View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
scsambrook wrote: |
Time to stop procrastinating and buy that mirrorless camera As for the Switar, if the moisture's still there it's telling you that the lens really needs to be opened up and the issue dealt with. It really is too good a lens to leave as a paperweight. Good luck with it ! |
You are absolutely right my friend! I had the other one as paperweight basically, but this one is too nice to not be used.
Especially since earlier today I scored a Canon 50mm f/0.95 for $500
Now I kind of really regret selling my Prominent Nokton I got for $250, but it seems I might be able to fund a mirrorless with the profits off that alone. It will be nice to not have to restict myself to which lenses to acquire, and I've been meaning to get a FF too. Maybe pet 2 birds with one hand.
Thank you for the luck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
Re; moisture, I recommend getting a bunch of silica gel packets and sealing the lens (zip lock bag?) with them in a warm place (heatiing pad?) for several days/ weeks and just see where you are at. I'm not sure how hard those are to open but unless you are a skilled tinkerer its easy to damage these old lenses and ruin their collector value (trust me, I know from personal experience!) Not sure what those are worth but if really expensive send it in for CLA by professional. I live in western Oregon where winters are cool and very wet so to prevent fungus I seal my lenses in tea tins or zip locks with those silica gel packets. |
Thank you so much! I appreciate some direct advice every once in a while on here. I have immediately stored it safely in a ziplock bag with a huge silica bag. I wish I had known That before.
You are right in regard to opening her up. i doubt the haze will remain strong enough to warrant that, as I would rather have a lens with minor edge haze that hasn't been opened up, than one that has been. Because like I said, there is no other reason to open the lens. It is very clean.
And I appreciate the rest of the input! To be honest, I am not that informed on what makes a lens APO or what that does, so it's made for some good research. I can't wait to acquire a mirrorless to try it out.
I do not envy my task of figuring out which purchase to make in that regard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:32 pm Post subject: Matter of degrees |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
Some Kinoptiks also laid claim to such superior colour correction.
As with all optical devices, there is a range of deviation around the exact frequencies corrected for . Some current manufacturers use wording more loosely than others. Hence "Apochromatic" is subject to devious marketing speak obfuscating the sometimes varying degrees of three-colour correction.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Posts: 983 Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
StillSanj wrote: |
I can't wait to acquire a mirrorless to try it out.
I do not envy my task of figuring out which purchase to make in that regard. |
You've acquired rare and higher end lenses lately, so i'll humbly suggest you get a FF
mirrorless camera to appreciate your finds to their full potential. _________________ "Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16662 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:36 am Post subject: Re: Matter of degrees |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
paulhofseth wrote: |
Some Kinoptiks also laid claim to such superior colour correction.
As with all optical devices, there is a range of deviation around the exact frequencies corrected for . Some current manufacturers use wording more loosely than others. Hence "Apochromatic" is subject to devious marketing speak obfuscating the sometimes varying degrees of three-colour correction.
p. |
Very true indeed Paul! Personally I rather use the term as used in microscopy where it really stands for perfect color correction without any color fringing and perfectly matching images in all three color channels. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2015 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Mir wrote: |
StillSanj wrote: |
I can't wait to acquire a mirrorless to try it out.
I do not envy my task of figuring out which purchase to make in that regard. |
You've acquired rare and higher end lenses lately, so i'll humbly suggest you get a FF
mirrorless camera to appreciate your finds to their full potential. |
Mir, thank you for sticking to the topic. You are right, I have gotten really lucky with some great bargains, on some great lenses.
I wood be remiss to get anything other than a FF. I can also get EOS adapter to use my my already converted/adapted lenses.
I will have to do some research what the best value purchase for Sony A# would be right now, then try to find one for the right price.
Very excited about the inevitable mirrorless addition, wish I didn't wait so long! Also, can't wait to try that 0.95 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|