MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Rexatar and Rexagon lenses (in Prinz brochure)
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

Circa mid 1970s?

The branding here is curious. In the 1960s, American Camera and Photo Supply Co. began selling photo products under the Prinz brand name. Subsequently, it appears some Prinz lenses were sub-branded as Rexatar and Rexagon.

My own Rexagon 135mm lens was made in Japan and I would assume all the lenses listed here were made in Japan as well. But I have no information about the manufacturer.


#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


Reply

Very nice to know this exists- I had been looking for brochures like this, which have diagrams, but all mostly in America hidden behind expensive shipping...

Thanks for the upload.


Reply

What is the significance of the shaded lens elements in the diagrams?


Reply

eggplant wrote:
Very nice to know this exists- I had been looking for brochures like this, which have diagrams, but all mostly in America hidden behind expensive shipping...

Thanks for the upload.

You're welcome.
Yes, I really enjoy finding brochures for third party lenses. And this one was a pleasant surprise:
Full specs and it's even printed on nice, textured paper.


RokkorDoctor wrote:
What is the significance of the shaded lens elements in the diagrams?

That's a good question. At first glance, it would appear that cemented groups are shaded. But that doesn't seem to apply in all cases.
Maybe there are mistakes? Or maybe the shading is just marketing razzle dazzle? Wink

I can confirm my copy of the Rexagon 100mm does have a cemented triplet. Alas, that triplet also has some separation.
And I know the Rexagon 135mm which came along with the brochure also has cemented elements... because it too has separation!

The brochure is better made than the lenses! Confused


Reply

55 wrote:
eggplant wrote:
Very nice to know this exists- I had been looking for brochures like this, which have diagrams, but all mostly in America hidden behind expensive shipping...

Thanks for the upload.

You're welcome.
Yes, I really enjoy finding brochures for third party lenses. And this one was a pleasant surprise:
Full specs and it's even printed on nice, textured paper.


RokkorDoctor wrote:
What is the significance of the shaded lens elements in the diagrams?

That's a good question. At first glance, it would appear that cemented groups are shaded. But that doesn't seem to apply in all cases.
Maybe there are mistakes? Or maybe the shading is just marketing razzle dazzle? Wink

I can confirm my copy of the Rexagon 100mm does have a cemented triplet. Alas, that triplet also has some separation.
And I know the Rexagon 135mm which came along with the brochure also has cemented elements... because it too has separation!

The brochure is better made than the lenses! Confused


I first thought cemented lenses as well, but as you say, that is not the case for one of these designs.

My best guess would be that they indicate what were at the time considered to be low dispersion glass elements.


Reply

there appear to be two Prinz brands, one was used by Dixons in UK. But their lenses wew simply branded Prinz, no name. Looking at them they probably came from the same budget maker


Reply

RokkorDoctor wrote:
. . .
My best guess would be that they indicate what were at the time considered to be low dispersion glass elements.

Interesting. I usually associate "exotic" glass with first party manufacturers. But I'm not knowledgeable.


philslizzy wrote:
there appear to be two Prinz brands, one was used by Dixons in UK. But their lenses wew simply branded Prinz, no name. Looking at them they probably came from the same budget maker

Yes, it would be intriguing to know for certain if there was an association between the two.


Reply

RokkorDoctor wrote:
that is not the case for one of these designs.

That one may be just an mistake. I think it indicates cemented lenses too.


Reply

I have a Rexagon 28mm 1:2.8, BUT it is Exa mount.