Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Seeking Mirror Lens for Macro Work- Crazy?!
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
danfromm wrote:
Mark, why do you want a long macro lens? Subjects you can't get close to? Just because?.


Danny Boy, I am an artist. We experiment. That's how we discover paths untread by science. Laughing
I am not just looking for a long macro lens, I'm curious about the shortest mirror lens I can get for macro as I like the rendering in some of these pix (you have to scroll down to see the donut highlight images).

The very last one is a good example of why I am seeking to perhaps use a mirror lens for macro.

danfromm wrote:
I ask because my three short little MicroNikkors (55/2.8, 105/2.8, 200/4, all AIS) have been all that I needed in most situations.

I have two of the three (not the 200mm) and they are very good. I replaced my 55/2.8 with a 60/2.8 Zeiss Makro-Planar which I like better.




Indeed why not, I totally agree, keep on pushing Kram Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't use a mirror lens regularly for close up/macro work as details are fuzzy, but if you don't examine the output too closely, it can be pleasing.

Here are some of my experiments: not macro, but close up Smile:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/4825775048


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/4825774988


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/4825166059


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/5647943656


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/5647943682


http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/5647943718


PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmm?....is there a possibility of using a close-up filter in front
of the mirror lense ? Nikon and Canon have some good
altho expensive ones . These filters just may add to the
" artistic endeaver " with the optical contributions.
Looking forward to see some more examples on this thread.

thanks


PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gmonkman1 wrote:
hmmm?....is there a possibility of using a close-up filter in front
of the mirror lense ? Nikon and Canon have some good
altho expensive ones . These filters just may add to the
" artistic endeaver " with the optical contributions.
Looking forward to see some more examples on this thread.

thanks

I think it's possible but the front of the SP 500 F8 is 82mm. I have the Canon's close-up lens 500D in 77mm wich is already quite huge.

I've added samples using tubes here : http://forum.mflenses.com/tamron-sp-500-f8-and-tubes-and-doubler-comparison-t50363.html


PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My contribution

http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1238061.html#1238061


PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
A little tasteful doughnut shaped bokeh is my main reason.


Another lens that may suit your style (but maybe not your camera) is an Ernitec 75mm f/1.3 c-mount lens, or another of its variants. Mine at least had an internal filter that allowed the aperture to close completely. When stopped down, it produced doughnut shaped bokeh. Whether it is tasteful or not is in the eye of the beholder.
At f/1.3

At f/2.8

At f/5.6


You could also try using your favourite lens and adding a bokeh shaping circle insert.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's raining today and the water drops on the needles made me think of bright highlights and donuts in plant shots.

Here's my 3M-5A 500/8 russian mirror lens. All tripod mounted, in the doorway of my deck to keep my gear dry.

Please forgive lack of sharpness, the breeze shaking the branches and I too far away to hold them still. Consider these as rough sketches or equipment tests Razz

1) About 3m away. MFD of the lens is about 2m.


2) About 7m away, this branch was quite shaky Sad I was trying to focus on the spray of needles at center with water drops on them.


3) as #2, front focused by approx. 50cm


4) as #2, back focused by approx. 50cm


PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dick, I like it! It's my understanding that C mount lenses will not work on Canon DSLR's (60D). Is that right?

fuzzy, I like the last one. Focus is of no imortance in the abstract realm!
Laughing

In another thread, on this shockingly popular subject, someone suggested glueing a coin in the middle of a filter! Brilliant methinks! I plan on trying that next week.
Twisted Evil


PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
Dick, I like it! It's my understanding that C mount lenses will not work on Canon DSLR's (60D). Is that right?


Anything that projects an image works on any camera to some extent, but indeed, for normal photography c mount and Canon Dslrs don't work. There is a c mount toEF or m42 mount adapter, but that will act as an extension tube, since the c mount register is much shorter than Canon EF. Than again, if you're after macro that limitation may be an advantage.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just gave it a try with my Reflex-Nikkor 500/8 and the shortest extension ring I have (5mm)
I dialed 500mm as focal length in the OM-D for stabilisation (IBIS) and upped the ISO to 3200 for short exposures

This came out





I'm not unhappy with this result, and may use it more, even with longer extension rings ...

