View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:23 pm Post subject: Mamiya Macro Sekor 60mm f2.8 - experiences? |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I just bought this lens, it's the same as the Tomioka 60mm 1:1 macro, isn't it?
Experiences are welcome, info, samples etc. _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i have the same lens under the yashinon brand
here is the thread i posted some samples with it
http://forum.mflenses.com/testing-my-lenses-part-4-yashinon-tomioka-60mm-2-8-t28037,highlight,%2Btesting+%2Blenses.html _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hari
Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Posts: 1790
Expire: 2015-05-27
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hari wrote:
an older thread ->
http://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-60mm-f2-8-11-m42-macro-t29377.html _________________
Analogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85
Digital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240
SLR: Leica R3 electronic, Canon AE1P
DSLR: Canon 5D MK2
M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. + Leica 24/f3.8 ASPH + Leica 28/f2 ASPH. + Leica 35/f1.4 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. + Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 90/f2 E55 + Leica 90/f2.8 + Leica APO 135/f3.4
Leica R mount Lenses: Leica-R 60/2.8 E55 + Leica-R 80/1.4 E67 + Leica-R 180/4
EF mount Lenses: Canon 50/1.8 II
M42 mount Lenses: Too many
My pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dementedjesus/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Haley (Luna) has that lens too and she did yome great macro shots with it... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Thanks guys, appreciate it!
Pictures looks good from it in my eyes, are you happy with it's performance?
And I just saw this
Planar S ?!? Has Zeiss something to do with this lens? _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
Thanks guys, appreciate it!
Pictures looks good from it in my eyes, are you happy with it's performance?
And I just saw this
Planar S ?!? Has Zeiss something to do with this lens? |
well, according to this site:
http://olypedia.de/Vivitar_1:2,8/55_mm_MC_Macro#Brennweite_135_mm
both were made by Tomioka, but what makes me sceptical is that photos of Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar 1:2,8/60 mm S were supplied by the seller you pointed to
here is the optical scheme for yashinon 60mm/2.8:
here is the optical scheme for makro-planar 60mm/2.8 S:
_________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Aren't the aperture blades of this lens always in view, even wide open? I would consider that a downside. Otherwise it seems to be a nice lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
Aren't the aperture blades of this lens always in view, even wide open? I would consider that a downside. Otherwise it seems to be a nice lens. |
why would that be a downside?
if i remember correctly (i'm at work right now , but i'll check it when i get home) blades are visible when looking at the front glass element, i'm not sure if they are visible from the rear _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
AhamB wrote: |
Aren't the aperture blades of this lens always in view, even wide open? I would consider that a downside. Otherwise it seems to be a nice lens. |
why would that be a downside?
if i remember correctly (i'm at work right now , but i'll check it when i get home) blades are visible when looking at the front glass element, i'm not sure if they are visible from the rear |
It is visible from the front. I think it is also visible at back but I cannot check it as it is sold. The apeture is in hexagonal shape in every aperture. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
AhamB wrote: |
Aren't the aperture blades of this lens always in view, even wide open? I would consider that a downside. Otherwise it seems to be a nice lens. |
why would that be a downside? |
Obviously because you would always get hexagon shapes in the bokeh (with OOF highlights), even with the lens wide open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
WolverineX wrote: |
AhamB wrote: |
Aren't the aperture blades of this lens always in view, even wide open? I would consider that a downside. Otherwise it seems to be a nice lens. |
why would that be a downside? |
Obviously because you would always get hexagon shapes in the bokeh (with OOF highlights), even with the lens wide open. |
that's a question of individual taste
i checked and yes the blades are visible from the rear while wide open, and they form hexagon with rounded corners, almost circle but not quite
anyway i use olympus e520 so i do believe that the fact that blades are visible doesn't show in photos, but i'll have to check to be sure _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
Just picked this lens up for 20$ (I could have probably gotten it for 10$ even), and was wondering how much it is worth. Did an ebay search for both the Yashinon and Yashica version and they're around 350$... (BIN). WOW!
