| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 576
Location: Zurich
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
wolan wrote:
I live in beautiful Zurich, Switzerland.
Cheers.
| woodrim wrote: |
| wolan: Where are you located? |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Yes you do, don't you!!! I was wondering because I was going to offer a Orestor for reasonable$.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 576
Location: Zurich
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolan wrote:
Thanks. I have bought the ORESTON lens 1,8 / 50.
I have seen very nice pictures on fickr so I decide to have one 
| woodrim wrote: |
| Yes you do, don't you!!! I was wondering because I was going to offer a Orestor for reasonable$. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
| wolan wrote: |
Thanks. I have bought the ORESTON lens 1,8 / 50.
I have seen very nice pictures on fickr so I decide to have one
| woodrim wrote: |
| Yes you do, don't you!!! I was wondering because I was going to offer a Orestor for reasonable$. |
|
One of my favorites. You'll enjoy it. I was offering Orestor.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 1300
Location: Idaho, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
Here's some serious bang for buck:
Rich by unoh7, on Flickr
Canon FL 50/1.2 WO on A7.mod
I paid 125 USD from Keh in 2010, when prices were higher than today.
This lens replaced the older FL 55/1.2 with a complete redesign, and can keep pace with any superspeed today, except maybe the slightly expensive Leica .95
_________________
Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 576
Location: Zurich
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
wolan wrote:
| Quote: |
| ...except maybe the slightly expensive Leica .95 |
I have the Nikkor 50mm f1.2 AIs, which I love and which by the way produces a nice looking bokeh.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 147
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
?? In other threads you've said this shot was taken with the FL 55mm 1.2? Maybe that's the lens you actually mean, as it replaced the FL 58mm 1.2.
Edit: The Flickr link also is tagged 55/1.2, so I'm sure its just a mix-up...
| uhoh7 wrote: |
Here's some serious bang for buck:
Rich by unoh7, on Flickr
Canon FL 50/1.2 WO on A7.mod
I paid 125 USD from Keh in 2010, when prices were higher than today.
This lens replaced the older FL 55/1.2 with a complete redesign, and can keep pace with any superspeed today, except maybe the slightly expensive Leica .95 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 576
Location: Zurich
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolan wrote:
I bought the SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4
Not sure whether it is considered a bokeh monster, but the results I get with a Nikon D800 a very pleasant:
Cheers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
