View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11012 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:53 pm Post subject: S-M-C Takumar 1:3.5/135 M42 5Dc -- Foggy Morning |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome all comments, criticisms, suggestions, tips, tricks , etc..
@f/8, 5Dc iso160, develop in DPP using AWB, 'Neutral' Picture Style, +3 Sharpness, +3 Unsharp Mask, +2 Color Saturation, Convert to jpg, resize jpg quality 80/100 using Irfanview.
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Number one my fave. Very atmospheric (no pun). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I like #1 too, very nice. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I like both with a minimal detail, in my taste. The clear upper part is something distracting about the very nice atmosphere of the pic. Only a detail, no more. And in my taste.
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 825 Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Powerful images! My favorite is the top image - I really like the color and tone. Was this the color as you remember it, or is it more an artifact of white balance setting, filtering, or postprocessing? _________________ Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chayelle
Joined: 04 Aug 2011 Posts: 55 Location: Arkansas
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chayelle wrote:
# 1 is indeed quite nice. I like it better as the taller trees
give me more perspective, I think... _________________ Cheryle
He is...
><> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kathmandu
Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 1479 Location: (Kathmandu,Nepal. Currently)Pacific Northwest, USA
Expire: 2012-04-08
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kathmandu wrote:
me likes ? _________________ kathmandu
Sony α 700 DSLR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I prefer the 2nd. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I'm partial to the second one, too, with the caveat that it feels a bit "cut-off." Were it possible to re-frame it, including the trees a bit lower or all the way to the ground might change the "cut-offness" a bit. However, I think that the simpler color scheme and fact that there's a bit less for the eyes to try and decipher improves its overall viewability.
On the latter part, one of the reasons driving in fog is exhausting it because the eyes have to constantly work to focus on what is or isn't there. That's part of why, I think, fog lends itself to visual trickery. With the first picture, some of that visual disruption exists in the trees lightly shrouded by fog. It works well and captures it nicely, but I can feel my brain struggling to ascertain what is really part of the tree and what is just fog-trickery.
Overall both are very nice and well done as fog is fairly difficult to photograph well, IMO. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7790 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
For some people the first one might have a bit too much sky to be fashionable, but who cares? It's a superb image and the sky is what it's all about.
Both images are very good, I wish I could get images like that from my Tak'. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
what I love about these images is how you let the fog be the orange-yellow color, it makes both images so powerfully protean, and implies the sun in all the fog. Strong photographs. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
What really grabs me about number one is the "ghost" tree on the left, with the burnt out dead one in the foreground clothed in the ghostly foliage of the one behind it. Very powerful for me too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Number one. Very good composition here. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
The fog effect was captured well, but the composition could be better. Obviously you took this from a high elevation, and while that was to certain advantage, it may have made the composition more difficult. I would prefer to see the bottom of the trees for a more complete image. While the fog covered tree tops are a beautiful image, I liken the composition to chopping off someone's legs. Perhaps a wider lens? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Lovely shots but I have this problem about verticals (and horizontals) and all the trees in #1 seem to be leaning to the right. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11012 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Wow thanks!
Trees grow to the top of the ridges here, panoramic views like this are at rare breaks in the trees or through the branches, or, like here at the top of a landslide shaped just like a crescent flake a flint knapper makes, there is a logging road 3 meters away, the pressure & pounding of the trucks popped loose a flake from the ridge edge, it slid down the hill.
From the edge here, 25 meters of dead drop through the air onto steepness extending another .5km(!). The other side of landslide can also be seen:
From this perch, toward the Northeast the view is restricted, framed by tree branches, just out of the frame in the original two photos.
The view to the North is more opened... (S-M-C 20mm F/4.5) On the left is ocean fog, to the right is colder river fog from higher elevations. See the different colors?:
As the ocean fog blows inland up the river, it overflows the 'banks' in places:
Here the two fogs mix in the river valley:
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11012 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
that last looks much better more dramatic I think with PP. Here dcraw is used to make visual most detail from raw, and to recover the blown highlights:
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|