Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Minolta MD 135mm f2.8 Samsung NX11
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 6:20 pm    Post subject: Minolta MD 135mm f2.8 Samsung NX11 Reply with quote

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5


PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As always....thanks for sharing. Really, beauties.

Tell me, please, do the samsung's sensor work better than the nex 5n with the MD lens? I ask you because with the Nex I saw some CA.

I will buy it again.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you! I think CA is not sensor dependent , Samsung has more muted colors in default and worst camera in my opinion than NEX. I keep this NX11 due built in EVF and excellent flash system. Sometimes both offer me serious benefits vs Sony NEX-3.


PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great images
I just got a md tele rokkor 128mm f2,8 myself
Is your the 4elements/4groups or the 5/5?
I'm not sure how to tell with mine Confused


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know only mine is latest MD, I have no idea about elements Sad


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

!Karen wrote:

I just got a md tele rokkor 128mm f2,8 myself
Is your the 4elements/4groups or the 5/5?
I'm not sure how to tell with mine Confused


Very easy to find out. Just put in on a scale, maybe you have one in your kitchen. 535 gr. is the best version (4/4). Wink
It's front heavy and available in MC-X, MD I and MD II versions.

However, the other ones are not bad as well.


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
I know only mine is latest MD, I have no idea about elements Sad


The latest version would be the MD lens without "Rokkor" known as MD III.

However, the latest versions (5/5) are considerably lighter (365 and 385 gr.) and have been available in MD versions II and III.

They are almost as excellent as the previous 4/4 versions. There are hardly any visible differences in the final pictures. Only in pixel peeping mode. Wink


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great photos, Attila!


PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tb_a wrote:
Attila wrote:
I know only mine is latest MD, I have no idea about elements Sad


The latest version would be the MD lens without "Rokkor" known as MD III.

However, the latest versions (5/5) are considerably lighter (365 and 385 gr.) and have been available in MD versions II and III.

They are almost as excellent as the previous 4/4 versions. There are hardly any visible differences in the final pictures. Only in pixel peeping mode. Wink


Some minolta's users say that the 3,5/135 with 5 element (the last one) rivalized with the 4/4 2,8/135 in sharpness, contrast and low CA.

I have not the 3,5/135.


PostPosted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have 135mm f3.5 ... pretty crappy.