| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 3462
Location: Northern Ireland
|
 Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 4:44 pm Post subject: Infrared landscapes |
 |
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Sony DSC-F717 + Hoya R72
_________________
"I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I am not sure how to critique infared images as I have never attempted any myself.Firstly I do like the way they look and can imagine there is a learning curve involved.
The first image, the brighter white behind the building catches my eye...not sure if I like it,was it what you were aiming for? I do like the building.
The second image, I think possibly showing more sky than the white band/foreground across the bottom of the image.
In some of the other images I have seen using this technique there seems to be more changes/subtle differences within the whites...if that makes sense.
_________________
Moira, Moderator 
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16654
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 3462
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Mo.
I know what you mean about the white foliage, I'm having difficulty retaining detail in some of the highlight areas during post processing even though they were not blown out at the capture stage.
_________________
"I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I could not imagine that process being very easy with this technique.As long as you are happy with the results that is what counts.I just did not want your posts to be hanging here without comments  ...after the hard work you must have put into these. How many images went into #2 ?
I looked at these again when I had signed out.I found they "look" too my eyes anyway, slightly different when viewed with the MFlenses gray background...when I am signed in I use the MFblack.The detail in the grass at the front of the building stood out more.
_________________
Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 3462
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Thanks again, Mo. I would like to tell you that shot #2 is a stitched panorama which I spent hours producing, but in fact, it is cropped from one image. 
_________________
"I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 921
Location: Essex UK
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
| DigiChromeEd wrote: |
Thanks for your comments, Mo.
I know what you mean about the white foliage, I'm having difficulty retaining detail in some of the highlight areas during post processing even though they were not blown out at the capture stage. |
It's quite common in IR to find the red channel blown out while the standard histogram suggests nothing is being clipped. If a separate RGB histogram is available it's best to use that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 3462
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
| DConvert wrote: |
| It's quite common in IR to find the red channel blown out while the standard histogram suggests nothing is being clipped. If a separate RGB histogram is available it's best to use that. |
Thank you, I didn't know this. I'll bear it in mind next time.
_________________
"I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
