| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 1246
Location: United Kingdom
|
 Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 2:15 pm Post subject: Jupiter 21M ( The Russian Beast) 200mm F4 |
 |
|
eddieitman wrote:
Well for today's arm workout we took the Jupiter 21m and Some extension tubes
What can i say it is built like a tank, really heavy piece of kit.
Gives some nice colours and if the subject and background are correct, can have quite a bit of 3d Pop.
Minimum Focus distance is 1.3m so not very good for close-ups but hence taking some extension tubes to fix that issue.
It does have quite a bit of CA in the branches, but the Pylon did not display much.
#1
@F4
#2
@F5.6
#3
@F8
#4
@F4
#5
@F8
#6
@F5.6
#7
@F8
#8
@F4
_________________
My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 885
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
A very good lens indeed. This is on APSC 24 Mpx. So this is with high pixel density. Heavy.
[img] [/url]Parc de Saint-Cloud jumelles by lumens pixel, sur Flickr[/img]
[img] [/url]Parc de Saint-Cloud Solitaire by lumens pixel, sur Flickr[/img]
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I'd love to have yours, because mine has a minimum focus distance of 1.8meters. Still pretty good since you were lucky when a 200mm did focus to 2m in those days. A lot of them stop at 2.5m and some at 3.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 885
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
We have the same lens. 200mm and 1,8m MFD on APSC is pretty good magnification.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 1246
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
Woops Sorry you are correct the MFD is 1.8, i must have miss read when looking at it
_________________
My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16658
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Hard to believe but this badboy actually covers Pentax 6x7. Aperture needed direct connection custom made and infinity was a pain to reach.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| Pancolart wrote: |
Hard to believe but this badboy actually covers Pentax 6x7. Aperture needed direct connection custom made and infinity was a pain to reach.
|
Interesting - and unexpected
How does it compare with the Pentax 67 200mm f4?
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
Interesting - and unexpected
How does it compare with the Pentax 67 200mm f4?
Tom |
I've only tried with Instax Wide so far. It proved proper coverage and sharpness but not much else since i still learn to develop properly. Optical design is quite different (Sonnar) so some difference is expected.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
