View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Quite interesting discussion on dpreview: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3486063
To cut to the chase, OP's conclusions.
Quote: |
Pros:
- almost 1 stop gain is real, except for cases when a lens has a heavy vignetting
- a slight increase in central resolution. I didn't notice any increase with very sharp lenses, but some increase in soft ones when fully open
- you get (almost) FOV of the FF lenses back, no need to do multiplication, wide angle is back
- it's shorter than a dumb adapter
- it provides a good seal and protection from dust
Cons:
- the biggest problem so far is the softening of the corners. Many FF lenses are soft in the corners already, and focal reducer makes it even worse than on FF camera. Some FF lenses that worked great with a crop sensor showed very noticeable corner softening. In real life shooting, it may or may not be an issue. I noticed most affected lenses are on the short end: 24-28mm. So I wouldn't recommend focal reducer for wide landscape shots, chances are the corners will be visibly soft. The longer lenses behave better and in real life shooting the corners are OOF anyway, so you wouldn't notice it.
- the blue spot caused by the reflections in the adapter, which mostly affects smaller apertures and longer FLs. After a week of shooting I've found only a handful of pictures that had to a various degree visible blue spot in the center.
- increased vignetting: I've only seen strong vignetting on 24mm lenses when fully open. The vignetting goes away at longer FLs and smaller apertures. I took hundreds of pictures by now and I don't think it's a big problem with the lenses I have.
- the gain in speed might be smaller than you think it is. Many zooms have variable aperture. For example, when you take a picture at 24mm without a focal reducer, the lens can be f/3.5, but when you take the same picture with the same zoom with the same FOV at 33mm the lens can be f/4. So you get 1.48x increase in speed, not the 2x you might expect.
- focal reducer is heavier than a dumb adapter.
- two adapters I tried had very tight mount on the lens side, I'm afraid if I leave adapter on a lens for a prolonged time it can bind and will be difficult to remove. |
Another review:
http://gtbarnes.com/2013/05/16/nex-lens-turbo-speed-booster-initial-impressions-samples/
Big_is has FD and some other versions for $190 on ebay. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/
Last edited by fermy on Mon May 20, 2013 10:23 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1055 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Very useful conclusions fermy.
From a pragmatic point of view I understand from your post that:
- it is of limited use in landscape photography, particularly with wide lenses.
- very useful in portrait, street photography, close-up or whenever a normal or medium tele-lens is needed, especially in low light.
- useful with old normal and short tele-lenses as it may slightly increase the resolution.
Have you tested it with lenses in 135-150 mm range? How it behaves with them?
Theoretically they will become ~95-105 mm with a 2x increase in speed and focusing closer - nice as long portrait and close-up lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
The conclusions are not mine, they are from OP in the dpreview thread. I literally copied the text from dpreview, so "I" that you see in conclusions does not refer to me. I'll edit my previous post to make it clearer.
The way I read those conclusions, the gadget is not useless the way glass mount adapters are, but it does not transform your NEX into FF for free, there are penalties. The landscape on gtbarnes.com looks actually decent, so perhaps corner degradation is just a lens weakness, I didn't read the dpreview thread very carefully.
Personally, I am kind of on the fence if I really need that FF look so much, it's tempting to use my FD 24 f2 without crop factor, but other than that I tend to favor normal to tele range. So I would rather wait for further reviews and for the prices to come down a bit more. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Looks like a very useful accessory for many situations.
A pity they can't be made for DSLR bodies. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewStuff
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 847 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NewStuff wrote:
I still really want one of these for underground. It's can't give any worse IQ when using it with a 24mm than the cheap nasty 0.45 WA screw-on I currently use.
I'll wait until someone from here has a look-see at it, it's not exactly pocket change to throw around. _________________ Too many to list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
NewStuff wrote: |
I still really want one of these for underground. It's can't give any worse IQ when using it with a 24mm than the cheap nasty 0.45 WA screw-on I currently use.
