View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 9:58 pm Post subject: pentax bayonet mount wide angle lenses |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
Hi,
I have a stubborn friend who has a Pentax APS-C camera (I don't remember the exact model).
He has a strong foundation in analog photography but struggles with digital technology.
I am too tired of his bs (remember-stuborn) to explain anything else/more to him..
Despite my better judgment, I want to help him by suggesting some lenses in the Pentax bayonet mount for his camera. These lenses will be used in an improvised studio for photographing fine furniture items.
So I am strictly looking for Pentax bayonet mount lenses only - no other workarounds.
I am familiar with the Pentax ME period and the 28/2.8 lens, although I have never personally used/seen one.
Question: Can you recommend any other potential contenders in the Pentax bayonet mount for his setup? _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 523 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Seeing as this is a Manual Focus forum, I'm assuming you're after m/f suggestions.
A little more subject matter detail might be helpful ... "fine furniture" could cover quite a wide range of sizes, also how big is the "studio"?
Will a "standard" lens be adequate, in which case the aforementioned 28mm f/2.8 will be fine, but for wider angle options things can start to get a bit more esoteric ... lenses much wider than 28mm were fairly thin on the ground back in manual-focus times, so will likely often be collector items in this day and age.
The Tamron Adaptall-2 24mm f/2.5 or even the 17mm f/3.5 aren't usually too expensive, though the PK/A mounts for them often command a premium price
Vivitar sold some nice PK/A mount m/f lenses and any Sigma offering might be worth considering.
If your friend is happy with totally manual exposure ... not usually a problem with a Pentax DSLR, a slightly wider range of suggestions could be available.
PS :- Confirmation of which model camera is being used might be interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2024 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
My Pentax K10 is APS-C, and the best wide lens is the 18-55 / 3.5 5.6 kit lens, it was always rated as one of the best kit lenses back in the day and it is a very decent performer. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11044 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35 for awesome image quality and close-focus ability. With PK adapter, of course. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
titrisol70
Joined: 14 Dec 2021 Posts: 183 Location: State of Denial
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
titrisol70 wrote:
Pentax smc-A series work great with the DSLRs
The 28/2.8 and the (rarer) 24/2.8 are good
There is a 15mm but I have only seen it on catalogues
But he'd like to explore the F and FA series which are similar optically but have AF
The 20 and 24mm are very good
Or even the 21mm Limited line which is outstanding
PS, I'm also a stubborn Pentaxian _________________ Pentaxian and proud
Cameras: Spotmatic, I and F, Pentax ME, MESuper, ME-F, P30t, K-x, MZ-5, Mz-7 // K100D, Kx, K5IIs, K3-iii
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Super Takumar 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/28, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50 (7-element), 1:3.5/135
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:4/200
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50
Lots of M, A, F, FA, DA series lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
The SMC Pentax-m and or Pentax-a 24-50mm 1:4 could also be considered. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
great, good answers, thanx.
@kypfer: i see i could go deeper in explaining stuff.
I'll summarize now; fine furniture is handmade 'furniture' made of wood,
very arty/designy, often made from exotic wood.
'studio' is his workplace, with indirect daylight from above,
some high hanging industrial light (cold) and old Tungsteen studio lights.
I wrote "wide" and Im thinking of std. wide as 24 / 28 / 35 (max) ..
so normal common budget wide lenses, nothing wild and special.
So also stuff as Cosina, Vivitar and other.
Now im writing this i remember of Revue brand (Cosina).
They were on pentax bayonet too.
So i suppose there would be some (nice?) lenses, not to be expensive.
I'm not aware of DA 18-55 and that lens good is, i will suggest it.
He has learned to use mf lenses (kinda) so thats good for now. _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
The SMC Pentax DA 35mm 1:2.4 AL plastic fantastic is also a great option. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
titrisol70
Joined: 14 Dec 2021 Posts: 183 Location: State of Denial
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
titrisol70 wrote:
The DA18-55 is the "kit lens" in most Pentax DSLRs. Surprinsingly good for the price
Also the upgrade is the Pentax 17-70 which I havent tried
If you are thinking off-brand, there are a couple of AF zooms from Tamron (17-50 and 28-70) and Sigma (18-50 and 17-70) that are cheap and very good but the pentax DA kit lens is in the same realm (and cheaper)
alex_d wrote: |
great, good answers, thanx.
@kypfer: i see i could go deeper in explaining stuff.
I'll summarize now; fine furniture is handmade 'furniture' made of wood,
very arty/designy, often made from exotic wood.
'studio' is his workplace, with indirect daylight from above,
some high hanging industrial light (cold) and old Tungsteen studio lights.
I wrote "wide" and Im thinking of std. wide as 24 / 28 / 35 (max) ..
so normal common budget wide lenses, nothing wild and special.
So also stuff as Cosina, Vivitar and other.
Now im writing this i remember of Revue brand (Cosina).
They were on pentax bayonet too.
So i suppose there would be some (nice?) lenses, not to be expensive.
I'm not aware of DA 18-55 and that lens good is, i will suggest it.
