Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

MTF, and other data, for several 28mm MF lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:34 pm    Post subject: MTF, and other data, for several 28mm MF lenses Reply with quote

[[Mods: If this information already has been posted to the forum, I sincerely apologize and please remove this thread]]

28mm prime lenses having the importance they do as we adapt MF lenses to digital cameras, I thought this might be of help to some participants here. Of special interest is the MTF data, not something I have prior seen presented so clearly. Here is a link to the opening page:

http://www.pbase.com/steephill/28mms

By clicking on the individual lenses you can bring up data for each.

For example, compare this average performing Osawa

http://www.pbase.com/steephill/image/38667687

to the slightly better rated Sigma

http://www.pbase.com/steephill/image/38667689

For anyone unfamiliar with MTF, here is an explanation:

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Modulation+Transfer+Function


Last edited by guardian on Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:53 pm; edited 2 times in total


PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is useful. Cheers. Best two 28mm lenses I have found are the Konica Hexanon 3.5/28 and Minolta Rokkor-SG 3.5/28, both are older 7 element designs and better than the later 5 element types.

Worthy mention has to go to the Pentacon 2.8/28 too, it's one of the cheapest lenses you can buy but performs very well indeed.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
This is useful. Cheers. Best two 28mm lenses I have found are the Konica Hexanon 3.5/28 and Minolta Rokkor-SG 3.5/28, both are older 7 element designs and better than the later 5 element types.

Worthy mention has to go to the Pentacon 2.8/28 too, it's one of the cheapest lenses you can buy but performs very well indeed.


A weakness of the site I posted is that it does not contain data for MF lenses with short register distances, such as the splendid Hexanon 28mm. This is, I suspect, because the author is focused on lenses suitable for the Pentax cameras which are his principal interest.

Still, I hope the site might be helpful to some individuals.

ETA

Sorry for confusion. Links in OP have now been put right.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The author also finds difference between lenses: Tokina = Hoya and Hanimex = Makinon. Which is kind of funny.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I also find differences between my Tokina RMC and my Hoya HMC even though they are supposed to be the same lens.

However, in this case Tokina is 7 elements in 6 groups, while Hoya is 7 elements in 7 groups, which raises even more questions.


PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
This is useful. Cheers. Best two 28mm lenses I have found are the Konica Hexanon 3.5/28 and Minolta Rokkor-SG 3.5/28, both are older 7 element designs and better than the later 5 element types.

Worthy mention has to go to the Pentacon 2.8/28 too, it's one of the cheapest lenses you can buy but performs very well indeed.


Ian,

What do you think about the Leica Elmarit-R 28/2.8 compared in terms of performance wide-open, color rendition, etc with the Hexanon and Rokkor? Am i wrong or these two lenses you mention are both Minolta bayonet, and not usable with EOS cameras?

Thanks,

Renato