View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sonyrokkor
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:57 pm Post subject: Konica auto S with 5 elements lens? |
|
|
sonyrokkor wrote:
It¡s difficult to beleave. Mistake?
Read, please. First page
http://www.cameramanuals.org/konica/konica_auto_s.pdf
What's your experience? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Certainly no this kind of basic mistake in a factory manual, excellent camera. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonyrokkor
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sonyrokkor wrote:
The lens was very apreciate by Roger Hicks and his articles in shutterbug.
I Thought that this was a six elements lens, like the newers konicas RF lenses.
But a five elements one. Nice to try. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
sonyrokkor wrote: |
The lens was very apreciate by Roger Hicks and his articles in shutterbug.
I Thought that this was a six elements lens, like the newers konicas RF lenses.
But a five elements one. Nice to try. |
How many elements a bit 'gymic' I had Auto S3 with six element produce far worst result with a Tessar with 4 elements or Konica C35 which has I don't know how many elements have. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonyrokkor
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sonyrokkor wrote:
Well Attila, A first "maxima" from the experience said that less elemenst, in the same focal lenght should means that the lens has less IQ at the corners and, perhaps, better contrast.
By the way, the wide aperture of F/1,9 should claim for 6 elements, as almost all F/2 normals lenses have.
From there, my curiosity.
You could not know how much elements have your konica 35 or the tessar lenses, but they have what they have, independently if we know that or no, and produce images by their schame and not by our knowledge.
Both lens =tessar and hexanon you have= have the same design. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|