely model Marianna. Hope you will enjoy photos and lens (Carl Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 C/Y) bokeh. _________________ Schneider Kreuznach Xenoplan 17 mm f/ 1.7, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar 60 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in Japan, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in W.Germany, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Jupiter-37A 135 mm f/ 3.5, Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Industar-50-2 50 mm f/ 3.5, Mir-24 35 mm f/ 2, Industar-61 L/Z 50 mm f/ 2.8, Helios-81 50 mm f/ 2, Zenitar-M 50 mm f/ 1.7, Helios-44M 58 mm f/ 2, Helios 44-2 58 mm f/ 2, Jupiter-9 85 mm f/ 2.0, MC Kaleinar-5N 100 mm f/ 2.8, Jupiter-11 135 mm f/ 4

Attila

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary

Supporting Member

Expire: 2025-11-18

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:43 am Post subject:

Attila wrote: Nice shoots , pretty lady what else we need ? Keep coming I love them all! _________________ ------------------------------- Items on sale on Ebay Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8

iangreenhalgh1

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679

Supporting Member

Expire: 2014-01-07

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:44 am Post subject:

iangreenhalgh1 wrote: Nice shots. Doesn't look much different from other good 85mm like J-9 to me. With this sort of subject and distance from background, any good lens will show good bokeh at large apertures. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it!

Katastrofo

Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA

Supporting Member

Expire: 2013-11-19

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:05 am Post subject:

Katastrofo wrote: Beautiful captures (and model!) congrats!

kenji

Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Russia

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:50 am Post subject:

kenji wrote:

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:

Nice shots. Doesn't look much different from other good 85mm like J-9 to me.

With this sort of subject and distance from background, any good lens will show good bokeh at large apertures.

I agree with you. I posted only these shots cause others with more impressive bokeh vere not good (model's pose or model's face expression). But you can recognize it on the first photo. Ii differs from Jupiter-9 (which i like too)

But i thought you will like nice model and lens was not bad (no busy bokeh, no contrast decresase, no flare or smth). Just some girl's shots Smile

Btw Ian i sold all my Jupiter-9 cause they are soft at wide-open. Bokeh was good and it was real Sonnar (!) but this softness and contrast decrease.. I cant accept it.

See my test pic

_________________
Schneider Kreuznach Xenoplan 17 mm f/ 1.7, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar 60 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in Japan, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in W.Germany, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Jupiter-37A 135 mm f/ 3.5, Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Industar-50-2 50 mm f/ 3.5, Mir-24 35 mm f/ 2, Industar-61 L/Z 50 mm f/ 2.8, Helios-81 50 mm f/ 2, Zenitar-M 50 mm f/ 1.7, Helios-44M 58 mm f/ 2, Helios 44-2 58 mm f/ 2, Jupiter-9 85 mm f/ 2.0, MC Kaleinar-5N 100 mm f/ 2.8, Jupiter-11 135 mm f/ 4

kenji

Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Russia

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:53 am Post subject:

kenji wrote:

Attila wrote:

Nice shoots , pretty lady what else we need ? Smile

Keep coming I love them all!

Hehe. Ok, I'll hunt girl models in near future Smile

heartcat

Level 2

Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Posts: 371

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:40 am Post subject:

heartcat wrote: Nice portraits of an attractive young woman. _________________ Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42

ManualFocus-G

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom

Supporting Member

Expire: 2014-11-24

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:52 am Post subject:

ManualFocus-G wrote: Very nice The Planar is in a completely different league to the J9, and so it should be given the age gap! The obvious difference is contrast, even when compared to my excellent alu copy. _________________ Graham - Moderator Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g

poilu

Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece

Supporting Member

Expire: 2019-08-29

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:07 pm Post subject:

poilu wrote:

heartcat wrote:

Nice portraits of an attractive young woman.

+1 !
_________________
T*

RTI

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 282
Location: Moldova, Chisinau

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:12 pm Post subject:

RTI wrote:

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:

Nice shots. Doesn't look much different from other good 85mm like J-9 to me.

With this sort of subject and distance from background, any good lens will show good bokeh at large apertures.

To me they look totally different, and I'm not talking about contrast and sharpness. Unless you have some kind of magic Planar type jupiter-9.
_________________
Cameras: Canon 5DIII, Zorki-4, Canon AE-1
MF:Rokkor 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 58/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.7, M39 Jupiter-9 (silver 1955), Zuiko 35-70/3.6
AF: Sigma Art 35/1.4, Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC,

kenji

Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Russia

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:44 pm Post subject:

kenji wrote:

ManualFocus-G wrote:

Very nice

The Planar is in a completely different league to the J9, and so it should be given the age gap! The obvious difference is contrast, even when compared to my excellent alu copy.

I still think what is better for a non-commercial work. Sharp and constast lens with visible CA or soft non-contrast lens w/o CA.. Difficult choice.

