| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Rolf wrote:
and here with Canon FD f:2.8/28mm S.C.
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Here few shots into the botany with a low cost Kalimar f:1:3.5-4.8/35-70mm with Konica mount.
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wilson.c
Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Posts: 364
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilson.c wrote:
Rolf,
Great shots! I think I will take something like a 80-200mm zoom to the MotoGP in Malaysia in October with my GF-1. That would render the lens a 160-400mm for those long shots. Better bring my monopod as well, right?
_________________
Wilson
DSLR: Canon 5DMkII, 500D + Panasonic GF-1
SLR: Canon T90, Canon F1, Canon A1, Canon AE1 + Rolleiflex SL66 + Bronica ETRs
R'finder: Contax G1, G2 + Leica M6, M3 + Contax II
Lenses
M42: Angenieaux 90/1.8
Canon: FD 50/3.5 Macro, FD 80/1.8, FD 80-200L/4
Contax G: CZ Hologon 16/8, CZ Biogon 21/2.8, CZ Biogon 28/2.8, CZ Planar 45/2.0, CZ Sonnar 90/2.8
P-Six: CZJ Sonnar 180/2.8, CZJ Biometar 120/2.8
Contax: Distagon 28/2.8, Distagon 28/2, Planar 85/1.4, Makro-Planar 100/2.8
Others: CZ Sonnar 135/3.5 (Hasselblad V mount)
More little ones to be documented.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
| wilson.c wrote: |
Rolf,
Great shots! I think I will take something like a 80-200mm zoom to the MotoGP in Malaysia in October with my GF-1. That would render the lens a 160-400mm for those long shots. Better bring my monopod as well, right? |
For 300 to 400mm yes, good idea. But would test ir before because no 80-200 has a tripod mount. So you need it with your cam.
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Time to add few shots to keep this thread alive
Pana G1 & Super Tak 2/55mm
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
...... and a last one ...
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 2050
Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
Hadn't seen this thread before... gives me hope that I might achieve something with my 'new' G2?
Doug
PS I get far better shots with the 55mm SMC f2 than with the Supertak f1.4 - both at F4 any ideas why? Both focused using x10 manual focus assist so sharpness is down to the lenses not my bad eyesight!
_________________
Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
anktonio
Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Posts: 219
Location: Spain
Expire: 2017-02-22
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
anktonio wrote:
| nemesis101 wrote: |
Hadn't seen this thread before... gives me hope that I might achieve something with my 'new' G2?
Doug
PS I get far better shots with the 55mm SMC f2 than with the Supertak f1.4 - both at F4 any ideas why? Both focused using x10 manual focus assist so sharpness is down to the lenses not my bad eyesight! |
You can do anything with your G2. Neither limits 
I guess both lens in good condition. SMC is multicoated, Supertak no. The difference is important and can be noticed by your eyes. In addition, SMC has less commitment to the luminosity, which obtains gain in others aspects. I think your appreciation is logical and correct.
Happy shots! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I haven't noticed a difference in sharpness between smc and super takumar lenses. Perhaps the 50/1.4 was a bit faulty.
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012
Posts: 1318
Location: Conwy N Wales
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:56 pm Post subject: moon shot with g1 and adaptall 300mm 60B+2x TC |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
_________________
pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
