Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Mamiya Sekor 645 C 35mm f3.5
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:14 pm    Post subject: Mamiya Sekor 645 C 35mm f3.5 Reply with quote

I own first sample that lens quite long. But was unsatisfied with it. There is the story:

https://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-645-c-35mm-f3-5-haze-inside-the-lens-t84981.html


The new sample Mamiya Sekor 645 C N 35mm f3.5, which I obtained recently looks some better. However, also only quite bearable, and at the closed diaphragms.

There is photo at 11.0:



Last edited by LittleAlex on Wed Sep 25, 2024 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Mamiya Sekor 645 C 35mm f3.5 Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
I own first sample that lens quite long. But was unsatisfied with it. There is the story:

The new sample Mamiya Sekor 645 C N 35mm f3.5, which I obtained recently looks some better. However, also only quite bearable, and at the closed diaphragms.


That's why Mamiya did release the Sekor D AF 4.5/28 mm ... The old computation was good enough for film, but not for high-res meduim format sensors. I've been testing the Sekor C 3.5/35mm using the Zörk Shift adapter and my A900 / A7RII cameras (resulting in 54 MP and 95 MP images, and a stitched Sensor size of 54 x 36mm respectively). The results weren't impressive; an A7RII plus Zeiss Loxia 2.8/21mm is much better.

S


PostPosted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 1:53 am    Post subject: Re: Mamiya Sekor 645 C 35mm f3.5 Reply with quote

stevemark wrote:


That's why Mamiya did release the Sekor D AF 4.5/28 mm ...
S


Well:

If you're using the XF or DF+ with a FF back, and IQ in the corners is important, the 35LS is a great piece of glass. On a 1.3X back, I think you could get away with one of the 28's.

https://www.getdpi.com/forum/index.php?threads/mamiya-28mm-f-4-5-d-vs-mamiya-schneider-28mm-ls-f-4-5.57718/

Well, my P25 back has the 1.1X factor


PostPosted: Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: Mamiya Sekor 645 C 35mm f3.5 Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
stevemark wrote:


That's why Mamiya did release the Sekor D AF 4.5/28 mm ...
S


Well:

If you're using the XF or DF+ with a FF back, and IQ in the corners is important, the 35LS is a great piece of glass. On a 1.3X back, I think you could get away with one of the 28's.

https://www.getdpi.com/forum/index.php?threads/mamiya-28mm-f-4-5-d-vs-mamiya-schneider-28mm-ls-f-4-5.57718/


That's marketing gibberish. The person writing the above was/is running the Phase One show room for Los Angeles. He certainly prefers to sell a 35LS since the Mamiya 4.5/28mm is discontinued.

The Mamiya 4.5/28mm was designed not only for 1.3x and 1.1x backs, but for film (1.0x) as well:
https://lens-db.com/mamiya-sekor-d-af-28mm-f45-aspherical-2007/

S


PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/11.0 15,0 s; ISO 400

Tripod



PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

F/5.6 1/30 с; ISO 200



PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/8.0 1/125 с; ISO 200




PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/3.4 1/125 с; ISO 200



PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/11.0 1/125 с; ISO 200



PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/8.0 1/45 s; ISO 200



PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
Phase One 645 DF+ P25 back

f/3.4 1/125 с; ISO 200



That's a really good image - well composed, and ... black and white!!

S


PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2024 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been putting together a Mamiya 645 lens set and I have been slow to buy the 35/3.5 due to its lackluster reputation. These images look good and have convinved me to get one. I don't know why they sell for more than the Pentax 645 35/3.5 when everyone says the Pentax version is better, but that's the way it is.


PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2024 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Noritar wrote:
convinved me to get one. .


But be very careful with the back optical element. There is the story again:

https://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-645-c-35mm-f3-5-haze-inside-the-lens-t84981.html


PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2024 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Noritar wrote:
its lackluster reputation. .


Well, lens is so-so, and quite useful. Especially at 8-11 diaphragm.

Of course there are alternatives, like Mamiya Sekor AF 28mm f/4.5 D ASPH, or even Phase One 35mm f3.5 LS Blue Ring, but prices are really raving, and I am not completely certain that differences in quality would justify the difference in price. Especially with the P25 back, which I use.


PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2024 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
Noritar wrote:
convinved me to get one. .


But be very careful with the back optical element. There is the story again:

https://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-645-c-35mm-f3-5-haze-inside-the-lens-t84981.html


That is good to know. Thanks for that info!


PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2024 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
Noritar wrote:
its lackluster reputation. .


Well, lens is so-so, and quite useful. Especially at 8-11 diaphragm.

Of course there are alternatives, like Mamiya Sekor AF 28mm f/4.5 D ASPH, or even Phase One 35mm f3.5 LS Blue Ring, but prices are really raving, and I am not completely certain that differences in quality would justify the difference in price. Especially with the P25 back, which I use.


I want it primarily for video. I believe it will be good for that purpose even if it's not the sharpest option.


PostPosted: Sat Sep 28, 2024 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemark wrote:
well composed, and ... black and white!!

S


f/11.0 1/45 s; ISO 200