Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Pentax vs Jupiter
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:14 pm    Post subject: Pentax vs Jupiter Reply with quote

My question is:
which is better choice:
Pentax M 135mm f 3.5 and Pentax 200mm f / 4
or
Jupiter A 37 135mm and jupiter 21M 200mm
now I have a Pentax K10D + K100D
and I like more and more lenses manuals.
thanks


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I can't say anything about the jupiter.

But as a Pentax owner, you NEED to have the Super Takumar 150/4 and the SMC-M 200/4. Those two are fabulous.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

None of them expensive lenses take all and select by your self what is the best ones for you.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These lenses are very close each other . I have the four , and I find the J-37 more saturated , "harder" than the takumar 135 . The j-21 is a bit more sharp at full aperture but the smc-tak 200 is better at f/8 in contrast and saturation , the single-coated give comparable results .. . However , the differences are small...
Russian lenses give not the same general "rendition" than takumars . the four lenses perform very well ... If I had today to choose among these lenses , i'll buy the four again ! Mr. Green


PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

another good option might be the super Takuma 200


PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

revinhood wrote:
another good option might be the super Takuma 200


I have very good experience with Super and SMC Takumar 200mm f4 you will won't dissapoint any of them


PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hallo!
The Pentax 200/4 is very good.
I tested it on my flickr-side.

Wonderfull soft mechanic.

regards Peter


PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on the type of shots you want and your taste?
The Pentax are much better. They have more resolution.
The Russian lenses are sharp when stopped down but still don't have great resolution. Many people like this it can be seen as a nice sharp smooth image. Very good for portraits etc.
The 135 and 200 Jupiters are fairly cheap. I have noticed the pentax lenses are going up and up, so I would buy SAP.

PS I have the Tamron Adaptall 2 f3.5 200mm as well as the Super Takumar f4 200mm. They are almost equal but I just prefer the Tamron. I sold my Pentax 135mm a while back as I never used it much. Nothing wrong with it and it is a neat sized lens.