I'll wait until someone from here has a look-see at it, it's not exactly pocket change to throw around. |
I will buy one as soon as an Minolta MD or better Sony AF occurs on Ebay _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
MD is already on ebay, same $190. Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_x_vision
Joined: 28 Feb 2013 Posts: 19
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
$190 is a fair price consider consider the retail price is about $150 in China. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robau
Joined: 01 Mar 2012 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
robau wrote:
anybody knows wheter there is a Konica AR or Olympus OM Lens Turbo in the makes? Didn´t get a replay... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robau
Joined: 01 Mar 2012 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
robau wrote:
now I have answers:
Metabones: "We will consider to develop a konica adapter at next half-year…"
didn´t ask about OM
Mitakon :"We do not plan to do it.
Thank you so much."
concerning Konica/OM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
robau wrote: |
now I have answers:
Metabones: "We will consider to develop a konica adapter at next half-year…"
didn´t ask about OM
Mitakon :"We do not plan to do it.
Thank you so much."
concerning Konica/OM |
The lens turbo I want should be for Pentax K, M42 and possibly Olympus OM lenses. I'll get the Pentax K lens turbo, stack the M42>K adapter for the M42 and convert the mount of the Zuikos I want to use with the lens turbo to Pentax K which is easy and will be fun to do: http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=8570
as it looks the mount on the lens turbo is easily removable, if one wanted to have a lens turbo for Zuikos only I imagine that changing the mount on the lens turbo from Pentax K to OM should be very easy.
however i expect that it won't take long before a OM lens turbo will be available _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Roxsen and big_is have them for £125. I'm saving up for an MD one.
They have Pentax K, Nikon Ai, Canon FD and Minolta MD _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I just like to add that I have ordered my LensTurbo directly from "MXcamera", because the only EBAY seller that offered the one I needed was a seller that I had some bad experiences with before!
MXcamera was great! Very pleasant communication and excellent service.
Although their online shop did not work properly, I was able to order everything via direct and personal EMail communication.
They were always willing to help and inform me even when I had problems with the German shipping company (DHL Express)! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de
Last edited by LucisPictor on Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 544 Location: Germany / Cologne
|
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
timo832000 wrote:
I got a PK lens turbo as birthday present. During the last weeks I have used it with several lenses, not all of them performed well.
Some suffer from heavy field curvature (as told by many others).
I reallly enjoy using the LT for low light portrait works with nearly all lenses but the following perform best:
Leitz Summicron-R 2/90 (leitaxed) - delivers a great Bokeh
Leitz Elmarit-R 2.8/135 (leitaxed) - sharper than without LT! focused to infinity it is sharp until the corners @ F5,6
SMC Pentax M 1,4/50 - performs really well, field curvature seems be be less pronunced than on Pentax 1,7/50 and Leitz 2/50
Those three are of "longer" focal length, all of them get very sharp across the entire frame stopped down and all of them got a big last lens element. Is it possible that the diameter of the last element of the lens is a critical factor for low field curvature with the LT or ist it just random rubbish connceived by me?
Timo _________________ I love Leica ! But I need Pentax |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bille
Joined: 03 Jan 2013 Posts: 381
|
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bille wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
however i expect that it won't take long before a OM lens turbo will be available |
Or not, with the sony a7 / a7R coming in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogtag
Joined: 27 Jul 2013 Posts: 164 Location: Holland del norte
|
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dogtag wrote:
robau wrote: |
anybody knows wheter there is a Konica AR or Olympus OM Lens Turbo in the makes? Didn´t get a replay... |
Been waiting a long time but the wait is over now, got a a7 _________________ Konica AR fan
Konica AR, 135/2.5 135/3.2 135/3.5 100/2.8 85/1.8 55/3.5-macro 57/1.2 57/1.4 50/1.4 52/1.8 50/1.7(3x) 40/1.8 35/2.8 35/2 28/1.8 24/2.8
Missing UC 15mm and 21mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|