View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:31 am Post subject: Pentax A 35-70 f4 |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
Well it arrived and well.. and Ho Hum.
Condition appears good, took it for a walk and contrast was, well it was fine. But just fine.
The macro capacity is great / handy, and I can see how this becomes a favourable walk around do everything lens.
I compared it to my old 35mm Super Tak, and @ 3.5 it's sharper then this thing at f4. At f4 the Super Tak is sharper again.
Still images out of the 35-70 are not bad. they just aren't "wow!" And that shouldn't be a negative. If I wanted to pack lightly. I think I'd be comfortable taking this. And with any modern DSLR stop it down to f8 and go nuts,
I still can't get into the "A" setting on my Pentax bodies, I'm just to used to selecting the aperture with the control on the lens, and for how I shoot, the "A" setting doesn't do anything for me.
Still, pair this with a Super Program, a 70-something or other and I'd be ready to fit right into to 1984.
I might try it with the flashes for a bit first before I sell it on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Hamburg-Germany
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul wrote:
this lens should be the best 35-70-lens that Pentax made!
I had it too (an yes: I also had the M 2.8-3.5/35-70).
The only thing I was missing:
Greater wide angle.... and therefore I sold this lens.
It has been tested by german "fotomagazin" resulting in the highest ranking "super".
(Nearly) No fall off to the corners, no difference in IQ betwenn the focal lengths, good macro function, good build quality (compared to the push-pull-version 3.5-4.5/35-70).
Therefore the price of this lens are quite high (at least here in Germany):
What did you pay for it? _________________ Paul
(SLR-experiences since 1981)
Pentax and Canon - Sony digital as well
too many lenses and flashes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
I got it for $100.
And look I agree. corners look good, its sharp, not crazy sharp.. but just bland.. It's like a Toyota corolla? Perhaps I'm being to hard on it. My overall initial response was underwhelmed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/301301-just-me-f-35-70-insanely-over-rated-lens.html
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
I agree.
Now someone buy it off me and argue differently |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul
Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Hamburg-Germany
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul wrote:
They are talking about the AF lens over there - not about the Pentax A 4.0/35-70!
Different lens design, different class:
The A 3.5-4.5/35-70 is nearly identical to the F 35-70.
The differences between the two A -lenses is well known....
Completely different price ranges too! _________________ Paul
(SLR-experiences since 1981)
Pentax and Canon - Sony digital as well
too many lenses and flashes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
Paul wrote: |
They are talking about the AF lens over there - not about the Pentax A 4.0/35-70!
Different lens design, different class:
The A 3.5-4.5/35-70 is nearly identical to the F 35-70.
The differences between the two A -lenses is well known....
Completely different price ranges too! |
My Bad. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
The SMC Pentax A 35-70/4 is a deceptive little gem. It doesn't look like a whole lot (it's a bit "plasticky" feeling compared to some of the bigger Pentax "macro zooms" of that era), but it is quite capable (within its somewhat limited range) of providing quite good images. And, its so-called "macro" function is significantly better than that function in some other "macro zooms". (For example, its "macro" setting is better than that of the otherwise sublime A 35-105/3.5.) I've had many a nice walkabout over the last umteen years with one of these lenses (it's nice and light, too). _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|