Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
james wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote: |
james wrote: |
The Nikkor 180/2.8 ED, the AIS but especially the AF version, are sharper, have far less CA (the AF version is superior) and isn't that much more money. |
Agreed on all points, assuming by CA you mean lateral CA. |
Yes.
ChrisLilley wrote: |
james wrote: |
The AF version focuses VERY slowly and is in desperate need of an update by Nikon, assuming they believe that there is demand. |
Nikon have released some updated fast primes recently (24/1.4, 35/1.4, 85/1.4, 200/2). In each case, the relevant zoom lens with which the prime would compete was slower (24-70/2.8, 70-200/2.. It seems that Nikon believe zooms are for everyone, consumer to pro, and that the only marked for primes is pro-level, price-not-a-major-consideration fast glass.
I doubt, therefore, whether there will be an AF-S 180/2.8 despite the fact that it would have quite a different application to the expensive and heavy 200/2. And of course if they do make one, it won't have an aperture ring and won't work on extension tubes or bellows. |
The questions is, how long can they still seriously peddle as "new", the 18 year-old 180 AFD? They can't be selling that many these days and if you're right (your reasoning is sound), they will likely discontinue it soon altogether. |