So J9 is not that bad.
_________________
Schneider Kreuznach Xenoplan 17 mm f/ 1.7, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar 60 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in Japan, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in W.Germany, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Jupiter-37A 135 mm f/ 3.5, Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Industar-50-2 50 mm f/ 3.5, Mir-24 35 mm f/ 2, Industar-61 L/Z 50 mm f/ 2.8, Helios-81 50 mm f/ 2, Zenitar-M 50 mm f/ 1.7, Helios-44M 58 mm f/ 2, Helios 44-2 58 mm f/ 2, Jupiter-9 85 mm f/ 2.0, MC Kaleinar-5N 100 mm f/ 2.8, Jupiter-11 135 mm f/ 4

ManualFocus-G

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom

Supporting Member

Expire: 2014-11-24

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:48 pm Post subject:

ManualFocus-G wrote:

kenji wrote:

ManualFocus-G wrote:

Very nice

The Planar is in a completely different league to the J9, and so it should be given the age gap! The obvious difference is contrast, even when compared to my excellent alu copy.

I still think what is better for a non-commercial work. Sharp and constast lens with visible CA or soft non-contrast lens w/o CA.. Difficult choice.

So J9 is not that bad.

J9 is not bad at all, but to me I prefer the images from the Planar. I haven't noticed CA issues with this lens.
_________________
Graham - Moderator

Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses

See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g

kenji

Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Location: Russia

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:55 pm Post subject:

kenji wrote:

ManualFocus-G wrote:

kenji wrote:

ManualFocus-G wrote:

Very nice

The Planar is in a completely different league to the J9, and so it should be given the age gap! The obvious difference is contrast, even when compared to my excellent alu copy.

I still think what is better for a non-commercial work. Sharp and constast lens with visible CA or soft non-contrast lens w/o CA.. Difficult choice.

So J9 is not that bad.

J9 is not bad at all, but to me I prefer the images from the Planar. I haven't noticed CA issues with this lens.

CA is a problem sometimes with the Planar at F1.4. If you look carefully at my shot you'll see purple fringes when white meets dark. Please note that this crop is close to the center of an image. More fringes appear at the edges.

But this situation is not a common one. Just for test i made a photo of the building with lots of metal cornices (that reflecting thing at the bottom of every window) at wide-open. I know this issue so if i want a to have a no-CA shot i can close down aperture, use CPL filter and so on.
_________________
Schneider Kreuznach Xenoplan 17 mm f/ 1.7, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar 60 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in Japan, Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 mm f/ 1.4 C/Y made in W.Germany, Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Jupiter-37A 135 mm f/ 3.5, Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135 mm f/ 2.8 C/Y, Industar-50-2 50 mm f/ 3.5, Mir-24 35 mm f/ 2, Industar-61 L/Z 50 mm f/ 2.8, Helios-81 50 mm f/ 2, Zenitar-M 50 mm f/ 1.7, Helios-44M 58 mm f/ 2, Helios 44-2 58 mm f/ 2, Jupiter-9 85 mm f/ 2.0, MC Kaleinar-5N 100 mm f/ 2.8, Jupiter-11 135 mm f/ 4

ManualFocus-G

Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom

Supporting Member

Expire: 2014-11-24

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:06 pm Post subject:

ManualFocus-G wrote: Absolutely, but I use this lens as a portrait lens and therefore don't see the CA issue _________________ Graham - Moderator Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g

SonicScot

Joined: 01 Dec 2011
Posts: 2697
Location: Scottish Highlands

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:13 am Post subject:

SonicScot wrote: I'll just cut to the chase here, do you have her phone number? Please... _________________ Gary Currently active gear.... Sony a7 E-M1 Mkll Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender Tamron 500/8 55BB Sigma 100-300/4 Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5 Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2 Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2 Jupiter-9 85/2 Helios.... 58/2 44-3 Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/

pich900

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1745
Location: The Netherlands/Zwolle

Supporting Member

Expire: 2012-12-27

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:28 pm Post subject:

pich900 wrote:

SonicScot wrote:

I'll just cut to the chase here, do you have her phone number?

Please... Twisted Evil

Gary, can you speak the Russian language Laughing

?

Beautiful portraits, I love it Very Happy

(and I don't talk about the model of course Rolling Eyes

)
_________________
All my lenses are for sale, nikkor, Angenieux, Zeiss etc.....
Regards,
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700

Last edited by pich900 on Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:22 pm; edited 1 time in total

SonicScot

Joined: 01 Dec 2011
Posts: 2697
Location: Scottish Highlands

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject:

SonicScot wrote:

pich900 wrote:

SonicScot wrote:

I'll just cut to the chase here, do you have her phone number?

Please... Twisted Evil

Gary, can you speak the Russian language Laughing

?

Beatiful portraits, I love it Very Happy

(and I don't talk about the model of course Rolling Eyes

)

I'm willing to learn Razz

_________________
Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll

Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base

Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/

Display posts from previous:

Home Manual Focus Lenses

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum