View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:05 am Post subject: Nikon adapters, which for what? |
|
|
andyw wrote:
Nikon seem to do a very good selection of MF lenses and there are some 3rd party lenses (Sigma) that have the aperture ring on them.
So what adapter do i need for my NEX if I get some Nikon glass? Is there an adapter that will hold any Nikon lens regardless of age. I'm looking at 24mm f2.8D or similar or anything that will have the aperture ring so I can change aperture manually. Also the Sigma 24mm f1.8 has the aperture ring so I'm guessing it will work just like a normal MF lens?
Any help appreciated _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
you have Nikon F adapters for manual lenses (you can mount any manual lens with nikon mount that you can find that is fully manual) and Nikon G adapters for autofocus lenses from film era _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
That sounds like the perfect answer, thanks very much. ) _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
you have Nikon F adapters for manual lenses (you can mount any manual lens with nikon mount that you can find that is fully manual) and Nikon G adapters for autofocus lenses from film era |
G adapters would be for AF lenses from the digital era - the first G lenses (without a manual aperture control ring on the lens) were introduced around 2000. I can't say that I am that fond of my G adapter - the only G lens I now own is a 18-55mm VR kit lens, something I don't intend to adapt. And the adapter is far from fool proof, as its aperture control has no good cues whether it is engaged or not. If you don't have any G lenses of particular optical merits, go with the regular adapter - you'll have one error source less and even save some money over it. _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
For me I think I'll stick with the 'F' type as i really fancy a 24mm f2.8 unless anyone knows of a 21mm 24mm or 25mm faster Nikon/Nikkor lens that's well worth looking at. I really want a nice Zeiss 21 or 25mm fast lens but they cost way too much. 24mm is my preferred focal length on the NEX. _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
The 20/2.8 Ai-S is very good, but if IQ and performance at all apertures is the measure then the 24/2.8 Ai-S is better. The 24/2 Ai-S is not up to the same image quality as those two, the same applies to the pre-Ai 24/2.8 Nikkor F. None of them are [i]bad[/b], they're all great for amateur use but for full frame and large prints I think the 24/2.8 Ai-S and 20/2.8 are the only ones to consider.
You're using crop frame, so most of the problems with corners soft at wide open aperture are not affecting you. You should be fine with any of them. _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
Excellent, thanks. I have just pulled the plug on a sigma 17-35mm f2.8-4 for not much money and that has a seperate aperture ring. The add says it will Af on say a D90 but not on the D5100 etc so I'm asuming it will work with the F adapter.
The 24mm f2.8 AI-s is next no the shopping list providing it's better than the Vivitar 24mm f2.8 which I have been very happy with so far. _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Yep, it will be fine. AF has nothing to do with it (that just designates whether there's a motor in the body of the lens or not AFAIK), the fact that it has an aperture ring is the important bit for you.
One thing about using AF lenses on MF bodies...the focusing rings tend to be poor on the cheaper lenses. The Sigma 30/1.4 is awful for MF. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
Thanks. I have 'Focus Peeking' on the NEX which really helps with focus and you can get it spot on where you want it. It's a very handy and cool feature for MF. I bought the NEX C3 just for my MF lenses. _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 Posts: 1299
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
I've got the Ais 24/2.8 and I can confirm it's a great lens on a crop sensor and on film. They usually aren't cheap though. I was lucky and got mine (mint and only a couple of years old) for less than 20 pounds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyw
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 624 Location: Surrey. UK
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
andyw wrote:
Jeeze that WAS very lucky!! _________________ Andy
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Yebisu wrote: |
I've got the Ais 24/2.8 and I can confirm it's a great lens on a crop sensor and on film. They usually aren't cheap though. I was lucky and got mine (mint and only a couple of years old) for less than 20 pounds. |
Yes you were very indeed very lucky, the 24/2.8 Ai-S auctions (not BiNs) average end at about 150 (dollars or euros) on eBay, with mint ones selling for 200. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|