I know BIN's are mostly way too high, but is this somewhat in the right direction, or?
I've got 5 batteries, but they all ran out (aaargh!) and could only take a couple shots till my last one depleted, but so far it looks GREAT. It's my first macro lens and I think everything people say about the amazing sharpness of macro lenses is 100% true! _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
TijmenDal wrote: |
Just picked this lens up for 20$ (I could have probably gotten it for 10$ even), and was wondering how much it is worth. Did an ebay search for both the Yashinon and Yashica version and they're around 350$... (BIN). WOW!
I know BIN's are mostly way too high, but is this somewhat in the right direction, or?
I've got 5 batteries, but they all ran out (aaargh!) and could only take a couple shots till my last one depleted, but so far it looks GREAT. It's my first macro lens and I think everything people say about the amazing sharpness of macro lenses is 100% true! |
for 20$ you got the steal. this lens has hype because it was made by tomioka and that's why the price is usually high
i've got it under yashinon name:
http://forum.mflenses.com/testing-my-lenses-part-4-yashinon-tomioka-60mm-2-8-t28037,highlight,%2Btesting+%2Blenses.html _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
TijmenDal wrote: |
Just picked this lens up for 20$ (I could have probably gotten it for 10$ even), and was wondering how much it is worth. Did an ebay search for both the Yashinon and Yashica version and they're around 350$... (BIN). WOW!
I know BIN's are mostly way too high, but is this somewhat in the right direction, or?
I've got 5 batteries, but they all ran out (aaargh!) and could only take a couple shots till my last one depleted, but so far it looks GREAT. It's my first macro lens and I think everything people say about the amazing sharpness of macro lenses is 100% true! |
for 20$ you got the steal. this lens has hype because it was made by tomioka and that's why the price is usually high
i've got it under yashinon name:
http://forum.mflenses.com/testing-my-lenses-part-4-yashinon-tomioka-60mm-2-8-t28037,highlight,%2Btesting+%2Blenses.html |
+1 Congratz! _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
Oh, it's an amazing lens as far as I can tell!
But what am I looking at in terms of resale value?
The ones at 395 and 450$ seem a little steep, but it's an AMAZING piece of glass I'm sure.
I don't know if I can justify keeping it though, if resale value is that high. I would then rather sell it and get a 24mm (probably Olympus. I've been wanting that lens for at last a year now or 135mm SMC f/2.5 vII).
Oh well, I've only taken a couple shots with it so far, maybe I'll fall in love with it. Can't wait till my battery is recharged, ha! _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
TijmenDal wrote: |
Oh, it's an amazing lens as far as I can tell!
But what am I looking at in terms of resale value?
The ones at 395 and 450$ seem a little steep, but it's an AMAZING piece of glass I'm sure.
I don't know if I can justify keeping it though, if resale value is that high. I would then rather sell it and get a 24mm (probably Olympus. I've been wanting that lens for at last a year now or 135mm SMC f/2.5 vII).
Oh well, I've only taken a couple shots with it so far, maybe I'll fall in love with it. Can't wait till my battery is recharged, ha! |
I paid close to $200 for mine, and that was one of the cheaper I saw _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i payed 295$ for mine, in november of 2009. _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
i payed 295$ for mine, in november of 2009. |
WOW!
I could sell it with 250-300$ profit... Not too bad. God that makes me happy!
First I'm going to have to play around with it some more though. Uploading my pictures from today right now. It even looked good on my crappy 5Dc screen. Can't wait to see what they look like on a big one! _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ducdao
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 288 Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
ducdao wrote:
TijmenDal wrote: |
WolverineX wrote: |
i payed 295$ for mine, in november of 2009. |
WOW!
I could sell it with 250-300$ profit... Not too bad. God that makes me happy!
