View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 1:39 pm Post subject: Minolta MD 24-50/4: is this normal? |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Just received this lens from Ebay but noticed something strange.
With the aperture set @ f/4, the aperture looks a little bit closed down @ the 24mm setting.
When zooming to 50mm @ f/4, the aperture is fully open. I don't see an obvious change in exposure on my camera body when I do this.
Is it possible, that the aperture is slightly closed at the 24mm setting, when the aperture ring is @ f/4? Or is there something wrong?
Here's the lens @ f/4, first @ 24mm setting, and then @ 50mm:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1213 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
I don't think there's anything wrong there. I have a couple of zooms that do the same thing, to keep the light intensity equal through-out the zoom range. I can't find any differences in what exposure my smarter camera recommends, either.
I think it's one or two of the Tamron's that do that for me.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
I don't think there's anything wrong there. I have a couple of zooms that do the same thing, to keep the light intensity equal through-out the zoom range. I can't find any differences in what exposure my smarter camera recommends, either.
I think it's one or two of the Tamron's that do that for me.
-D.S. |
Thanks for clarifying. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michelb
Joined: 24 Dec 2015 Posts: 67 Location: Montréal area,Québec, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michelb wrote:
My MD-III copy does the same as yours. _________________ Michel B
Interested in Minolta SLR's since 1971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3221 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
michelb wrote: |
My MD-III copy does the same as yours. |
Thanks, that’s reassuring! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
That is a hack to keep a constant aperture. I have several wide zooms that to that. They are actually 28/3.5-4 lenses but IQ would probably be sub standard when not closed down a bit. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11058 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
A clever albeit mechanically complicated way to get more sharpness at the wide end? Also maybe constant aperture selling point instead of saying a f/3.5-f/4 zoom? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dejan
Joined: 05 Jan 2021 Posts: 151 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
That is a hack to keep a constant aperture. I have several wide zooms that to that. They are actually 28/3.5-4 lenses but IQ would probably be sub standard when not closed down a bit. |
That is the case with 35-70mm F3.5 lens. Some even modify it to perform as F2.8 lens at 35mm, and it does perform worse that way, but I'm guessing that they did this more to avoid having a variable aperture; making the lens more "pro" or whatever. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Dejan wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
That is a hack to keep a constant aperture. I have several wide zooms that to that. They are actually 28/3.5-4 lenses but IQ would probably be sub standard when not closed down a bit. |
That is the case with 35-70mm F3.5 lens. Some even modify it to perform as F2.8 lens at 35mm, and it does perform worse that way, but I'm guessing that they did this more to avoid having a variable aperture; making the lens more "pro" or whatever. |
I was gonna do it for both macro and not macro 35-70mm Minolta 3.5, but if it only affects the wider aperture on 35mm FL, it's not really worth it I guess |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|