View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
newst wrote: |
There are various Flektogon configurations. I have a 1975 zebra version with a 5 blade iris and a 1955 aluminum tube version with a 12 blade iris. Both good lenses but the bokeh is nicer with the older lens. |
Those shots were taken partially stopped down - of course wide open would produce circles. Few 35mm have round irises stopped down. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
The Rokkor MD W 35 2.8 is a sharp across the frame on FF. I suppose that it draws no attention because it is common , "slow" and cheap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
notko
Joined: 22 Apr 2014 Posts: 54 Location: Uppsala, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
notko wrote:
memetph wrote: |
The Rokkor MD W 35 2.8 is a sharp across the frame on FF. I suppose that it draws no attention because it is common , "slow" and cheap. |
+1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
If we continue this thread, we might come to a conclusion that the F2.8 primes from well known brands are good enough. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
Well , it is not the case.I tested some of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Aanything wrote: |
Your second picture is the first generation of Minolta MC series, while the first refers to a later series. However. optical formula should be the same, as the two letters after "Rokkor" in the name indicate number of groups/elements (in this case, 6/.
Later series usually have better coatings, but the first MC generation is my favourite for look/build quality. |
Actually the second lens is MCII not MCI, and the first picture is MCX
http://minolta.eazypix.de/lenses/index.html The differences are easy to see, scroll to the bottom.
The optics are all the same, only updated coatings will be the main difference, other than the body obviously. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
I recognise that picture…
The answer is definitely yes… at least for my copy of the lens (6 blade f2.4 version); stop down more or less and the shape goes away.
Perhaps someone else can confirm that their copy does the same? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanylapep
Joined: 03 Jan 2014 Posts: 312
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vanylapep wrote:
The Topcor looks interesting, even if it's "slow" at 2.8. I actually prefer fast, but it's not mandatory. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
If you want to shoot some landscapes with a FF camera, you should check carefuly that the lens you choose performs well in the corners on such a camera.
You could have some disappointments even stopped down. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Remember a 35mm on A6000 has different view on A7. The focus throw will be also critical if you will change the focus frequently. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I really liked my FD SSC 24/2.8 on my NEX-7, and for a wide angle, I liked my OM 21/3.5 _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrano
Joined: 15 Feb 2013 Posts: 857 Location: UK
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
cyrano wrote:
A cheap as chips Canon 35 2.8! _________________ A whole bunch of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Vivitar 35mm f1.9 _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
My favourite 35 is the Canon FD 35/2.8 Tilt/Shift _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|