Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Most inefficient way of taking pictures
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:04 am    Post subject: Most inefficient way of taking pictures Reply with quote

this one?

Click here to see on Ebay.de

Smile


PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1, I had one attached to my eos 1n when I got it 2nd hand, and very quickly sold it to a gent in the USA via ebay


PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Had one for my Bronica, great thing if you e=want an instant result for composition,exposure and such.Absolutely no different to 'chimping' these days.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Useful (ish)


PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Camera Lucida Wink

Everybody knows cave painters really wished for a portable cave. Laughing


PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Long before there was digital, polaroid backs were very common amongst professionals to check exposure, lighting ratios and setups. Ones for the Hasselblad 500 series can still be found on Ebay for around $100 or so.

They have little use today and are mostly for collectors I guess. I use my D700 to check exposure and lights nowadays before I commit light to film. It is cheating, I know, but the days of that old adage "film is cheap" is no longer true and nothing can tank your rep quicker than a shoot that has to be redone because you messed up the exposure.


PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, back then in film days these are useful and expensive parts!
Got one on a Nikon camera from the fleamarket, and I think I sold the polaroid back for ~200 DM - to a reseller as far as I remember. This is now only 100 Euro, but back then much money.

Marty Forscher, the inventor of these backs, seems to be a unique camera repair person.
In case I remember correct, he was "the" repair person for the Vietnam or WW2. He bought every interessting camera for the war photographers, disassembled it to the smallest part, throw all parts from one camera in a bag and shake this, and reassembled the camera.
After this process he decided which camera he could recommend for the photographers.
And he could reassemble a Leica in total darkness.
This are my memories what I read in a big war photography book about him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/nyregion/11forscher.html?_r=0


PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZoneV wrote:

Marty Forscher, the inventor of these backs, seems to be a unique camera repair person.
In case I remember correct, he was "the" repair person for the Vietnam or WW2. He bought every interessting camera for the war photographers, disassembled it to the smallest part, throw all parts from one camera in a bag and shake this, and reassembled the camera.
After this process he decided which camera he could recommend for the photographers.
And he could reassemble a Leica in total darkness.
This are my memories what I read in a big war photography book about him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/nyregion/11forscher.html?_r=0


Great story!