View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7610 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:18 pm Post subject: My 'new' A7RII |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Get this camera from my friend. It is much heavier than my old 5N with many more buttons and wheels. The BSI CMOS and IBIS function are very useful for slower lenses and low light photography.
Sample take with the Orthostigmat at ISO 1250, click for full resolution.
_________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
_________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
Congratulations..
They are getting cheaper (after release Mark iii), i might have consider one A7rii rather than A7ii for my nex6 update _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16667 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Congrats!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11113 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Quite a nice rig there sir! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2019 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Congratz! My A7 has broken curtain after 83000 clics . I hope they solved it on later models. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7610 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
Congratz! My A7 has broken curtain after 83000 clics . I hope they solved it on later models. |
Sony say 7RII shutter life is 500,000K. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
calvin83, can you share your experiences after half a year of usage?
Have you adjusted to the new weight/size, or it does hinder you from time to time?
I'm thinking about getting used a6500 in a year or two and continue with adapting through LT II.
But also keep one eye open to A7 series.
Another thing I'm thinking about: some "okay" lenses will begin to fall apart with this kind of resolution.
If we take 16Mp APS-C crop sensor, pixel density will scale to exactly 40Mp across the field on full frame.
If a sharpness on a crop wasn't stellar before, pulling even more of soft FOV over this kind of pixel density won't compliment the glass at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I've found with my Sony NEX 7, which has a 24.34MP sensor, that I haven't run into a lens yet that can't handle that sensor's resolution. I'm not saying it can't happen. Years ago, I owned an off-brand 28mm f/2.8 lens that couldn't handle the resolution of a good slide emulsion. So they're out there. But if you're into collecting quality lenses, this usually isn't an issue. Well, I can think of one general exception -- I have not been happy with the quality of images from a couple of 17mm f/3.5 lenses I own (both of which do a great job with film cameras) when used with either my NEX or my EOS DSLR. But this has to do with how the crop sensors handle these optics. From what I understand, this isn't an issue with FF digital cameras (I don't own an FF digital -- yet).
Wow. I hadn't checked prices on the A7Rii in quite some time. Geez, they've fallen a LOT. Almost to the point where I can afford one.
You mention that a 16MP APS-C sensor has a density equivalent to a 40MP FF sensor. So then, using a simple algebraic proportion, a 24.3MP APS-C sensor should be the equivalent to a 60.75MP FF sensor. So what this indicates to me then is that a 24.3MP sensor puts a much greater resolution requirement on a lens -- at least the central portion of it -- than a 36MP FF sensor does, yes? So far, I'm not bumping into any optical resolution ceilings with my NEX 7. Just sayin'. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Last edited by cooltouch on Sat Jun 09, 2018 6:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7610 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
It is OK for me to use it for few hours if the lens attached is not very heavy. For lightweight lenses, focusing on the A7RII is more easy than on 5N as I can hold the camera more steadily.
On APS-C mode, the size of the photo is reduced from 42MP to 18MP, which is less than the current 24MP APS-C sensor. Most of lens I tried on the NEX-5N works equally fine on my A7RII. Most of lenses I tried are sharp enough at most part of the frame, with stopping down one or two stops, on the A7RII.
Don't buy the old A7 or A7II(I have tried both A7 and A7II) if you can afford a used A7RII(A7RII is much cheaper now): the old 24MP sensor is much more inferior to the 42MP sensor. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
cooltouch, calvin83, thanks for replies.
cooltouch wrote: |
You mention that a 16MP APS-C sensor has a density equivalent to a 40MP FF sensor. So then, using a simple algebraic proportion, a 24.3MP APS-C sensor should be the equivalent to a 60.75MP FF sensor. So what this indicates to me then is that a 24.3MP sensor puts a much greater resolution requirement on a lens -- at least the central portion of it -- than a 36MP FF sensor does, yes? |
Yes.
24Mp crop sensor pulls roughly one order of magnitude more details from central portion of a lens, than film did.
Eventually, this will force more stopping down from the old lens. I'm just not sure, at what pixel density real struggle will begin.
calvin83 wrote: |
Don't buy the old A7 or A7II(I have tried both A7 and A7II) if you can afford a used A7RII(A7RII is much cheaper now): the old 24MP sensor is much more inferior to the 42MP sensor. |
Yeah, that was my assessment too.
Personally, there are several drawbacks for me: price, size, price of the native full frame lens (I'd have to abandon any plans for ultra-wide or autofocus glass)
However sensor is fantastic and will definitely beat out the crap out of of APS-C + Lens Turbo II. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|