View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Fotal
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 282 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-08-21
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: Oily blades |
|
|
Fotal wrote:
Someone made a comment (sorry, don't remember who) that oily blades can be bad in cold weather as they might break.
Are there any other reasons that I should consider a cleaning of the Jupiter-9 I just picked up? _________________ Mr Scott please restrain your leaps of illogic. I have said nothing. I was merely speculating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Usually it's not an issue with preset lenses like the jupiter 9. In auto lenses the blades have to move quickly so if they are 'gummy' then they simply may not close. In cold weather the oil will thicken, so you have to be careful of that...as long as you turn the aperture slowly there shouldn't be any hang-up. If there is, never ever ever force it.
Besides that fact, the jupiter 9 is, or so I've heard, incredibly difficult to reassemble correctly. Many of the lemons on the market are due to people taking them apart and not being able to get them quite right again. This is not to say anything about your ability in the matter...just making you aware of the fact. Attila, I know, is of the camp that you NEVER disassemble a lens that doesn't absolutely need it.
Hope that helps in some regard.
~Marc
Last edited by themoleman342 on Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fotal
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 282 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-08-21
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fotal wrote:
Thanks Marc!
I can imagine that some lenses needs very special care when put together again after a dismantling. I'm thinking that there must be some factory service instructions for all the serivice shops?
Anyway, I'll leave it for now. The J-9 is otherwise in a very good shape but I have no adapter for it yet to try it out on the camera. _________________ Mr Scott please restrain your leaps of illogic. I have said nothing. I was merely speculating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I have taken several lenses apart and tried to re-assemble them.
With some it was pretty easy. Other lenses seem to have a kind of "recursive" design: you only get the inner ring fixed if the outer ring is already at its place, but this outer ring only goes there if the inner ring is fixed.
Don't laugh, this happens. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fotal
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 282 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-08-21
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fotal wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
I have taken several lenses apart and tried to re-assemble them.
With some it was pretty easy. Other lenses seem to have a kind of "recursive" design: you only get the inner ring fixed if the outer ring is already at its place, but this outer ring only goes there if the inner ring is fixed.
Don't laugh, this happens. |
sounds like you need a special Star Trek tool to handle these situations _________________ Mr Scott please restrain your leaps of illogic. I have said nothing. I was merely speculating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
The Jupiter-9's reputation for being difficult to reassemble, I think, comes mainly from the focus helical system of the Leica rangefinder version of the lens. In that one, if you separate the focus helical and the rangefinder cam, your chances of getting it back together right are almost zero. Getting to the diaphragm, though, is not so hard, and the focus system isn't as bad in other versions of the lens... though the focus helical of any SLR lens tends to have a sort of "Catch-22" feel to it during reassembly.
Oil on the blades of an auto-diaphragm lens is a disabling problem, but on a preset or rangefinder lens you don't need to worry until the ring begins to feel stiff. When you get to that point, don't force it because you can damage the blades. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:25 pm Post subject: Re: Oily blades |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Fotal wrote: |
Someone made a comment (sorry, don't remember who) that oily blades can be bad in cold weather as they might break.
Are there any other reasons that I should consider a cleaning of the Jupiter-9 I just picked up? |
That could be me, as I've broken some J-9 aperture blades while trying my freshly unpackaged and cold lens
A russian eBay seller sold me - on my request ! - a complete blades set, and now I have to figure out how can I fit them inside the J9...
_________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
OUCH! how hard did you push on the aperture ring? _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
In similar cases I can't fixed my Steinheil Culminar 85mm f2.8 even if I spent hours with that,if any blade damaged minimally it not works any more. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
rick_oleson wrote: |
OUCH! how hard did you push on the aperture ring? |
Not hard at all ! In fact, aperture ring was OK to turn but as the blades were sticky each other and are so thin and fragile, ... _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hacksawbob
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1293 Location: LANCS UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hacksawbob wrote:
you ca get to the rear of the aperture quite easily the front assembly screws out from the rear. you could treat this with lighter fluid and q tip, then reassemble use for a few more months then repeat each time reducing the amount of oil on the blades. as you use the lens the oil will transfer from front to back and gradualy you will reduce the ammount of oil on the blades. Here is my most recent J9 acquisition an single coated 74 version,
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ LENS LIST |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Actually my problem is to put the blades back in the lens. I guess I have to dismantle it more than what I've done to extract the broken set... _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
I wonder if they were already damaged before you got it... I've never seen them that fragile, it takes some force to shear the pins off the ends. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fotal
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 282 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-08-21
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fotal wrote:
Flor, that looks nasty.
Good luck with the reassembly project! _________________ Mr Scott please restrain your leaps of illogic. I have said nothing. I was merely speculating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
You can't make this damages on a good working lens even if it was cold! I have and have many pre-set lens. They are not too sensitive pieces.In my opinion this lens was cleaned and wrongly rebuild. You did turn aperture ring on an already damaged lens!! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|