 Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:21 pm Post subject: Results from KONICA Autoreflex TC |
 |
|
pentaxpete wrote:
I took the rest of the 2007 outdated Fuji Acros 100 film that was used for my Olympus OM2n tests, using the Konica Autoreflex TC set that I have 'taken over' from my Boy who was given it years ago by a Rich local businessman
I used all three KONICA lenses, the 28mm f3.5 Hexanon AR, 50mm f1.7 Hexanon AR and 200mm f4 Hexar. I conclude that the KONICA lenses are NOT as good as the Olympus ZUIKO lenses I tested on the OM2n. At wide apertures there is edge fall-off under a x6 magnifier. The 'HEXAR' is supposed to be made as a 'cheaper version' of the 'Hexanons' by Tamron
28mm f3.5 Hexanon AR at f5.6, 1/500th sec, Yellow Filter - a 'real street photo' not a 'lens test'
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 04 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
28mm f3.5 Hexanon at f3.5, Yellow filter, bricks on edge not resolved
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 03 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
50mm f1.7 Hexanon AR 1/1000th at f2, Red Filter, detail of small Cupola hear Centre Edge is good but there is fall-off at bottom
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 02 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
50mm f1.7 Hexanon at f5.6 + Cokin Grad Pink filter
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 01 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
200mm f4 Hexar at full aperture, 1/500th second, tripod, brick detail a bit soft-- evidence of 'back focus'
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 07 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
200mm f4 Hexar at full aperture, carefully focussed, a bit soft
 Konica Autoreflex TC test 06 by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
_________________
Long Live REAL PHOTOGRAPHY ! |
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
