Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Pentax 6x7, TriX400, 55/3.5, 135/4, 400/4
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:01 pm    Post subject: Pentax 6x7, TriX400, 55/3.5, 135/4, 400/4 Reply with quote

My last film with the 6x7 :

#1 Aramon, @f/5,6


#2 @f/4


#3 @f/4


#4 @f/4,8


#5 She's holding the 400/4, @f/4


#6 Jardin des plantes of Montpellier, @f/4


Do not hesitate to comment or critic Wink


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, that 400mm lens looks like mine MTO-1000 Very Happy


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

***Do not hesitate to comment or critic***


Someone has lost their brains in the last one Smile and the first shot is not to the same standard as the others for IQ.


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All very nice. #5:Almost pornography Shocked


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

55mm gives great depth of field in that photo! @f/5.6?! Shocked

400mm photos have Takumar "look", colors, bokeh, sharp! Big separation of subject; I wish for a little for dof in #4 to bring trees into focus, then photo would have stunning 3D effects imho.

135mm makes nice portrait lens; and does great ~1:2 macro!

Are you handholding that giant slr? bam!-swish-swish-thunk!, you know what I mean Cool just don't get mistaken for artillery lol! Nice work.


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some seem to be a bit too over-sharpened, no? Especially photo #3.

I liked the results, keep them coming Wink


PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shauttra wrote:
Wow, that 400mm lens looks like mine MTO-1000 Very Happy


Front filters are 108mm according to my readings. There is a rear screw in rim of.... 77mm Laughing

Excalibur wrote:
***Do not hesitate to comment or critic***


Someone has lost their brains in the last one Smile and the first shot is not to the same standard as the others for IQ.


I dont know what it is (I neither nor what a brain is, I 'dont have one Razz ), next time I'll search if there is an indication.
The first shot was not as far PP'd as the others for brightness and contrast Wink


lulalake wrote:
All very nice. #5:Almost pornography Shocked


Perversed mind Twisted Evil


siriusdogstar wrote:
55mm gives great depth of field in that photo! @f/5.6?! Shocked

400mm photos have Takumar "look", colors, bokeh, sharp! Big separation of subject; I wish for a little for dof in #4 to bring trees into focus, then photo would have stunning 3D effects imho.

135mm makes nice portrait lens; and does great ~1:2 macro!

Are you handholding that giant slr? bam!-swish-swish-thunk!, you know what I mean Cool just don't get mistaken for artillery lol! Nice work.


- f/5,6, maybe f/8 but not more (it is a 26mm equivalent).
-On #4 I didn't want to close the diaphragm (as for other samples) because I mainly use py lenses at full aperture, so I need to know their rendering, I know I'll get a little more sharpness and dof when I stop the lens (and star shaped OOFH's with the 400/4) Wink
- The 135/4 is "only" 1:3,2, not 1:2
- And yes, I always use the 6x7 handheld, the only two shots I did on tripod were fireworks and I can't hold it for seconds without shaking Laughing