Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Lens you would rush to buy if...
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rick1779 wrote:
Minolta AF 85/1.4
Minolta AF 20/2.8


A very good choice. Especially the 85/1.4 is a real gem. I simply adore this lens.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gardener wrote:
visualopsins wrote:
Gardener wrote:
I already spend well over a $1000 a month on lenses.


Shocked wondering about focus? How long? Can you give us overview/survey of "collection"?


Focus? It's shifting - for example, I used to be heavily into Minolta, but then I sold most of it. There's still 50/1.4's and 28/2.8's (all of them), 35/1.8, 24/2.8, 58/1.2, 85/1.7, a few 100/2.5's, and may be something else on the long side. I used to have a huge macro collection, but ever since I got a hold of 100/2.8 L my interest in those waned - so gone are Bokinas, Kirons, Tamrons, Vivitars and their cousins (real macros and close focus lenses) and almost all brand name macros I used to own. I then got into Canon and picked up a decent set and that's what I shoot most of the time now when I shoot mirrorless. I also have a solid collection of manual nikkors for my Nikon cameras, although there's nothing outrageously expensive there. But significant portion of my buying is just trying new lenses, like the time I got interested in fast Soligors and got most of them. I played with them for a while and then they were gone. So, stuff comes and stuff goes.

wolan wrote:
Holy cow! Is this a case of acute GAS?


Some of it is GAS, sure, as the net total of the lenses I own increases, but much of it is bought, tried and passed along. Like a few weeks back, when I saw a pile of stuff that contained an uncommon 21mm lens. I have no real interest in vintage ultrawides, but when ever I will get a chance at another one? For $200 below its going price? So, I will play with it for a while, probably run it against a few similar lenses I do have and then the whole set will be converted into something else - may be a7II or high end m43, if I ever decide which way I lean.


Thanks. The fact you also resell a significant number each month makes the $1000 figure less shocking, because that much money would buy some really exellent high-end glass!


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

visualopsins wrote:
Thanks. The fact you also resell a significant number each month makes the $1000 figure less shocking, because that much money would buy some really exellent high-end glass!


I may be crazy with the amount of gear I have on hand, but not with the balance sheet. As to the really expensive stuff, sure, I have some, but I believe a lens like that should serve a purpose. Like, can I swing a Planar 85/1.2 or 85mm Otus? Yes, most likely. But what's the point of doing it if I can't make my kids sit straight in front of the cameras for even a minute?


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M (III)
Mitakon Zhongyi Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tb_a wrote:
Rick1779 wrote:
Minolta AF 85/1.4
Minolta AF 20/2.8


A very good choice. Especially the 85/1.4 is a real gem. I simply adore this lens.


It would be great with my "new" α7

Laugh 1



PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rick1779 wrote:
tb_a wrote:
Rick1779 wrote:
Minolta AF 85/1.4
Minolta AF 20/2.8


A very good choice. Especially the 85/1.4 is a real gem. I simply adore this lens.


It would be great with my "new" α7


A great camera. Congratulations. I have it as well. Wink


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tb_a wrote:
Rick1779 wrote:
tb_a wrote:
Rick1779 wrote:
Minolta AF 85/1.4
Minolta AF 20/2.8


A very good choice. Especially the 85/1.4 is a real gem. I simply adore this lens.


It would be great with my "new" α7


A great camera. Congratulations. I have it as well. Wink


I'm in love with it Tuzki with lens


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd love the Minolta AF 1.4/85 and 2.8/20 for my a850.

Coincidentally, I just bought two Sigma AF lenses for my a850 that are pretty good alternatives for the price - a 2.8/90 macro and a 3.5/18, they cost me under 100ukp for the pair.

The 2.8/90 is great, lovely bokeh, sharp as a tack, very little CA, if you see one, it's well worth grabbing.



The 3.5/18 is pretty good too, it has a fair bit of barrel distortion and vignetting, but both are very easily corrected in photoshop, it also has 2-3px purple fringing on the edges, but again, that is easily corrected. Overall, it's a good lens, but I bought it as a stopgap until I find something better.

I haven't done anything to correct the distortion or vignetting here, just a quick test shot:


100% crop, I forget what aperture, f5.6 I think, it's certainly sharp in the central region:


PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila's Helios 40 with red P to go with my 44 red P Edit: looks like it's been sold.
CV 125 APO Macro
CV 65/2 APO Macro (NEW)
CV 40/1.2 (NEW)
SMC Pentax K 85/1.8 & 28/3.5
CZJ 75/1.5 thin
Leica M 50/2 no focus tab
Orestor 100/2.8


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only expensive mf lens that I can think of right now that I wish I had is the Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical. But I might not be successful finding one for "only" $1000 anymore.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cooltouch wrote:
The only expensive mf lens that I can think of right now that I wish I had is the Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical. But I might not be successful finding one for "only" $1000 anymore.


this lens is not sooo expensive , or i'm missing something Wink

http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Canon-FD-SSC-55mm-f1-2-Aspherical-/152585951994?hash=item2386d4dafa:g:pOYAAOSws5pZNG0C

what the difference between this two lenses ?
http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Canon-FD-55mm-f-1-2-S-S-C-Aspherical-78064-/272739797882?hash=item3f808f0b7a:g:-hIAAOSwwzhZRnMP

http://www.ebay.fr/itm/CANON-FD-SSC-S-S-C-AL-1-2-55-55-55mm-F1-2-chrom-chrome-ring-Aspherical-type-1-/311903542547?hash=item489ee65d13:g:D5cAAOSwgyxWWAwL

10 times the price ^^^ or he smoke something


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, first of all, because I don't speak french, I wasn't able to puzzle out how to load the concluded auction in your first link. But the lenses in the second and third link I was able to view. I dunno about 5000 Euros for that lens. It is an early FD because it has the chrome bayonet ring in front. It shows "AL" instead of "Aspherical" and has a gold ring. Neither of these have I seen before. So I guess it must be a very rare lens. But 5000 Euros? Yeah, I think he's smoking something.

BTW, I wish that 598 Euro price could be found on US eBay. I took a look there earlier and found several of these lenses. They ranged in prices from about $1,000 to over $1,400. Whew. About a year ago, they were selling for about $600. So I think these prices involve a considerable amount of wishful thinking. But I dunno -- I haven't checked any closed auctions yet, so maybe they've increased that much. But if that's the case, I'm thinking I can probably buy a nFD 50mm f/1.2 L for less.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a f1.1 50mm by Kamlan that is very cheap and might be a viable alternative for APS-C users:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Kamlan-50mm-F1-1-APS-C-Large-Aperture-Manual-Focus-Lens-for-Sony-E-Mount/232287297187?_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851&_trkparms=aid%3D555018%26algo%3DPL.SIM%26ao%3D2%26asc%3D43781%26meid%3Dde45ae11f8ec44f781baec64d3aa3ce1%26pid%3D100005%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D6%26mehot%3Dpp%26sd%3D371951827004


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cooltouch wrote:
The only expensive mf lens that I can think of right now that I wish I had is the Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical. But I might not be successful finding one for "only" $1000 anymore.


Recently an auction here in Switzerland which contained both the FD 1.2/55mm Asph and the FD 1.2/85mm Asph was ending for about CHF 850.--.

Stephan


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

10 times the price ^^^ or he smoke something


besides weed


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@cooltouch

It could be real, and frankly, if you have a super-rare lens like that it may make sense to hold out and wait for a stupid rich collector. It also makes sense on another level - purposely overpricing it drives the traffic to his store.