C U
Rafael


PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like #1 alot.
Also I found the tamron500/8 has razor thin DOF, relatively difficult to set correct focus. How about your nikkor 500/8?


PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I shot that photo from a distance of ca 4m and the sharp portion of the photo is only 2-3cm wide.
Not exactly large DOF Smile)
But, it's doable to focus, and even use the focusing aid (magnification x10) thanks to the fabulous IBIS of the OM-D

C U,
Rafael


PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's where I'm at now on this idea: I'm going to take the advice of someone who suggested a filter with a coing or black disc glued to the center.
It's the donuts I'm after!


PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Mark.
Some donuts landscape with Tamron SP 500 F8, made on purpose ! Very Happy
It has some kind of impressionists' painting... like "pointillisme"
It could be a good basis for pp art





and a without donut for pleasure :


Cheers,


Last edited by Olivier on Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:28 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Handheld, a long time ago
...with a E-510 (!)
Laughing
#1

(edit : Tamron 500/8 )


PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still the Reflex-Nikkor but with 65mm of extension rings on OM-D
Handheld @ 3200iso



C U,
Rafael


PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awesome. It looks like painting.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Olivier, I like your "pointillisme"!


PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
Olivier, I like your "pointillisme"!

I felt you would, Mark ! Very Happy
This is obtained by beeing slightly out of focus, so that the donuts size can be more or less small.
and I think these images can be post processed to be more artistic.

Snapseed treatment




PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

f6cvalkyrie wrote:
Still the Reflex-Nikkor but with 65mm of extension rings on OM-D
Handheld @ 3200iso
C U,
Rafael

Do you feel that the stabilization is better with the OM-D ?


PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phenix jc wrote:

Do you feel that the stabilization is better with the OM-D ?


The OM-D is the only camera I own that can shoot stabilized with manual focus lenses.
It certainly does a great job of that !

C U
Rafael


PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Thanks Mark. Not really a bad idea. Are you looking for:
- long working distance
- high magnification
- doughnut shaped bokeh
- rel. lightweight
or why do you require a mirror lens?

Another one...



DOF is razor thin



but the doughnuts are cute



I love this photos of yours Klaus, and i wondering what kind of lens you have used?

Do you know were i can get a mirror lens for my Canon 5D mark II? I live in Sweden and there is no place here were i can buy a mirror lens, really bad, guess they don't like them?!

I really would love to shot macros with a mirror lens, but i have no idea wich one to use, any one here with an idea?


PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Tammy.

This is the Tamron SP 500mm F8. I have the 55B model and it renders very well on the 5D MkII.

Here are some on ebay :
http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=tamron+sp+500+f8&_in_kw=1&_ex_kw=&_sacat=0&_okw=&_oexkw=&_adv=1&_udlo=&_udhi=&_ftrt=901&_ftrv=1&_sabdlo=&_sabdhi=&_samilow=&_samihi=&_sadis=200&_fpos=&LH_SubLocation=1&_fsradio2=%26LH_PrefLoc%3D1&_sargn=-1%26saslc%3D2&_salic=3&_saact=3&LH_SALE_CURRENCY=0&_sop=12&_dmd=1&_ipg=50

The 55B. This one is the same package I got.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Tamron-SP-500mm-f8-telephoto-mirror-lens-55B-Adaptall-2-case-lens-hood-/180823645984?pt=UK_Lenses_Filters_Lenses&hash=item2a19eddf20

55B is the oldest and has the advantage to have a detachable tripod mount and a built-in hood.
Optical design differences between 55B and 55BB are small.
55B : http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/55B.html
55BB : http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/55BB.html
I prefer 55B for its hood and its tripod mount (I believe the 55BB has no way to mount it on a tripod).

