View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
asterinex
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:19 am Post subject: Questions about different 28/2.0 lenses |
|
|
asterinex wrote:
I have a few options on a 28mm 2.0 :
* Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2 : 60 euros
* Petri 28/2 : 60 euros
* Pentax smc 28/2.0 (aka Zeiss Hollywood) 350 euros.
All Pentax K Mount.
Can the Vivitar and the Petri compete with the Pentax ?
60 euros vs 350 euros is a big difference.
What would you do ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
I've got an old article hear from Amateur Photography in which the Kiron is tested.
It's called a 'good overal general purpose wide angle' with 'acceptable' wide open performance. Center and edge definition and contrast are 'very good' but not excellent.
I think it's definitely a good lens, but nothing spectacular. I guess the Petri isn't spectacular either. Maybe the Pentax is....
Best 28mm I ever used was a Nikkor Ai-s 28mm f/2.8, but you have a stop less. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:41 am Post subject: Re: Questions about different 28/2.0 lenses |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
asterinex wrote: |
I have a few options on a 28mm 2.0 :
* Vivitar (Kiron) 28/2 : 60 euros
* Petri 28/2 : 60 euros
* Pentax smc 28/2.0 (aka Zeiss Hollywood) 350 euros.
All Pentax K Mount.
Can the Vivitar and the Petri compete with the Pentax ?
60 euros vs 350 euros is a big difference.
What would you do ? |
Well if you want value for your money......does it have to be F2 as f2.8 lenses are very good....anyway the Vivitar is very soft WO and not much use, stopped down my Kiron copy is sharp but not razor sharp. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Are you using this prospective lens on a FF or APS-C or micro 4/3 camera?
Here is the Kiron Kino 28mm f2 on APS_C
It is very good.
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Bokeh looks very nice to me on that picture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The Petri is a Cosina, a mediocre lens, okay stopped down. The Kiron is a good lens but it's poor wide open.
The difference between f2.0and f2.8 is negligible in practice, so you'd be much better off buying one of the excellent 2.8s. The Nikkor AI-S 2.8/28 has the reputation of being really superb and it's cheap. If your camera can use it, the Minolta 2.8/28 is superb too. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
For 60 euros, I would grab the Kiron provided it is in good shape - check oil on aperture blades.
The Nikon AI-S 2.8 is a fine lens but sells for more and isn't adding much for the extra dollars in my view.
60 euros sounds like quite a sweet deal on the Kiron.
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
F2.8 is more than adequate if you are using digital camera with good high ISO performance. If you really want a cheapest F2 lens with decent PQ, you may consider a Kiron/Komine or a Soligor C/D which both can be found on K/M42 mount. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
For 60 euros, I would grab the Kiron provided it is in good shape - check oil on aperture blades.
The Nikon AI-S 2.8 is a fine lens but sells for more and isn't adding much for the extra dollars in my view.
60 euros sounds like quite a sweet deal on the Kiron.
OH |
That's too much for the Kiron imho, 20-30 euros is what I see it selling for in the UK. The Nikkor AI-S 2.8./28 sells for less than double that.
The Kiron isn't a faster lens really as it's poor wide open, needs to be shot at f4 or less. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
For 60 euros, I would grab the Kiron provided it is in good shape - check oil on aperture blades.
The Nikon AI-S 2.8 is a fine lens but sells for more and isn't adding much for the extra dollars in my view.
60 euros sounds like quite a sweet deal on the Kiron.
OH |
That's too much for the Kiron imho, 20-30 euros is what I see it selling for in the UK. The Nikkor AI-S 2.8./28 sells for less than double that.
|
Congratulations if you can find a Nikkor at that price, but ebay prices are much higher. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
F2.8 is more than adequate if you are using digital camera with good high ISO performance. If you really want a cheapest F2 lens with decent PQ, you may consider a Kiron/Komine or a Soligor C/D which both can be found on K/M42 mount. |
For 60 euros I'd think about a Sigma 24mm f2.8 superwide II _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asterinex
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asterinex wrote:
thx for the responses. Anyone Experience with the Pentax smc 28/2.0.
I've read somewhere that is the same as the Distagon 28/2.0 Hollywood ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
F2.8 is more than adequate if you are using digital camera with good high ISO performance. If you really want a cheapest F2 lens with decent PQ, you may consider a Kiron/Komine or a Soligor C/D which both can be found on K/M42 mount. |
For 60 euros I'd think about a Sigma 24mm f2.8 superwide II |
Yes. The wider, the better. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
asterinex wrote: |
thx for the responses. Anyone Experience with the Pentax smc 28/2.0.
I've read somewhere that is the same as the Distagon 28/2.0 Hollywood ? |
Yes, I've also read that. I would definitely pick one up if the prices wouldn't be insane.
Still, I doubt that the Pentax will be better than a Nikkor Ais 28/2.8, which is pretty much flawless. Question remains whether you can fit a Nikkor to your camera. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
You should only buy an "cheap" ~F2 wide angle (<40mm) lens if you really really need the speed for lowlight quite often and don't have the money imho.
I've never seen a cheap and fast wide angle that didn't offend my eyes at least slightly when used wide open.
If F2.8 is enough than try to find a nice F2.8, they have a better price/perfomance ratio!
If you wan't something that is fast and good you have to pay let's say 300€ and more - but you will clearly see the difference, especially below F5.6! _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Get the pentax K smc 28mm f2.0, and forget the other mentioned.
The other you should consider is zeiss 28/2, konica uc 28/1.8,
I dont have the nikon d 24/1.4, nor the nikon afs 28/1.8.
Next is nikon ais 28/2, pentax A 28/2, these are very good too.
There are other fast 28 as well, and i dont have them either... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|