View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4087 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 12:46 pm Post subject: Sigma Mirror Ultra-Telephoto F8 500mm (pre-XQ) |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Sigma (Porst Color) Mirror Ultra-Telephoto F8 500mm:
The lens - show here side-by-side with the Nikkor 8/500mm (II) mirror lens - is huge and heavy (about 1550 g). It is a clone of the corresponding Sigma lens, manufactured for the German retailer Porst. Since it has a T2 (42x0.75mm) instead of the common M42 (42x1mm) thread, I haven't been able to test it yet, and not much information is available online. The lens probably is from the 1960s. Its focus throw is rather "shallow" (270° from infinity to 3m MFD), and its performance might be quite OK given its size.
Anyone has more information, or even has used it before?
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1216 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
No experience with that one at all.
Sigma's have been a challenge for me personally.
I can't seem to find any Sigma with clear, un-fungussed glass.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4087 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
No experience with that one at all.
Sigma's have been a challenge for me personally.
|
Agreed - most of their MF lenses I know are not that interesting, to put it mildly. There are some exceptions though, e. g. the Sigma 2.8/24mm "Superwide II" which is a really good vintage 24mm lens. Equally interesting is the Sigma "gamma II" 3.5-4.2/21-35mm superwide which is comparable (but not identical) to the Canon 3.5/20-35mm L.
Many other MF lenses with excellent detail resolution such as the 3.5.4.5/50-200mm APO or the 5.6/400mm APO (or several versions of the 3.5/14mm) have inherent problems with hazing, caused by disintegrating glue used for cementing some doublets. Really a pity!!
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 662 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
I have a copy of the same lens badged as Lentar. I've never seen a Sigma badged version personally, and my copy doesn't give any clues that it is made by Sigma. However, when badged as a Prinz lens, it has the distinctive Σ serial number prefix that was only used by Sigma. The also distinctive 40m, 130f longest focus marking before infinity of these copies also shows that the following version with the adjustable aperture stop mechanism which was very widely sold under a massive variety of badges was also a Sigma made lens, although, just as for the earlier version, I haven't located one marked with a Sigma badge, or even an Σ serial preset copy. From that it also appears that the 750mm F/11 lens often sold as a Hanimex badge with the adjustable aperture is also Sigma made. I am also of the opinion that the 250mm F/5.6 lens seen as a Lentar or Hanimex badge is also Sigma, although just due to the similarity of the lens appearance in this case.
My copy of the lens you have, has reasonable IQ, especially compared to a normal third party 500mm F/8 lens from the lates 60s to mid 80s. I don't know how it compares to one from a camera manufacturer as I haven't used any. My best mirror lens is an MTO 500mm, which is slightly better, but the Sigma lens does not disgrace itself.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4087 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
I have a copy of the same lens badged as Lentar. I've never seen a Sigma badged version personally, and my copy doesn't give any clues that it is made by Sigma. However, when badged as a Prinz lens, it has the distinctive Σ serial number prefix that was only used by Sigma. The also distinctive 40m, 130f longest focus marking before infinity of these copies also shows that the following version with the adjustable aperture stop mechanism which was very widely sold under a massive variety of badges was also a Sigma made lens, although, just as for the earlier version, I haven't located one marked with a Sigma badge, or even an Σ serial preset copy. From that it also appears that the 750mm F/11 lens often sold as a Hanimex badge with the adjustable aperture is also Sigma made. I am also of the opinion that the 250mm F/5.6 lens seen as a Lentar or Hanimex badge is also Sigma, although just due to the similarity of the lens appearance in this case.
My copy of the lens you have, has reasonable IQ, especially compared to a normal third party 500mm F/8 lens from the lates 60s to mid 80s. I don't know how it compares to one from a camera manufacturer as I haven't used any. My best mirror lens is an MTO 500mm, which is slightly better, but the Sigma lens does not disgrace itself.
|
@ Alun:
Thank you for your reply and the additional information! In fact my lens does have the distincive Σ serial (Σ-68103, that is), the distinctive 40m, 130f longest focus marking, and it and looks exactly as the Sigma branded ones shown in the internet So if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and waddles like a duck, it probably is a duck
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|