Next : how to mount it on the 5D MkII ?
Tis lens is a Tamron adaptall-2 lens. This is a special mount system which allows to mount them on any brand with the correct ad2 adapter. The more simple is to get a brand new one adapter with AF confirm chip. I have Big-IS ones which are very good :
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/AF-confirm-Tamron-Adaptall-2-Lens-Canon-adapter-/120587648568?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1c13957e38


PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Olivier wrote:
Hello Tammy.

This is the Tamron SP 500mm F8. I have the 55B model and it renders very well on the 5D MkII.

Here are some on ebay :
http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=tamron+sp+500+f8&_in_kw=1&_ex_kw=&_sacat=0&_okw=&_oexkw=&_adv=1&_udlo=&_udhi=&_ftrt=901&_ftrv=1&_sabdlo=&_sabdhi=&_samilow=&_samihi=&_sadis=200&_fpos=&LH_SubLocation=1&_fsradio2=%26LH_PrefLoc%3D1&_sargn=-1%26saslc%3D2&_salic=3&_saact=3&LH_SALE_CURRENCY=0&_sop=12&_dmd=1&_ipg=50

The 55B. This one is the same package I got.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Tamron-SP-500mm-f8-telephoto-mirror-lens-55B-Adaptall-2-case-lens-hood-/180823645984?pt=UK_Lenses_Filters_Lenses&hash=item2a19eddf20

55B is the oldest and has the advantage to have a detachable tripod mount and a built-in hood.
Optical design differences between 55B and 55BB are small.
55B : http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/55B.html
55BB : http://www.adaptall-2.org/lenses/55BB.html
I prefer 55B for its hood and its tripod mount (I believe the 55BB has no way to mount it on a tripod).

Next : how to mount it on the 5D MkII ?
Tis lens is a Tamron adaptall-2 lens. This is a special mount system which allows to mount them on any brand with the correct ad2 adapter. The more simple is to get a brand new one adapter with AF confirm chip. I have Big-IS ones which are very good :
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/AF-confirm-Tamron-Adaptall-2-Lens-Canon-adapter-/120587648568?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1c13957e38


------------------
Thanks a lot for all your tips!! So, this are the one to get those beautiful backgrounds?

You know, i have photographed a lot of macro, i have a website and a blog, if your interested, but in my case now - i'm looking for more artistic lenses. I try to do it with both my canon lens and sometimes my tamronlens, but i really have fall in love with those backgrounds.

Thanks a lot!


PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
danfromm wrote:
Mark, why do you want a long macro lens? Subjects you can't get close to? Just because?.


Danny Boy, I am an artist. We experiment. That's how we discover paths untread by science. Laughing
I am not just looking for a long macro lens, I'm curious about the shortest mirror lens I can get for macro as I like the rendering in some of these pix (you have to scroll down to see the donut highlight images).

The very last one is a good example of why I am seeking to perhaps use a mirror lens for macro.

danfromm wrote:
I ask because my three short little MicroNikkors (55/2.8, 105/2.8, 200/4, all AIS) have been all that I needed in most situations.

I have two of the three (not the 200mm) and they are very good. I replaced my 55/2.8 with a 60/2.8 Zeiss Makro-Planar which I like better.

____________________


Hi Kram!

I'm new on this forum and don't really know how it works here Smile

But when i read what you are writing, i just feel the same way as you do - i'm also looing for the artistic feeling, and i have tried to create with both my canonlens and my tamron lens before, but haven't really got that feeling i'm looking for. But i will go on, trying.

I read what you wrote about the coin, do you know what i tried once? Smile I tried a bit of plastic thing in front of my lense on my canonlense, a 100 -2,8, and the result was this Unfortunatley the plastic thing wasn't a perfect circle, and know i'm looing for a lens that can give me what i'm looking for. A really love those image here from Klaus, the background was lovely, i love the dof.

Best regards

Tammy