He has learned to use mf lenses (kinda) so thats good for now. |
_________________ Pentaxian and proud
Cameras: Spotmatic, I and F, Pentax ME, MESuper, ME-F, P30t, K-x, MZ-5, Mz-7 // K100D, Kx, K5IIs, K3-iii
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Super Takumar 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/28, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50 (7-element), 1:3.5/135
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:4/200
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50
Lots of M, A, F, FA, DA series lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
My Pentax DSLRs are not ideal for manual focusing, the ancient K100d has a dim viewfinder (due to using pentamirror design instead of a pentaprism)
The K7 & K5 were brighter but still much harder to focus than my film Pentaxs. None of these have focus peaking, which I believe some later models have when in live view.
DA series lenses are be designed for Pentax APSC DSLRs (As long as he doesn't have a K1 which is full frame) any for them will work well as will DFA and older F & FA series lenses - these are auto focus.
A series lenses will work perfectly well as manually focused glass, allowing all exposure modes etc. (This applies to non Pentax PKA lenses as well, there are thousands of them!)
The M & K series (earlier manual focus) lenses will also work, but need special 'stop down metering' steps taken to meter correctly. M42 lenses involve just the same steps once an adapter is screwed onto the lens (with some adapters a flange will affect focusing - those that fit entirely inside the mount can have the locking spring unscrewed & can be left on the lens effectively making it PK)
There are excellent examples in all of these series, but for a wide view on APSC the DA lenses are generally best. Full frame lenses need to make more compromises to achieve the greater coverage. Full frame lens wider than 24mm tend to be considerable more expensive.
The various DA18-55 kit zooms aren't bad but the DA* 16-50 f/2.8 is apparently considered a big improvement
If going with primes the DA35 is great value for money but not really wide, so the DA21 limited & DA15 limited (both reportedly fantastic lenses) might be more suitable.
I have the DA10-17 fisheye which is near the ultimate in wide angles, but the fisheye distortion probably wouldn't be acceptable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 523 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
great, good answers, thanx.
@kypfer:
I wrote "wide" and Im thinking of std. wide as 24 / 28 / 35 (max) ..
so normal common budget wide lenses, nothing wild and special.
So also stuff as Cosina, Vivitar and other.
Now im writing this i remember of Revue brand (Cosina).
They were on pentax bayonet too.
So i suppose there would be some (nice?) lenses, not to be expensive.
I'm not aware of DA 18-55 and that lens good is, i will suggest it.
He has learned to use mf lenses (kinda) so thats good for now. |
All understood ... you've just got to remember that a "standard" on an APS-C sensor is a 28-35mm lens, if you really do want "wide-angle" you're looking for 24mm and wider.
The other criteria, (apart from manual or auto-focus), is whether auto-exposure is needed (PKA mount, with the little electrical contacts) or the original PK mount, which requires an amount of knowledgeable intervention ... nothing insurmountable, just a case of the operator "knowing what they're doing"
Apart from all that, if a/f is acceptable, I'll agree with the other posters, the "kit" 18-55mm lens really is exceptional value for money, though it does benefit from a lens-hood to give of it's best, possibly even moreso in a "studio" environment with multiple light sources. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
The model is from around 2018 or '19,
and it was about the same price back then as the XE3.
I was explaining to him and showing all the adapters,
lenses, focus peaking, and all those nice things that mirrorless cameras can do.
He went home happy, only to call me a few days later saying,
"Hey, I got a Pentax. I've been using them before, so they should be the same or similar." _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
@DConvert and all other
ok thanx, good replys and informative.
I was not aware of the stuff you wrote as no prev experience with digital pentaxes
Well I told him over the phone some stuff I've read here ..
but i had to cut the call cause stubbornness is beyond the acceptable ..
Don't try to help people who do not want to be helped! _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pepperberry farm
Joined: 02 Jan 2017 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pepperberry farm wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
Don't try to help people who do not want to be helped! |
^^^ this ^^^
if you're looking for wide, the SMC A 20/2.8 and SMC 18/3.5 are about as wide as he will find for the manual focus end...
however, the DA 14/2.8 is a magnificent lens if he's looking for autofocus in the K-mount.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
titrisol70
Joined: 14 Dec 2021 Posts: 183 Location: State of Denial
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
titrisol70 wrote:
If his model is from 18 or 19 it must be a K3 or K7, and yeah they have all those features
alex_d wrote: |
I was explaining to him and showing all the adapters,
lenses, focus peaking, and all those nice things that mirrorless cameras can do.
|
_________________ Pentaxian and proud
Cameras: Spotmatic, I and F, Pentax ME, MESuper, ME-F, P30t, K-x, MZ-5, Mz-7 // K100D, Kx, K5IIs, K3-iii
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Super Takumar 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/28, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50 (7-element), 1:3.5/135
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:4/200
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50
Lots of M, A, F, FA, DA series lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2024 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Around that time K3 II, KP and K-70 were current aps-c models _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014 Posts: 116 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2024 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
I have Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f2.8 and Mini Wide II 28mm f2.8 in PK mount, both great lenses considering the price |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
ok thanx all ! _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
titrisol70 wrote: |
If his model is from 18 or 19 it must be a K3 or K7, and yeah they have all those features
alex_d wrote: |
I was explaining to him and showing all the adapters,
lenses, focus peaking, and all those nice things that mirrorless cameras can do.
|
|
The K7 was somewhat earlier - I got mine in 2011. I suspect you were thinking of the k-70 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|