View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1662
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2021 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
The pics and the comments were calling my interest, so I have bought a Primotar 135 in exakta mount.
I hope to take Dreams images that with my actuall lenses, I do not.
Thanks.
I have paid u$s 38 for it.
Worth that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
papasito wrote: |
The pics and the comments were calling my interest, so I have bought a Primotar 135 in exakta mount.
I hope to take Dreams images that with my actuall lenses, I do not.
Thanks.
I have paid u$s 38 for it.
Worth that? |
Good buy. The shipping ran mine up. Like new, so well worth the price
Mine is also Exakta mount. I would have preferred M42 so I could easily use my M42 helicoid adapter. The minimum focus distance could use some help.
Spend some time finding distances, before and behind the subjects. The bokeh changes rapidly with those distances and can be creamy, funky, or overly funky. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Here's an update. This time using the Silver version.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I've also used it for portrait.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1207 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
I've also used it for portrait. |
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Woodrim, I have to take my hat off to you.
Chasing insects and children with a manual focus lens is a huge challenge.
You have done so very well.
Congratulations
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Here's an update. This time using the Silver version.
#2
#8
|
The images are all lovely, but these two are exceptional in my eyes
The bokeh in number 8 is to die for
Well done |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Thank you, Tom. As for the bugs-in-flight, you must imagine what I look like while chasing them. In all fairness, that bee was doing a lot of hovering.
As I mentioned earlier, the bokeh from the Primotar has a wide range of character. As you surely know, it is very much dependent on the combination of distances before and after the subject. Picking an interesting background is important too. I tend to like colorful and busy backgrounds when doing flowers with the Primotar. I had also suggested a helicoid to allow for closer focus but too short a distance will replace funky bokeh with just blur. It's a fun lens. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2021 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Thank you, Tom. As for the bugs-in-flight, you must imagine what I look like while chasing them. In all fairness, that bee was doing a lot of hovering.
As I mentioned earlier, the bokeh from the Primotar has a wide range of character. As you surely know, it is very much dependent on the combination of distances before and after the subject. Picking an interesting background is important too. I tend to like colorful and busy backgrounds when doing flowers with the Primotar. I had also suggested a helicoid to allow for closer focus but too short a distance will replace funky bokeh with just blur. It's a fun lens. |
Yes - and occasionally one is rewarded with a Monet rendering as in number 8
Splendid
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1662
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
papasito wrote: |
The pics and the comments were calling my interest, so I have bought a Primotar 135 in exakta mount.
I hope to take Dreams images that with my actuall lenses, I do not.
Thanks.
I have paid u$s 38 for it.
Worth that? |
Good buy. The shipping ran mine up. Like new, so well worth the price
Mine is also Exakta mount. I would have preferred M42 so I could easily use my M42 helicoid adapter. The minimum focus distance could use some help.
Spend some time finding distances, before and behind the subjects. The bokeh changes rapidly with those distances and can be creamy, funky, or overly funky. |
Mine is the black zebra version. Is it cheaper? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Old silver is usually more, right? The price I paid is not indicative of values. I think I caught others sleeping. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|