Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Question about bokeh for S-M-C Tak 50mm 1.4
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:48 am    Post subject: Question about bokeh for S-M-C Tak 50mm 1.4 Reply with quote

Hi everyone,

I recently acquired a S-M-C Tak 50mm 1.4 and have a question about the bokeh. I've uploaded a sample image, showing what string lights look like out of focus. There appears to be a ring inside of the bokeh spheres and I was wondering if this is normal for this lens?



Thanks.[/img]


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello,

The image is not visible here,

Renato


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:05 am    Post subject: Re: Question about bokeh for S-M-C Tak 50mm 1.4 Reply with quote

DrGeaux wrote:
Hi everyone,

I recently acquired a S-M-C Tak 50mm 1.4 and have a question about the bokeh. I've uploaded a sample image, showing what string lights look like out of focus. There appears to be a ring inside of the bokeh spheres and I was wondering if this is normal for this lens?



Thanks.[/img]


Now it's visible (anti-spam measure).

I don't have Takumar, but I don't think it's normal for any lens.


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't recall seeing anything like that with any of my Tak 50's
I have seen something like it when rain drops land on the front element, shine a flashlight through the lens and look at the elements for something.


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can you replicate it? If not, it may have been the type of lights in the background.


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The rings inside the light?.. that would be part of the light surely?


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies everyone.

Lightshow: I've used a flashlight to look through the lens and don't see anything that looks obviously wrong. Just a few specs of dust inside, which I think is normal.

David: Yes, I am able to replicate it. Below is another example (although these are the same lights in a tree). I see the same problem with small point sources of light when I've done test shots at home though. I also used a small LED flashlight (with about 5 LEDs inside) and don't notice the problem much. The LED flashlight is much brighter though and I think it was slightly overexposed, which may have hid the problem. I'll try again to see if I can replicate it with a lower exposure.



PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not normal...

Those are reflections of the inside of the lens, lit by stray light bouncing around in there. The stray light could be leaking in from the edge of lens element(s) -- check edges of elements are blackened -- wait a minute! -- after looking again, I'm changing my mind here. Smile I think those are what leds look like! Especially when properly exposed. That dark central ring... So, yes, normal photos of (lit) leds...


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try a different light source.


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LEDs have a central silicon chip, with a reflector around it, so that is probably consistent with that.....


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lightshow wrote:
Try a different light source.


+1

dnas wrote:
LEDs have a central silicon chip, with a reflector around it, so that is probably consistent with that.....


sounds like the explanation already


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies everyone. I think I may have confused people by mentioning LED lights. The images I previously posted were from non-LED christmas tree lights. I've posted a pic below that shows 3 images: the first shows the string lights in focus so you can see what type of lights these are (they are the old style string lights), the second shows the same shot out of focus and stopped down a bit, and the final one is wide open, showing the rings within the bokeh.



The final image shows the out of focus area of another shot with different types of lights. The yellowish spheres on the right are reflections from an overhead CFL in the room and the green sphere in the center is a small LED light. It's not as noticeable as it is in some of the other shots, but I can still see rings here as well.



Thanks again for the help.


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Resembles an) Airy Disk (effect?):

Airy Disk (wikipedia)


In first photo of latest reply I see a dark ring around the top of the uppermost lamp where glass is tapered & pinched, but that doesn't explain the dark ring from fluorescent lamp in third photo...

Could be light leakage inside lens body from unblackened edge of element(s).


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dnas wrote:
LEDs have a central silicon chip, with a reflector around it, so that is probably consistent with that.....

I wouldn't expect it see detail from the lights being so out of focus and all.

Am I correct that it changes as you stop down?
What about focus distance?


PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lightshow wrote:
Am I correct that it changes as you stop down?
What about focus distance?


I'm not sure if it really changes as I stop down. From the test shots I took, it's certainly less noticeable when shot at f2 or higher than when shot wide open at f1.4, but it might just be that the out of focus areas are less diffuse and are brighter, which may hide the ring artifact I'm seeing. I will try to test tonight to see if this makes a difference and also test the effects of focus distance.


PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a bit of a puzzler. I've seen this before, perhaps to the same or more likely to a slightly lesser degree, in some lenses that have an aspherical element. My personal suspicion is that your Tak has an (unintentional) aspherical element--that one or more of the elements was ground improperly (it could be an interaction) so that it is not spherical. Another option (I would suppose, maybe I'm wrong) is an issue in the homogeneity of the glass (vertically) of one or more of the elements, such that a portion of it has a slightly different index of refraction.


PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously tho... how are those 200% crops going to affect the actual subjects you focus on. I.e The thing worth taking a photo off? Unless of course you like round glowing balls in that case might i direct you to MS Paint. It has this wonderful circle tool where one can literally draw as many as one chooses. And better yet. They scale wonderfully at any zoom level!

Just take the Photos man. Wink


PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tromboads wrote:
Seriously tho... how are those 200% crops going to affect the actual subjects you focus on. I.e The thing worth taking a photo off? Unless of course you like round glowing balls in that case might i direct you to MS Paint. It has this wonderful circle tool where one can literally draw as many as one chooses. And better yet. They scale wonderfully at any zoom level!

Just take the Photos man. Wink


While you're right that the majority of my photos are not of out of focus lights, I have to disagree. I wasn't pixel peeping at zoomed in shots when I noticed the artifacts; they were noticeable enough to distract my eye as I was reviewing regular portraits taken during a family gathering. One of the (many) reasons I specifically got a 50/1.4 Tak is its reputation for great bokeh, and to me, the artifacts are enough to distract from the actual subjects of my shots in some of the photos I took. From the test shots I saw prior to buying it (and from the comments here), it does seem to be abnormal. For shots with a more complex background, it's not really noticeable and makes great images. I will certainly continue to shoot with it but I think I'll keep my eyes open for another one to do a comparison.