First I'm going to have to play around with it some more though. Uploading my pictures from today right now. It even looked good on my crappy 5Dc screen. Can't wait to see what they look like on a big one! |
Go out and take pictures with it and I bet you will keep the lens. Yes, it's a great lens. The one with the Tomioka mentioned on the front goes for even more than that.
I have two copies, one in mint condition the other has few cosmetics issues but I would never sell them. _________________ Duc
Pentax K100D/K10D/K20D/K-x/K-7 | DA15/ 35/40/70 Limited | DA10-17 | DA14 | DA* 50-135
Takumar: 24/3.5 | 28/3.5 | 35/2 | 35/2.3 | 35/3.5 | 50/1.4 | 55/1.8 | 85/1.8 | 85/1.9 | 105f2.8 | 135/2.5 | 135/3.5 | 150/4 | 200/4 | 300/4
Pentax: K20/4 | M20/4 | M28/3.5 | K30/2.8 | K35/3.5 | M50/1.4 | M50/1.7 | K50/1.2 | K50/1.4 | K55/1.8 | A50/1.4 | M85/2 | M100/2.8 | K105/2.8 | M100/f4 | M135/3.5 | K135/2.5 | M150/4 | M200/4 | M300/4
M42: Too many to list
Stock Images
My Flickr: Sunny Skye |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
ducdao wrote: |
TijmenDal wrote: |
WolverineX wrote: |
i payed 295$ for mine, in november of 2009. |
WOW!
I could sell it with 250-300$ profit... Not too bad. God that makes me happy!
First I'm going to have to play around with it some more though. Uploading my pictures from today right now. It even looked good on my crappy 5Dc screen. Can't wait to see what they look like on a big one! |
Go out and take pictures with it and I bet you will keep the lens. Yes, it's a great lens. The one with the Tomioka mentioned on the front goes for even more than that.
I have two copies, one in mint condition the other has few cosmetics issues but I would never sell them. |
You might be right. I'm pretty sure I'm in love with this lens. Renders like nothing I ever shot before. Or should I say: renders better than anything I've ever shot. Such a great lens.
Not too shabby, right? Flickr takes away a great deal of the quality, but you still see how awesome it is. As I'm writing this, my heart is just filling with joy and happiness. I'm in loooove
[42/365] - The last straw by TijmenDal _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
+1, I would also have kept this lens.
You can get a good 135mm f/2.8 for $10 instead of the 135mm SMC lens and you probably can't see much difference on the results, but you can't get a decent 1:1 macro for less than $2-300
And if 28mm is enough, there would be lots of choices for cheap or cheaper than a 24mm.
Be careful, LBA is knocking on your door _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elliott
Joined: 16 May 2011 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
elliott wrote:
I gave $150 for mine and a Bushnell 35mm f2.8 (Tokina made, same as the Vivitar) and Suntar 135mm f2.8 were included in the deal. I considered it a really good deal and wouldn't sell the Mamiya for even double what I paid. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
+1, I would also have kept this lens.
You can get a good 135mm f/2.8 for $10 instead of the 135mm SMC lens and you probably can't see much difference on the results, but you can't get a decent 1:1 macro for less than $2-300
And if 28mm is enough, there would be lots of choices for cheap or cheaper than a 24mm.
Be careful, LBA is knocking on your door |
I guess you're right, haha. I got a CZJ 135mm f/3.5 as my main 135mm, but I'd like the speed of the SMC. That's mostly it I think.
And I bought the Olympus 24mm yesterday. Finally! After looking for a decently priced one for a year, I finally found one (110$ for the MC version). _________________ //Tijmen
http://cargocollective.com/tijmendal |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
I'm thinking of buying one of those Mamiya 60mm macros too. Its not really a bargain bur reasonably priced.
from what i read here it's a decent macro lens - so let see if i will get it and i will report my findings _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
I bought one some months ago (actually traded with some other lenses) and I'm really liking it, not only for macro use. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|